Academic Regulations > Graduate School Academic Regulations
Academic Regulations > Graduate School Academic Regulations Faculty Senate…The Graduate School academic regulations policies provide UMass Amherst faculty and graduate students with guidelines about academic enrollment, goals, and progress; degree requirements; the academic grievance procedure; and more.
Academic Regulations > Graduate School Academic Regulations > Graduate School Academic Grievances Policy
Academic Regulations > Graduate School Academic Regulations > Graduate School Academic Grievances Policy Faculty Senate…I. Overview
The Graduate School Grievance (“GSG”) procedure exists to deal with complaints by current or former graduate students against the University, one of its administrative or academic units, or one of its faculty or staff concerning “Very Serious Academic Matters”, as defined in Section II(3) herein. To ensure that the possibility of informal resolution is first explored fully, complainants are strongly urged to avail themselves of the services of the University Ombuds Office before invoking the GSG process. A graduate student with a complaint against another student should consult the Dean of Students Office.
II. Scope
- The complainant must be a current or former graduate student at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. If the complainant is a former graduate student, then the matter must primarily involve events that occurred while the complainant was still a student.
- The following matters are outside the scope of the GSG procedure:
- Matters of academic judgment, as defined in the Academic Grievance Procedures.
- Complaints that are pending, under appeal, or have been brought to a final disposition under any other campus grievance, complaint, or investigative process.
- Grading disputes and other Academic Grievances that are addressed under the University’s Academic Grievance Procedures.
- Decisions about admission or readmission into a graduate program, which are addressed in the Admissions Policies and Regulations and the Enrollment Policies and Regulations sections of the Graduate School Bulletin.
- Matters that lie within the scope of other existing University policies, including, but not limited to: the Research Misconduct Policy, the Code of Student Conduct, the Sexual Harassment Policy, the Workplace Bullying Grievance Procedure, the Affirmative Action and Non-Discrimination Policy, the Rules and Regulations Governing the Residency Status of Students for Tuition Purposes, disability accommodation and service animal policies, and the Academic Honesty Policy. (For links to these and other policies, see the University’s Policies and Procedures page.) Exceptions may be made with the approval of the Graduate Dean at the request of the administrator(s) responsible for enforcing these other policies.
- Matters that lie within the scope of the collective bargaining agreement between the University and the Graduate Employee Organization (GEO).
- “Very Serious Academic Matters” which fall within the scope of the GSG procedure, unless excluded under Section II(2) above, include, but are not limited to:
- Academic dismissal.
- Involuntary transfer from doctoral to master’s program.
- The Statute of Limitations for completion of a graduate degree.
- Satisfactory progress toward completion of the degree.
- Inconsistent application of Graduate School or graduate program policies or requirements.
- Significant failure by advisors to discharge their responsibilities, and other aspects of faculty/student relations, not falling under any other existing policy.
- Comprehensive examinations.
- Theses and dissertations.
- Fellowships and other sources of funding lying outside the scope of the GEO collective bargaining agreement, if they are administered by the University and are awarded for academic merit.
- Retaliation for bringing a complaint under this procedure.
- In general, the GSG procedure is limited to adjudicating Very Serious Academic Matters, as defined above in section II(3), that cannot be handled through the procedures set forth in existing University policies.
- The matter must involve some specific harm with the possibility of remediation.
- The proposed remedy must lie within the authority of the Dean of the Graduate School.
III. Filing a complaint
- A case is opened by a letter from the complainant addressed to the Dean of the Graduate School. The letter should detail the basis for the complaint and the remedy sought. It should be complete and specific, including the names of witnesses to any relevant event(s), with the dates of those event(s). The complainant will not be permitted to raise new issues later in the process unless the complainant alleges further harm after the submission of this letter or new evidence has emerged that was not known to the complainant at the time of filing. A complaint must be filed no later than one year after the point at which the subject of the complaint first became known to the complainant.
- In consultation with Associate and Assistant Deans of the Graduate School and the Chair of the Graduate Council, the Dean of the Graduate School will decide whether:
- the matter falls within the scope of the GSG process, and
- the proposed remedy (if any is set forth by complainant) is within the Dean’s authority to grant. If in the judgment of the Dean (in consultation with the Associate and Assistant Deans of the Graduate School and the Chair of the Graduate Council), one or both of these requirements is not met, the Dean will so inform the complainant in writing. The Dean may request a revised complaint, particularly when the proposed remedy lies outside the Dean’s authority. The Dean may also dismiss the complaint if another University policy applies to the matter raised. A decision to dismiss the complaint is not subject to appeal and a substantially similar complaint cannot be submitted later by the same complainant.
IV. Soliciting a response
- If the complaint alleges harm by named individuals, such as faculty members, or a named unit, such as an academic department, a copy of the complaint will be sent to the individual(s) or unit by the Dean and they will be invited to respond in writing. That response must be received by the Dean within 14 calendar days when classes are in session, or as soon as practicable when classes are not in session, but in any case no later than 14 calendar days after classes resume.
- After receiving the response, the Dean may attempt to bring the parties to an informal resolution. If an informal resolution is reached, it will be recorded in a memorandum of understanding signed by all parties.
- If no informal resolution is reached, the Dean will convene a GSG panel to consider the matter and make a recommendation.
V. GSG Process
The GSG panel will be chosen by the Dean in consultation with the chair of the Graduate Council. It will be comprised of three graduate faculty members and two graduate students drawn from the Council’s membership, available to serve and having no conflicts of interest. If insufficient members of the Graduate Council are available to serve and without conflicts, or if the case requires technical expertise outside of that available in the membership of the Graduate Council, the Dean may, in consultation with the chair of the Graduate Council, appoint GSG panel members as necessary from the graduate faculty or graduate students at large. The Dean will choose one faculty member of the GSG panel to serve as chairperson. Once this body has been empaneled, the Dean, an Associate Dean, or a Graduate School staff member will provide it with training in the hearing process.
VI. The Hearing
The GSG panel will meet to consider the complaint. This hearing will proceed as follows:
- Timing
When classes are in session, the hearing will commence no later 30 calendar days after the GSG panel is appointed. When classes are not in session, the hearing will commence as soon as is practicable, but in no case later than 30 calendar days after classes resume. - Companions
The Complainant has a right to be accompanied by one companion, who may advise him/her during the hearing. Under no circumstances will the companion be permitted to address the GSG panel. The companion cannot be an attorney. - Rules of the Hearing
- The Chairperson of the GSG panel will fix the time and place for the hearing, and will give prior written notice to the Complainant and to any individual(s) or departmental representatives who submitted a response under section IV above. The complainant will be responsible for notifying companion and witnesses, and will provide the Chairperson with their names and roles prior to the hearing. The Chairperson will allow individuals to participate remotely by telephone or internet, provided that the remote participant is audible to all local participants, and vice-versa.
- The hearing will not be recorded, and no written transcript will be made. Witnesses will not be sworn.
- The following persons are entitled to attend the hearing: the Complainant, the Complainant’s companion, and any individual(s) or departmental representatives who submitted a written response under section IV. Witnesses will be brought into the hearing only when giving testimony.
- The GSG panel may proceed with the hearing and make its findings of fact and recommendations even in the absence of any person who fails to appear. The GSG panel may not, however, base its findings or recommendations on the fact that a person failed to appear. The GSG panel may grant a postponement for good cause.
- During the hearing, the Complainant may make statements, offer evidence, and bring forth witnesses previously identified to the GSG Panel to make statements to the GSG Panel, subject to questioning from the GSG Panel. The GSG Panel may also request that the Complainant produce any such additional evidence as the GSG panel deems necessary to an understanding of the complaint. If anyone has filed a written response to the complaint, the GSG Panel will also offer those persons an opportunity to address the panel.
- Witnesses will be limited to those with actual knowledge of the facts of the case. The number of witnesses will normally be limited to three, but the Chairperson of the GSG panel can permit a larger number.
- The Chairperson will have authority to truncate argument or testimony that is dilatory, irrelevant, or repetitious.
- The GSG panel will not be bound by the procedures and rules of evidence in a court of law. The Complainant may not introduce new claims or arguments at the hearing not made in their written submission of the original complaint or the response unless relevant new evidence has become available. The Chairperson will determine whether new evidence presented for the first time at the hearing is relevant or not.
- The burden of proof is on the Complainant, and the GSG panel’s findings shall be determined by a preponderance of the evidence.
- The GSG panel may in its discretion recess the hearing until a future date upon request of any party or upon its own initiative.
VII. The Report
Within 21 calendar days after the conclusion of the hearing, the Chairperson will submit the GSG panel’s written report to the Dean of the Graduate School. The report will state the GSG panel’s findings of fact on the question(s) in dispute and the GSG’s recommendations for action, if any. Both the findings of fact and the recommendations will be determined by majority vote of the GSG panel. The report will include the panel’s vote.
VIII. Final Disposition
The Dean of the Graduate School will normally order a resolution in accordance with the GSG panel’s recommendations. If the GSG recommends a resolution that is beyond the Dean’s authority, the Dean will endeavor to find an alternative resolution that adheres to the spirit of the GSG panel’s recommendation. If the Dean disagrees with the GSG panel’s recommendations, that disagreement will be explained in writing to the panel and the Complainant, who will also receive a copy of the panel’s report. The Dean’s judgment in such matters will be final and not subject to appeal, except as set forth below. In the event of an adverse outcome, the Complainant may appeal to the Dean within 10 working days. Such appeals are limited to procedural matters involving the conduct of the GSG hearing or the emergence of material new evidence that was not available at the time of the hearing. The remedy is limited to the Dean’s convening a new GSG panel to hear the case de novo. There is no further appeal. Individuals who file a complaint under this procedure shall be expected to abide by the final disposition of the complaint.
Source: 17-026
Academic Regulations > Graduate School Academic Regulations > Enrollment Policies
Academic Regulations > Graduate School Academic Regulations > Enrollment Policies Faculty Senate…Source: Graduate Bulletin
Coursework, Grading, and Academic Standing
Registration and Statute of Limitations
Course Withdrawal and Religious Absences
Leaves of Absence
Administrative Withdrawal
Academic Regulations > Graduate School Academic Regulations > Degree Requirements
Academic Regulations > Graduate School Academic Regulations > Degree Requirements Faculty Senate…All requirements for any advanced degrees to be awarded at a given degree-granting period (February, May, September) must be completed by the appropriate deadline as published on the Graduate School's calendar (generally, mid-January for February; early April for May; and the last working day of August for September). The completed Degree Eligibility Form, signed by the candidate, the Graduate Program Director, and the Department Chair/Head, must be submitted to the Graduate Student Service Center by the specified date so that all the candidate's credentials can be certified before the degree is actually awarded. Please refer to the Graduate Student Handbook for further detailed guidance in the preparation and completion of a program of study. Guidelines for Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations are also available online.
Any Graduate School regulation or procedure shall not preclude graduate programs from developing specific regulations or procedures which are more restrictive or selective.
Source: https://catalog.umass.edu/gradbulletin/2022-2023/Page21171.html
Master's Degree Requirements
In addition to the Master of Arts (M.A.) and Master of Science (M.S.) degrees, the University also offers the following master's degrees: Master of Architecture (M.Arch.), Master of Arts in Teaching (M.A.T.), Master of Business Administration (M.B.A.), Master of Science in Business Analytics (M.S.B.A.), Master of Science in Accounting (M.S.Acctg.), Master of Design (M.Des.), Master of Education (M.Ed.), Master of Finance (M.F.), Master of Fine Arts (M.F.A.), Master of Landscape Architecture (M.L.A.), Master of Music (M.M.), Master of Regional Planning (M.R.P.), Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering (M.S.B.M.E.), Master of Science in Chemical Engineering (M.S.Ch.E.), Master of Science in Civil Engineering (M.S.C.E.), Master of Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering (M.S.E.C.E.), Master of Science in Engineering Management (M.S.Eng.Mgt.), Master of Science in Environmental Engineering (M.S.Env.Eng.), Master of Science in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research (M.S.I.E.O.R.), Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering (M.S.M.E.), Master of Public Policy and Administration (M.P.P.A.), Master of Public Policy (M.P.P.), and Master of Public Health (M.P.H.). Programs are described elsewhere in this Bulletin; for all other programs consult specific program of study.
Dual master's degrees are offered in the following programs: Architecture (M.Arch.)/Design (M.Des.), Business Analytics (M.S.B.A.)/Management (M.B.A.), Civil Engineering (M.S.C.E.)/Management (M.B.A.), Education (M.Ed.)/Public Policy and Administration (M.P.P.A.), Environmental Engineering (M.S.Env.Eng.)/Management (M.B.A.), Industrial Engineering and Operations Research (M.S.I.E.O.R.)/Management (M.B.A.), Landscape Architecture (M.L.A.)/Architecture (M.Arch.), Landscape Architecture (M.L.A.)/Design (M.Des.), Landscape Architecture (M.L.A.)/Regional Planning (M.R.P.), Mechanical Engineering (M.S.M.E.)/Management (M.B.A.), Public Policy and Administration (M.P.P.A.)/Management (M.B.A.), Public Policy and Administration (M.P.P.A.)/Public Health (M.P.H.), Public Policy and Administration (M.P.P.A)/Regional Planning (M.R.P.), Regional Planning (M.R.P.)/Architecture (M.Arch.), Regional Planning (M.R.P.)/Civil Engineering (M.S.C.E.), Regional Planning (M.R.P.)/Geography (M.S.), Sport Management (M.S.)/Management (M.B.A.), Sustainability (M.S.)/Regional Planning (M.R.P.).
Requirements for All Doctoral Programs
(Including Doctor of Philosophy and Doctor of Education Degree Requirements)
The doctoral degree is conferred upon graduate students who have met the following requirements:
- Successful completion of all courses and projects specified by the adviser/guidance committee within the guidelines of the candidate's graduate studies program.
- A doctoral candidate must spend the equivalent of at least one continuous academic year of full-time graduate work (nine credits per semester) in residence at the university. The residency year must be either in fall/spring or spring/fall sequence. During this year, the student must spend some part of each week physically on campus. Doctoral students enrolled in recognized off-campus programs may satisfy this regulation at their off-campus site.
- Satisfactory completion of foreign language requirements, if required by the candidate's graduate studies program. (These requirements are listed in the departmental sections of this Bulletin.)
- Passing a preliminary comprehensive examination conducted by the major department. Any student who fails the comprehensive examination may, at the discretion of the examining committee, be permitted a second and final examination.
- Registration for the required number of dissertation credits (refer to the Policies and Regulations section of this Bulletin).
- Submission of an approved dissertation prospectus to the Graduate School at least seven months prior to the Final Oral Examination (defense of dissertation).
- Preparation of a dissertation satisfactory to the Dissertation Committee and the Department Head/Chair.
- Passing a final (at least partly oral) examination conducted by the Dissertation Committee. This examination shall be primarily upon, but not necessarily limited to, the candidate's dissertation. This examination time and date shall be submitted to the Graduate Dean for announcement to the Graduate Faculty when all of the Dissertation Committee members and the Department Head/Chair agree that the dissertation is sufficiently complete to stand defense; approval of the dissertation, passing the defense, and/or recommending the degree are not implied by scheduling this examination.
- Doctoral students are expected to achieve candidacy within six years and required to complete their program within five years of achieving candidacy. Candidacy is recommended by the academic department upon satisfactory completion of coursework and passing the qualifying examination. One- or two-year extensions to this policy will be considered by the Graduate Dean upon recommendation from the student's Graduate Program Director.