The Academic Integrity Policy defines our collective responsibility as a university community to uphold and maintain academic integrity. The Faculty Senate, the representative body responsible for faculty and librarians in university planning and governance, creates and maintains the Academic Integrity policy. This policy was adopted by the faculty senate in the 2024-2025 academic year, with an effective date of September 2, 2025.
The Academic Integrity policy provides a campus-wide standard for academic integrity. But specific guidelines for what is permitted may vary from class to class and even assignment to assignment. For example, collaboration on homework assignments may be permitted in one computer science course, but not in another. It is crucial that instructors communicate academic integrity standards for their courses clearly with students both in class and on their course syllabi, and that students ensure their understanding of academic integrity standards for each course they take.
The policy prohibits all forms of academic dishonesty and is applicable to all students (undergraduate, graduate, non-degree, visiting, etc.) and instructors participating in academic classes, programs, and research at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Matters of dishonesty related to paid research completed under a Principal Investigator employed at UMass fall under the UMass Amherst Research Misconduct Procedures.
Procedures
The Academic Integrity process begins when an instructor suspects academic dishonesty has occurred. Any suspicion of academic dishonesty from other parties (i.e., other students, instructors, staff, etc.) may be reported to the instructor of record to initiate the process.
The Academic Integrity policy requires that instructors who suspect academic dishonesty first notify the student and request a meeting to provide an opportunity to understand and respond to the allegation(s).
- The student must be contacted within 10 business days
- The student must be contacted through their UMass email address
- The instructor must request a meeting with the student (phone, Zoom, in person) to discuss the situation
- The student is allowed at least 5 business days from the initial outreach to respond
- The instructor should specify deadline for response (at least 5 business days)
After the initial outreach, there are three outcomes, pictured below:
No instructor may impose a penalty based solely on suspicion, without communicating with the student. If an instructor wishes to impose a grade penalty or other sanction for suspected academic dishonesty, they must do so through one of the documented policy processes (informal resolution, formal charge, or non-communication process).
The student and instructor meet to discuss the situation. The instructor decides no academic dishonesty has occurred and grades the student accordingly. In some cases, the instructor may want to refer the student to the Academic Integrity Office, so we can provide them with additional resources. Instructors can refer students to our office by emailing @email.
The student and instructor meet to discuss the situation. They agree to resolve the incident of academic dishonesty with an informal resolution.
Informal Resolutions are the most common way to address incidents of academic dishonesty. They represent an agreement between the instructor and student of both the description of the instance of academic dishonesty and the consequences.
By signing the Informal Resolution form, the student and instructor agree to the accuracy of the information reported in the form, they agree that the act of academic dishonesty did occur, and they understand and agree to the proposed consequence.
This information is recorded using our Informal Resolution Form and signed by both the instructor and student. Students should not sign an informal resolution if they do not agree with the described instance of academic dishonesty or the proposed sanction—once signed by both the instructor and student, informal resolutions cannot be appealed.
Records of informal resolutions are kept confidentially with the Academic Integrity Office unless a student acquires more than 2 violations of the Academic Integrity Policy (see below).
After initial outreach to the student, an instructor may file a formal charge of academic dishonesty within 15 business days of any of the following:
- The student, after 5 business days, has not responded to any outreach attempts
- The student and instructor agree that academic dishonesty occurred, but cannot agree to a description and penalty (i.e., an informal resolution cannot be reached)
- The student denies the allegation of academic dishonesty, but the instructor still believes the policy has been violated
- The instructor wishes to impose a University Sanction*
*For more information about sanctions, including University Sanctions, please view our Guide for Instructors.
A Formal Charge allows the student the option to officially appeal the suspicion of academic dishonesty. The Formal Charge form requires instructors submit a description of the incident, any evidence they would like to submit, and their intended sanction to resolve the incident of academic dishonesty.
When an instructor submits a formal charge, the Academic Integrity Office notifies the student, sends them the form and any submitted materials, and informs them of the 10-business day deadline to appeal the charge.
If the student does not appeal the formal charge, the instructor is notified that they may implement the intended sanction, and the charge becomes part of the student’s conduct record.
If the student does appeal the formal charge, the Academic Integrity Office will schedule a hearing, where both the instructor and student will present their case to a panel of Academic Integrity Board members.
Formal Charge Appeal Hearings
When a student appeals a formal charge of academic dishonesty, the matter is resolved at a Formal Charge Appeal Hearing. During these hearings, a panel of members of the Academic Integrity Board review information presented by both the instructor and student to make a formal finding on the outcome of the case.
Before the hearing, the instructor and student each submit materials for the panel members to review. These materials typically include the course syllabus, information about the academic exercise (paper, exam, etc.), a copy of the academic exercise, statements related to the suspected incident of academic dishonesty, and any other relevant evidence or information that may help the panel decide on the case outcome.
During the hearing, both the instructor and student have 10 minutes to present to the panel, and 10 minutes to give a closing statement. Panel members may ask questions to better understand the presentations or submitted materials.
After the hearing, the panel privately deliberates on the hearing outcome. The Academic Integrity Office will communicate the finding to the instructor and student. When the panel upholds a formal charge, the instructor may implement the sanction, and the charge becomes a part of the student’s record. When the panel dismisses the formal charge, the instructor must grade the student accordingly, and the charge is not recorded.
For more information about hearings, including who can be present at the hearing, please view the Academic Integrity Policy.
Instructors can submit a formal charge if a student does not respond to their outreach about suspected academic dishonesty, but in some cases an instructor may choose to use the non-communication process. If a student does not respond within 5 business days to an instructor’s initial outreach, the instructor may reach out to the student again, to notify them that their grade will be changed without active communication within five business days.
If the student does not respond to any outreach (at least two documented attempts, one of which must notify the student of the process), the instructor may submit the non-communication form. The Academic Integrity Office will review the form and notify the instructor that they may change the student’s grade. The AIO will also notify the student of the process.
For more information about the Non-Communication Process (including email templates), please view our Guide for Instructors page.
Multiple Instances of Academic Dishonesty
The Academic Integrity Office keeps records of any informal resolutions, non-communication forms, and upheld formal charges a student acquires during their time at UMass Amherst. If a student has accumulated three or more academic honesty resolutions, the Academic Integrity Office is required to schedule a hearing to address the matter.
Hearings that address three or more findings of academic dishonesty are known as University Sanction Hearings. Unlike typical Formal Charge hearings, which are designed to address whether an act of dishonesty occurred and a reasonable consequence, University Sanction Hearings are to address a pattern of confirmed cases of academic dishonesty. In this process, students face additional sanctions, ranging up to suspension.
The student will be invited to the University Sanction Hearing and granted an opportunity to present their case to a representative of either the Dean of Students Office (undergraduate students) or the Graduate School (graduate students) and a panel of Academic Integrity Board members. The outcome of a University Sanction Hearing becomes part of the student’s conduct record.
For more information about the University Sanction Hearing process, please contact @email