Budget Preparation

Budget Preparation Allison Koss

There is much to consider when putting together a budget, including compliance with sponsor requirements, solicitation guidelines, and university policy. Below are some basic tips to help make budget development easier:

  • Begin planning early on. Discuss project scope and budget right at the beginning.
  • Refer to sponsor guidance for budget limitations
  • Check in with pre-award support staff in your department or college for help. Areas of campus lacking pre-award support can request help here.
  • Use Kuali to build the budget. It will pull in current salaries and fringe rates.
  • Double check the indirect cost rate – consult the UMass Amherst Indirect Cost Rate Agreement, the on and off campus indirect cost rate determination procedure, sponsor guidelines, and the solicitation to determine the correct indirect cost rate.
  • Include cost sharing only if required by the sponsor
  • Finalize the budget prior to routing to the Office of Pre-Award Services (OPAS), a week ahead if possible. Keep last minute additions and changes to a minimum, as these can delay routing. In general, any changes made once the proposal has been logged in should be made in response to an OPAS review.
  • Make sure the totals match across all documents – Kuali budget, sponsor forms, sponsor budget, and budget justification. After creating the budget and justification, always take one last look at the justification to ensure congruence with the budget. It is easy to miss one or more changes when making edits or adjusting the budget in response to reviewers’ comments.
  • Provide back up documentation to show how costs were determined. Inclusion of these items will facilitate review of the proposal by the OPAS review team by helping confirm reasonableness of cost.

Budget Basics

Budget Basics Allison Koss

A budget is a detailed statement outlining estimated project costs to support a sponsored project. An effective budget outlines a proposed project in fiscal terms and helps reviewers to determine how the project will be conducted.

A budget will typically consist of two main categories of cost:

  1. Direct costs
  2. Indirect costs — also known as Facilities & Administrative (F&A) to the federal government; and generally known as “overhead”.

A budget should include all the Direct Costs and Facilities and Administrative (F&A) (or overhead) costs required to carry out the project objectives. Specific requirements, including cost principles as defined by the federal government in the Office of Management & Budget (OMB)'s Uniform Guidance, must be adhered to at the proposal stage and when the funds are expended. Proposals to non-federal sponsors requesting approval of direct costs which are unallowable for federal reimbursement should clearly include and justify those costs in the budget.

Budgets should be planned ahead of time, and all needs of the project budgeted for. Budgets must be final five days before the proposal deadline, and budget changes within the five days may only be made at the Office of Pre-Award Service's (OPAS) request. If a budget includes subrecipients, those should be included in Kuali and in the proposal package that will be submitted to the sponsor. If a final budget including the required subrecipient information is not included at the time of submission, the proposal will be considered non-compliant to the sponsored project proposal submission requirements and procedures, and will need to go through the late proposal process.

Please follow any budgetary guidelines that may be found in the Request for Proposals (RFP), Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), or other posted sponsor guidelines. Sponsors may limit indirect costs, PI or other salary costs, or require cost share to be responsive to the RFP.

It is also important to understand the Foundational Basis for Costing:

Costs must be 1) Reasonable, 2) Allocable 3) and Allowable, and 4) Consistently treated

Reasonable: The “prudent person” test is employed – would a prudent person purchase the item at this cost? The cost is necessary for the performance of the activity.

Allocable: Costs must be directly related to the sponsored project activity. Costs accrue to the project based on the proportional benefit to the project.

Examples of un-allocable costs:

  • Charging 100% of a maintenance contract to one project although the covered piece of equipment is only utilized 50% of the time on that project.
  • Including personnel costs for a temporary replacement lecturer to cover a professor’s time while that professor is out of the classroom conducting research for the sponsored project activity.

Allocable solutions to the above:

  • Charge the allocable portion (50%) of the maintenance contract.
  • Include academic year salary commensurate with the percentage of effort the faculty member anticipates working on the project. The faculty members’ department will not have to lay out funds to cover the sponsor funded academic salary, thus the lecturer can be paid from those cost savings. This arrangement should not be noted in the sponsor proposal. The faculty member’s effort would simply be referred to as “academic year effort” and not “replacement salary” or “course buyout.”

Allowable: Costs must be allowable according to the governing cost principles, the policies of the sponsor, and UMass policies and procedures. For federally supported projects, The Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Uniform Guidance is the document, other than sponsor guidelines, that determines allowability of cost. OMB’s Uniform Guidance is not applicable to non-federal projects unless federal terms and conditions flow-through from the prime funder.

Consistent: The cost is consistent with established university policies and procedures.

Policies and resources affecting the determination of RAAC (Reasonableness, Allocability, Allowability, and Consistency):

Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200)

Cost Accounting Standards: Administrative Costs; Cost Sharing Requirements & Procedures; Cost Transfer PolicyUniversity Business and Travel Expense Policy & Standards

Budget Basics

Direct Costs

Direct Costs Allison Koss

Direct costs are those expenses which can be directly attributed to the project.

This section goes over types of direct costs, including:

  • Personnel costs
  • Fringe benefits
  • Materials and supplies
  • Equipment
  • Travel
  • Consultants
  • Subrecipients
  • Other direct costs

Personnel Costs

Personnel Costs Allison Koss

See information outlined below for the following personnel costs: 

  • Faculty salary & effort (academic and summer)
  • Other project staff
  • Administrative/clerical positions
  • Postdoctoral research associates/senior postdoctoral research associates
  • Graduate research assistants
  • Undergraduate students
  • Temporary employees (03)

Faculty Salary & Effort (academic and summer)

  • Proposals should accurately represent the amount of direct research effort that key personnel are committing to the project. The amount of effort committed to a sponsored project is based on a best estimate of the actual effort required to meet the goals and outcomes of the proposed project. 
  • For federally funded projects, effort for all key personnel and in particular for faculty must be budgeted minimally at 1% or greater. This correlates to 0.09 months for academic year appointments and 0.12 for calendar year appointments. As noted, effort should typically be budgeted substantially greater than 1% since budgeted effort should reflect the actual effort needs of the project. For more details, see the policy statement Minimum Effort on Sponsored Projects.
  • Faculty should consult with their department chairs to determine how much time they are allowed to dedicate to research projects. Personnel effort on all ACTIVE awards plus teaching load cannot exceed 100%. In other words, 2.5 months summer salary + committed academic year research effort (up to the maximum percentage allotted for research by your department during the academic year) + Teaching load + Outreach + other obligations = 100%. 
  • Faculty academic year (AY) and summer effort should be budgeted as separate line items. 
  • Show basis of effort in accordance with sponsor guidelines this is either represented on a “person month” basis or % of effort. Because awarded UMass budgets get loaded utilizing a “person month” basis, this should be the default approach. If the sponsor requires using a different basis (% or hourly for example), always provide the person month equivalence in the Budget Justification. 
  • Effort charged to sponsored projects must be allocable, allowable, reasonable, and if awarded consistently reported and tracked in the UMass effort reporting system: Employee Compensation Compliance (ECC). 
  • If awarded, budgeted effort will need to be obligated and spent against the sponsor account. And, importantly, it must be tracked in the ECC system at a level that matches the level of effort as proposed to the sponsor unless the sponsor allows or approves a change in the level of effort. Please consult with OPAM in advance if considering rebudgeting key person effort. 
  • The university must be able to provide auditable records of committed effort. This is achieved primarily by payroll being charged to the grant at a level that aligns with the sponsor expectations for effort commitments. 
  • Alternatively, when sponsors mandate cost-sharing, academic effort can be cost shared and tracked in accordance with University policy and procedures. See Cost Sharing Requirements & Procedures.

Academic 

  • As a rule of thumb, faculty can expect to maximally allocate up to approximately 3.5 academic months across their grant portfolio without opting for course buy-outs. Consult with department chairs. 
  • Budgeting academic effort is not mandatory, but if academic year effort commitments are significant for any one grant, academic effort should be budgeted. If a significant amount of academic year effort is required, course buy-outs should be explored with the department and budgeted as academic year effort accordingly. Do not refer to the effort as a “course buy-out” in the proposal itself – that is for internal UMass purposes only. Use the term “academic year” effort instead. 
  • If academic year effort commitments for any given project are not anticipated to be significant but rather incidental, effort does not need to be budgeted. In these scenarios, it is assumed that other budgeted project related personnel (Graduate Research Assistants, other faculty, postdocs, etc.) are primarily carrying the project in the academic year.  If it is a federally funded project, do keep the Minimum Effort on Sponsored Projects in mind to satisfy the effort commitment requirements of that policy. 
  • Unless the sponsor mandates cost-sharing, do not refer to contributions of academic year effort in any quantifiable mannerIf academic year effort is not significant, and you are not charging or cost-sharing academic effort, the following language for the budget justification would be acceptable: “The PI will be fully involved in the project throughout the year to ensure that the scope and objectives are met.” 

Summer 

  • Faculty may charge up to 2.5 summer months across their sponsored projects portfolio in any given year. 
  • If budgeted as summer effort, effort must be committed during the summer. If budgeted as summer salary, effort cannot be committed during the academic year and paid out as summer effort/compensation. 
  • Approval is needed to commit more than 2.5 summer months of effort in any given year. Keep in mind that if 3 months of summer effort is budgeted in any given year, no non-sponsored project activities can take place during the period of compensation (no vacation, course planning, etc.).

Calendar Year 

  • Calendar year faculty are not eligible for summer salary. All effort must be budgeted as calendar year effort.

Emeritus Faculty

Emeritus (retired) faculty are eligible to be Principal Investigators as long as both the department head and dean approve during Kuali proposal routing. Access to Kuali is restricted to faculty and staff with active appointments. Emeritus status is available only to those faculty who have permanently retired from the university. Normally, it is granted only to those with ten or more years of service to the university and who have attained the rank of full professor. Emeritus status is awarded by the chancellor only upon recommendation by the provost.

When combined with retirement salary, the salary for emeritus faculty charged to the sponsor cannot exceed the base annual salary upon retirement: retirement + sponsor funded salary = not greater than base salary upon retirement. After being retired one full calendar year one may earn the difference plus an additional $15,000. More information

Only Worker’s Compensation, UI, UHI, MTX, and PFML is assessed on their salary. See current fringe rates.

Other Project Staff

Other project staff consist of technicians, programmers, engineers, project coordinators, administrative/secretarial, etc. 

  • Effort is budgeted based on actual need and as allowable by sponsor. 
  • Do not cost share effort in any way whether quantifiable or not unless the sponsor mandates cost sharing. 
  • Full fringe is typically required.

Administrative/Clerical Positions

Non-federal sponsors: Administrative/clerical costs may be budgeted at will on non-federally funded projects as long as there are no restrictions in the sponsor guidelines and funding is not also prime federal. Be aware of federal flow downs in the guidelines. 

Federal sponsors: In response to federal restrictions on the direct charging of administrative/clerical personnel to sponsored projects, UMass budgets should only include these costs when: 

  • A minimum of 25% FTE (3 months) is budgeted per year 
  • The position is required by the project scope, due to the project's special purpose & circumstance where the services provided go above and beyond the scope of those normally provided by administrative personnel. See the Administrative Cost Requirements. Please review carefully and study sample secretarial justifications as well. 
  • Clarification: Account monitoring, meeting arrangements, or typing general correspondence or reports on behalf of a grant/contract would be considered the normal services to be provided by the University and treated as an indirect cost; consequently they would NOT be allowed as a direct cost.

Postdoctoral Research Associates/Senior Post Doctoral Research Associates

  • Salary levels vary from department to department based on market and seniority – rates not to fall below mandated minimum. 
  • Postdocs cannot be Principal Investigators in their own right. Postdocs must have their faculty advisor as a Co-PIIf sponsor guidelines do not allow for the budgeting of any faculty effort or if the program is strictly a Postdoc research grant or fellowship and specified as such in the sponsor guidelines, the faculty advisor should be listed on the IPF as a Co-PI and included in the IPF routing. See Roles and Responsibilities of Principal Investigators/Co-investigators.

Graduate Research Assistants

  • Determine annual salary, fringe, and tuition charge levels using the Kuali Salary Guide (Excel) found here. This calculator will reliably calculate graduate Research Assistant (RA) base salary, percent of effort, and tuition while also accommodating for sponsor specific Cost of Living Adjustments (COLA). 
  • Print out the Kuali Salary Guide and load it into the Internal Attachments section of Kuali. This will help OPAS confirm your calculations. 
  • Be sure the Budget and the Budget Justification match these calculations.

Undergraduate Students

  • Budget using an hourly rate – must be at least the current Commonwealth of Massachusetts minimum wage.
  • Only budget fringe on summer effort and only if not enrolled in summer classes. See Fact Sheet for current rate (Student Summer Payroll)

Temporary Employees (03)

  • If salary is budgeted for an individual who doesn’t otherwise have an appointment nor will s/he be appointed on a permanent basis if the proposal is awarded, and this individual will be using UMass facilities to help conduct the actual research, that person qualifies as a temporary employee. 
  • 6 month maximum appointment per year (50%) 
  • Non-benefitted: For non-students, classified, professional, or faculty hired below 50% time, benefits are not applicable, only the non-benefitted rate is assessed - Unemployment Compensation Insurance Premium (UI), Universal Health Insurance (UHI) contribution, and the employer share of Medicare Tax (MTX).

Fringe Benefits

Fringe Benefits Allison Koss

Fringe benefits are assessed on salaries depending on appointment type and term (academic year or summer). Fringe must be assessed against the budgeted salary at current rates.

  • Faculty academic year effort: Full fringe less Sick Leave Bank
  • Faculty summer effort: Only Worker’s Comp, UI, UHI, and MTX
  • Faculty 12-month calendar year appointments: Full fringe less Sick Leave Bank
  • Benefitted staff: Full fringe
  • Post docs: Health insurance, Worker’s Compensation, UI, UHI, MTX and Health & Welfare
  • Graduate Research Assistants: GEO Health Deferment rate, Health & Welfare, and Worker’s Compensation/UI/UHI/MTX on summer effort only

Some sponsors restrict charging for fringe or put a cap on the level that can be charged. These are rare, but in the event this requirement is in play, the difference between the amount allowed for reimbursement vs. actual fringe costs must be covered by UMass and typically that coverage will need to come from the department. Please consult with the OPAS pre-award administrator for input.

For current rates and details, please see the Fact Sheet.

Equipment

Equipment Allison Koss

Equipment 

The definition of equipment, as stated in 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92, is an article of tangible nonexpendable personal property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit. 

  • Itemize each piece of equipment listing specific brand names and associated specifications that affect costing.
  • In the budget justification, verify why the equipment is needed to carry out the specific aims of the project.
  • Costing must be based on vendor quotes or published catalog rates. Do not guesstimate.
  • Note dedication level in the justification. If budgeting the full cost of the equipment, the proposed project must receive the full benefit of its use. 
  • If a piece of equipment benefits two or more projects, the cost should be allocated proportionately. It is generally expected that only large equipment items should be split funded. Provide the rationale for split funding and be sure to make a direct parallel between expected proportional use and corresponding proportional cost. 
  • If the sponsor's indirect cost base is Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC), equipment is exempt from indirect costs. If it’s a Total Direct Cost (TDC) base, it is not exempt from indirect costs. 

Fabricated Equipment 

Fabricated Equipment is an item of capital equipment that has been constructed at UMass by UMass personnel specifically for a UMass project, as opposed to being purchased “off the shelf” from a vendor or commercial supplier. Fabricated Equipment must satisfy the Federal definition of equipment, meaning it must have a total cost of $5,000 or more, must be non-expendable and must have a useful life of one year or more. 

From time-to-time for reasons of cost efficiency, timeliness of delivery, non-availability or uniqueness of a particular piece of equipment, it may be necessary or advantageous for a research project to fabricate a piece of equipment rather than purchase the item. Such Fabricated Equipment is exempt from the Indirect Cost (F&A) Rate, subject to the criteria listed in the requirements: Fabricated Equipment Costs on Federal Research Grants and Contracts.

Principal Investigators should select Yes to fabricated equipment in the Kuali questionnaire and fill out the further questions.

Travel

Travel Sarah Vega-Liros

Travel

Travel costs are classified as those expenses for transportation, lodging, subsistence and related items incurred by employees who are traveling on official university business related to a sponsored project. 

Unless otherwise stated by the sponsor, domestic travel is considered to be travel among any of the 50 United States, its possessions and territories, and Canada. 

Foreign travel is classified as travel outside the areas listed above. 

Some items to consider

  • During budget preparation, consideration should be given to expenses for attending professional meetings and conferences related to the project, field work travel and living allowances, consultation with experts, and meetings required by the sponsor. 
  • Travel expenses and requests should be clearly justified and reasonable. 
  • Costs should be based on historical data (previous travel) and the UMass Travel Policy, airline quotes from a travel agency, and sponsor guidelines. 
  • Travel in excess of commercial coach airfare is normally non-recoverable. 
  • Keep in mind, foreign travel is a restricted category by most federal agencies and requires prior approval by the sponsor. 
  • When costs are charged to a federally-sponsored agreement, the use of U.S. flag carriers is required. 
  • The budget justification page should include the number of trips, the purpose and relationship to the project, and the estimated costs for each trip. For foreign travel the countries to be visited and the visit dates must also be included. 

Resources for Travel 

Materials and Supplies

Materials and Supplies Allison Koss

Materials and Supply Costs

Material and supplies is a broad category of costs that contains all non-capital items like computers and electronic equipment as well as laboratory materials and research related supplies. The scope of work will drive what gets budgeted in this cost category. The expenses must benefit the project, as well as be specifically identifiable with the aims of the project.

Budgeted costs must be Reasonable, Allowable, and Allocable (RAA).

  • Reasonable: Basis of cost should be provided in the Budget Justification. The cost should be based on existing costs for same or similar sponsored projects as it correlates to the needs of the project or should be based on actual quotes.  Note the basis of your cost estimate in your Budget Justification.
  • Allowable: The sponsor must allow the budgeting of the cost. Federal cost principles for example restrict the charging of so-called administrative/office supply costing (see below).
  • Allocable: Cost and use must be solely assignable to the sponsored project.

Administrative/Office Supplies (federal)

Office Supplies: This type of expense may be appropriate as a direct charge to a grant/contract only when it clearly benefits/supports programmatic objectives. Examples would include research notebooks and computer paper used during the technical course of a project. Items such as pencils, paper clips, memo pads and post-its are normally considered an indirect cost and therefore not allowable as a direct charge. Reasonable judgment should be exercised when charging office supplies directly to a grant/contract because they are likely to be highly scrutinized during sponsor proposal review or during an audit.

Postage: The direct charging of postage to an award for purposes such as the shipment of materials, mailing of research surveys to human subjects and submitting deliverables is appropriate if reasonable care is taken to assure that such costs are for the sole purpose of the grant/contract and can be specifically identified and justified as such. Routine correspondence is considered to be an indirect cost and not an allowable direct charge.

See Administrative Costs Requirements and the Guidelines for Charges to Sponsored Projects Funded by Federal Agencies

Animal Care Costs

Animal purchases are considered technical supplies. Budget the cost to purchase laboratory animals separately from the cost of animal care. Please consult with the Animal Care Services for current rates.

Computers and Electronic Equipment (Federal)

Although the Uniform Guidance indicates that computing devices need not be solely dedicated to the performance of the federal award, there is still the concept of allocability that must be addressed. We need to confirm the allocability of the item in terms of cost vs. the benefit to the project. The cost of the computer to the project must accrue to the budget proportionally to the expected use. We do need to confirm that if we are budgeting the full cost of the computer that it is not in turn being used for other projects as well.

Incidental use for non-project related emails, etc. is acceptable, but if the project is charged the total cost of the computer, it is assumed that the project benefits proportionally and it is not being used on other projects. If proportional usage is expected, then the amount budgeted must be based on some reasonable expectation of allocable use.

In summary, and other points to consider about costs for use of computers and electronic equipment:

  • They must be necessary for and provide benefit to the project: the computer must be essential for project activities.
  • They must be allowable: the computer is specifically identifiable to the grant as an "unlike circumstance.”  While the Uniform Guidance indicates that the computer does not need to be solely dedicated to the project — it can be split funded and shared with other projects — a robust justification must be provided in the budget narrative demonstrating “unlike circumstance” and thus the justification will provide very specific and robust details on how the technical and scientific nature of the project drives the need to budget computing and electronic devices.  To provide evidence of unlike circumstances, the Principal Investigator must document in the proposal that the use of the computer is beyond the normal and customary use and application of computers in the day‐to‐day operations of the laboratory
  • The items must be directly allocable: the principal use of the computer must be directly allocable to the purpose, goals, and activities of the funded projects; they can be split funded with other projects but the justification should provide a rationale for charging a proportional cost to the grant.
  • They must be reasonable: there must be an informed, prudent decision making regarding the basis of the cost, utility, and value to the project.
  • Although incidental email use is acceptable, they must be non‐personal in nature.
  • The need for the items has been included in the original proposal and completely justified as to the reason it is being included, the purpose and benefit to the project have been fully described.
  • The PI is required to evaluate and ensure that the project does not have reasonable access to other devices or equipment that can achieve the same purpose. Devices may not be purchased for reasons of convenience or preference.  Include this evaluation in the budget justification.

Consultants and Subrecipients

Consultants and Subrecipients Allison Koss

Consultants

The Internal Revenue Service issued findings against UMass in an audit regarding the payment of individuals as consultants rather than employees (temporary), therefore, special consideration must be taken in the appointment of consultants. 

Please consider the following when budgeting: 

  • A consultant lends their expertise and advice in their given field without actually "working" on the project. 
  • A consultant does not conduct independent research. 
  • A consultant is neither affiliated with UMass nor using its facilities. 
  • A consultant does not use their home institution’s facilities to conduct any portion of their consultancy. For example, a consultant who is also employed by another university must not use their employer’s facilities to carry out their consulting agreement. 
  • A consultant must provide UMass with a letter that describes their role and indicates the number of days/weeks charged to the grant and provide daily or weekly rate. If the letter is on their home institution’s letterhead, the consultant should email the PI or OPAS confirming that they will not be using their home institution’s facilities for any part of their proposed consultancy. 
  • Intellectual property or publishing rights are not anticipated. 
  • UMass and other Commonwealth of Massachusetts employees cannot be paid as consultants on UMass-sponsored projects. 
  • UMass may be subjected to significant institutional tax penalties should the individual be incorrectly classified as a consultant when they are actually working on the project in a manner consistent with employer/employee relationships. 

Subrecipients

Generally a subrecipient (known in the Kuali system as an Organization), as compared to a consultant or fee for service vendor, is defined as an entity, often another university, who helps the grantee carry out the activities of the award by independently performing a portion of the research work using their own facilities. 

Documentation needed by OPAS includes: 

  • UMass subrecipient form to be filled in by subrecipient (found here under the Pre-Award FORMS section)
  • A letter of intent to establish a subaward agreement signed by the subrecipient's business official (OPAS equivalent) endorsing the work referenced in an attached statement of work and budget
  • Statement of work (subrecipient specific does not include UMass effort) 
  • Subaward budget, use sponsor budget forms as applicable 
  • Additional sponsor forms, including certifications as applicable 
  • Most federal sponsors also require biosketches from key personnel 
  • Facilities/Resources statement following sponsor format. Required by most federal sponsors and some non-federal 
  • Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if subrecipient is charging indirect costs) 
  • Sole source justification (provided at award stage) 

The subrecipient's sponsored programs office should forward the items listed above to the UMass PI well in advance of the deadline. The UMass PI will review the subaward budget in the lead proposal. All other items are not typically incorporated into the proposal but forwarded to OPAS for review and held on file in case of audit. 

The UMass detailed budget should not blend subaward costs with UMass project costs. Two separate detailed budgets should be included. The UMass detailed budget will include a line item each year showing Subrecipient Total Costs (inclusive of indirect costs). 

Subaward vs. standard procurement vs. consultant: If the individual or company in question provides a service for which a flat fee is charged for the work to be done and they are not involved in the research effort but simply provide a service at a fixed fee, this transaction of services is classified as a standard procurement rather than a subaward. 

Other Direct Costs

Other Direct Costs Allison Koss

Other Direct Costs

Other direct costs can be a catch all for costing that does not easily belong in any of the other major cost categories. Often they are contracted services rather than supplies, travel, equipment or labor related. They include such costs as:

  • Fee for service costs
  • Participant support costs
  • Maintenance contracts
  • Software licenses
  • Tuition
  • Telephone service

Fee for Service Costs

A fee-for-service cost is when a vendor provides a service for a set fee according to a published rate schedule routinely charged for same or similar items to all potential customers.

  • Examples of fee-for-services have included items such as assay services, catscan services, MRI facilities use, aerial photography, etc.
  • Provide OPAS a copy of the published rate sheet by loading it to the “Internal Attachments” section in Kuali.
  • In contrast to a subrecipient, the vendor would not be responsible for conducting a portion of the research but rather they simply provide a defined service for a set, published fee.
  • Fee-for-service items should be budgeted under "Other Direct Cost” and not blended with “Materials and Supplies”.
  • If the cost is a university-approved fee, the budget justification must show the facilities/service being utilized along with the actual university-approved fee per unit cost. Load a copy of the university-approved rate sheet to the “Internal Attachments” section in Kuali.

Human Subject Compensation (Research Participation Incentives)

Payment or non-monetary reward to subjects as remuneration for time and inconvenience of participation in research studies, as well as an incentive to participate. Compensation can include monetary (cash, gift cards, vouchers, etc.) and/or non-monetary (gifts/promotional items, course credit, extra credit, etc.) enumeration. Such compensation is subject to limits as outlined in the university's Business and Travel Expense Policy and Standards. See also the Controller's Office guidance on compensating human subjects. When budgeted into a grant or contract budget, such costs are treated as other direct costs and included in the direct cost base when calculating indirect costs.

 All research involving human subjects must be reviewed by the campus Institutional Review Board (IRB).  Approval must be obtained prior to any involvement of subjects.

Participant Support Costs

Participant support costs means direct costs for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances, and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with conferences, or training projects (2 CFR Part 200.75).

  • Costs that qualify as “participant support” are exempt from indirect costs.
  • Participant support costs are often subject to special sponsor regulations, in particular, the NSF –excerpted from the “Grant Proposal Guide”:

    “This budget category refers to costs for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances, and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with NSF sponsored conferences or training projects. Any additional categories of participant support costs other than those described in 2 CFR § 200.75 (such as incentives, gifts, souvenirs, t-shirts and memorabilia), must be justified in the budget justification, and such costs will be closely scrutinized by NSF. (See also GPG Chapter II.D.9) For some educational projects conducted at local school districts, however, the participants being trained are employees. In such cases, the costs must be classified as participant support if payment is made through a stipend or training allowance method. The school district must have an accounting mechanism in place (i.e., sub-account code) to differentiate between regular salary and stipend payments.”
     
  • In contrast with the NSF, NIH states that unless specifically listed as an allowable cost in the Program Announcement, NIH and other PHS agencies applicants should not budget Participant Support Costs. Keep this in mind and note the qualifying criteria in the definition provided above from 2 CFR Part 200.75.
  • UMass requires projects to track participant support costs in a separate sub-account
  • The transfer of funds budgeted for participant support costs, as defined in the Uniform Guidance (§200.75), to other categories of expense requires sponsor approval.

What does not qualify as participant support costs

  • Honoraria for guest speaker at a conference, symposium or workshop
  • Human Subjects – Incentive payments to encourage individuals to participate in research study and provide private data/information through intervention or interaction.  This includes participation in surveys and interviews.
  • Fellowships – financial support for a postdoctoral fellow to do things such as attend conferences or workshops
  • Payments to university employees (faculty, staff, and student employee on the award) or subrecipients
  • Project organizer, consultant, facilitator, or coordinator of the workshop, conference, training session
  • Speaker fees (unless the majority of time is spent as a participant and not a speaker)
  • Rental fees, catering and general supplies

Maintenance Contracts

Budgeted costs must be Reasonable, Allowable, and Allocable (RAA).

  • Reasonable: Basis of cost should be provided in the budget justification. The cost should be based on existing costs for same or similar contracts, quotes, or on-line catalog prices. Note basis in your budget justification.
  • Allocable: Cost must accrue to the budget based on benefit to the project for the covered item. If the equipment will be used 100% on the project, 100% of the maintenance can be charged to the sponsor. Provide a rationale for proportional usage and corresponding cost. See Budget Justification.

If budgeting based on expected proportional use, split funding generally should not fall below a reasonable level whereby multiple investigators share the cost in a manner that would suggest the need to create a fee based account for shared equipment use.

Split funding maintenance contracts should generally only occur on large laboratory equipment, not small equipment.

Software Licenses

Budgeted costs must be Reasonable, Allowable, and Allocable (RAA).

  • Reasonable: Basis of cost should be provided in the Budget Justification. The cost should be based on existing costs for same or similar contracts, quotes, or on-line catalog prices. Note basis in your Budget Justification
  • Allocable: Cost must accrue to the budget based on benefit to the project for the covered item.  Software cannot be split funded with other accounts. The budget justification should name the software product; note that it is dedicated to the project; and provide a strong justification for why it is needed especially emphasizing what aspect of the project will benefit from its use. The software should not be general purpose software but rather specialized in a manner that supports the specific technical aims of the project.

Do not split fund software. It must be dedicated exclusively to the aims of the proposed project.

Tuition Charge

A tuition charge (TC) is assessed on working Graduate Research Assistant (GRA) appointments.

  • TC is budgeted on an hourly basis during the academic year up to 760 hours per academic year (20 hrs. a week for 38 weeks as outlined in the GEO/university contract definition of "full-time"), per GRA. Summer effort is exempt.
  • For current rates, see the Fact Sheet
  • TC is always exempt from indirect costs.
  • If tuition is not allowed by the sponsor and that restriction is clearly noted in their guidelines, TC cost cannot be budgeted.
  • Use the Salary Guide (Excel) found here.

Telephone Service

Toll calls are allowable if they are allocable to the project and justified in the budget justification. Cell phones are generally not allowable due to difficulties of assuring allocability. They are however allowed in extremely unique situations.

Further guidance:

  • Explain why these devices are necessary for the performance of grant work or are necessary in order to accomplish the programmatic objectives of the project; clarify how they are for business, not personal use.
  • Is there an extensive and continual need for such devices throughout the project life, rather than simply an infrequent or periodic occurrence?
  • Demonstrate that the charges are easily allocable to the grant: substantiate that the cost will be solely consumed by, and solely benefit, the sponsored agreement or can be easily allocated in some manner.
  • Substantiate that these devices will be used for project work at a remote site inaccessible to normal departmental administrative support or normal phone facilities.

Charges for land lines are also not generally allowable except for extremely unique situations. The land line must be dedicated to the project and a strong justification provided that ties back to the technical needs of the project and specific aims of the project.

Cost of Living Adjustment

Cost of Living Adjustment Allison Koss

A cost of living adjustment (COLA) or allowance must be budgeted in order to cover cost increases ranging from union mandated raises for salaries and generic inflationary forces for other direct costs.

Salaries

  • Budget 3% to 5% COLAs for future years on multiple year projects.
  • Some sponsors set limits on COLAs. For example, NIH limits them to 2%.
  • If the budgeted rate of pay exceeds the employee's current rate of pay by more than 5%, or is otherwise out of line with bargaining unit agreements, please provide an explanation. Are there any pending personnel actions or anticipated promotions? Since OPAS is required to assess reasonableness of cost, provide detail either in a note to OPAS or in the budget justification itself.
  • The PI should be prepared with supporting documentation when sponsor award negotiation occurs in case any questions arise.

For the latest bargaining unit contracts and information on COLA's and merit raises, visit Human Resources.

Non-Salary Inflation Factor

  • Anywhere from 3 to 5% is also recommended.
  • Some sponsors place limits on the rate of inflation built into the proposal. Check sponsor guidelines for any restrictions.
  • Cost of living increases should not be applied to fringe or indirect cost (F&A) rates: use current (predetermined) rates or provisional rates as applicable. See the Fact Sheet.

Tuition Charge

  • Tuition charges should be inflated by 2 to 5%. Apply the same COLA rate to tuition charges as for salary and non-salary items in the budget. So, for NIH budgets, use 2%. For most other sponsors, use a COLA of between 3 and 5%.
  • Keep in mind that actual tuition rates will apply to the award, and tuition rates usually increase every year, so it is best practice to apply a COLA.  
  • Please reach out to the R&E Help Desk with questions about sponsor policies that deviate from these instructions.

Indirect Costs

Indirect Costs Allison Koss

Unless the sponsor has a published policy disallowing them, indirect costs must be budgeted see below for more details. For current rates, see the Fact Sheet. 

Definition

Indirect costs, also known as overhead and more recently defined by the federal government as Facilities and Administration (F&A), are those costs that UMass incurs for common or joint objectives that cannot be identified easily with a particular project. Such costs are for UMass facilities and administrative services as a whole. 

The following are some examples of the pooled costs used by the university in determining its indirect cost rates: 

  • Maintaining and operating a physical plant 
  • Utilities 
  • General administration 
  • Library 
  • Use of capital assets 

Application

Indirect costs are assessed on a percentage basis against the direct costs of the project including salary, fringe, supplies, administrative costs, travel, consultants, subawards, maintenance contracts, etc. Tuition Charges are always exempt from indirect costs. 

Important considerations: 

Indirect cost rates vary according to the following factors: 

Project type 

Project types include: 1) Research; 2) Instruction; or 3) Other sponsored activities such as conference funding and short term workshops.  

Research 

Sponsored Research means all research and development activities that are sponsored by federal and non-federal agencies and organizations. This term includes activities involving the training of individuals in research techniques where such activities utilize the same facilities as other research and development activities and where such activities are not included in the instruction function. 

Research seeks fuller knowledge of a subject and involves investigation aimed at the discovery of new facts or revision of accepted theories. Research projects may include laboratory work, testing and evaluation, questionnaires, pre- and post-tests, and statistical analysis. 

Instruction 

Sponsored Instruction means the teaching and training activities of an institution established by grant, contract, or cooperative agreement. These activities may be offered for credits toward a degree or certificate or on a non-credit basis, and may be offered through regular academic departments or through separate divisions, such as summer school or extension. (Research training is not included; it is included under Research above.) 

Instruction is used when the primary purpose of the project involves training, curriculum development, instruction, demonstration, or efforts to improve pedagogical methods.  Instructional projects may include some elements of research, particularly if new techniques of instruction or curriculum content are being developed. 

Examples 
  • Any project for which the purpose is to instruct any student at any location; recipients of this instruction may be UMass students or staff, teachers or students in elementary or secondary schools, or the general public 
  • Curriculum development projects at any level, including projects which involve evaluation of curriculum or teaching methods; such evaluation may be considered “research” only when the preponderance of activity is data collection, evaluation and reporting 
  • Projects which involved UMass students in community service activities for which they are receiving academic credit. 
  • Activities funded by awards to departments or schools for the support of students 
  • Dissertation work funded by grants, including grants for travel in relation to a dissertation 
  • Programs bringing local students on campus for classes 
  • General support for the writing of textbooks or reference books, video or software to be used as instructional materials. 
Other Sponsored Activities 

Other Sponsored Activities are programs and projects sponsored by federal and non-federal agencies which involve the performance of work other than instruction and organized research. They usually involve community engagement.

Examples include health service projects, community service programs, non-credit community education, and conferences. 

Sponsor Type

Sponsor types include: Federal, industry, non-Massachusetts governmental agencies; foundations and non-profits; Commonwealth of Massachusetts and local government agenciesKeep in mind that the prime source of funds is often the determining factor of defining whether a project has a federal or non-federal rate. For example, if the Commonwealth of Massachusetts receives federal funding and issues a subaward to UMass, if federal terms and conditions of the federal prime flow down, indirect costs would generally be budgeted at the federal rate and not the Commonwealth of Massachusetts indirect cost rate. When in doubt, check with your business manager or OPAS contact. 

Sponsor-mandated Restrictions

If the sponsor does not allow, or limits the indirect cost rate, the sponsor guidelines or other published sponsor policy must be provided to your business manager and to OPAS.  

  • When in doubt, contact your business manager and/or OPAS as early as possible.  
  • If the rate is not supported by a published policy or in written guidelines that applies to all applicants, the applicable indirect cost rates must be budgeted.
  • Emails from sponsors do not suffice as adequate documentation. It must be a published restriction.
  • On the Kuali Questionnaire, check Yes to indirect cost variance and further check Sponsor-mandated.

TDC vs. MTDC vs. Total Project Costs

Indirect costs vary depending on the indirect cost base. Indirect costs are assessed either on a Total Direct Cost (TDC) basis or a so-called Modified Total Direct Cost basis (MTDC) or in some cases Total Project Costs. Check sponsor guidelines for direction. 

If the guidelines are inconclusive, please confer with your business manager or with the OPAS pre-award administrator assigned to that particular sponsor. 

Total Direct Cost basis (TDC) 

  • Indirect costs are assessed on all direct costs less the tuition charge. 
  • Tuition Charge is always exempt from indirect costs. 
  • TDC is the default base for foundations/non-profits unless the guidelines specify otherwise. 
  • Consult sponsor guidelines for applicable rates/bases. 
Indirect costs limited to percentage of total direct costs

To determine how much direct costs are allowed, divide total costs by 1.XX where XX is the indirect cost rate expressed as a decimal (e.g. 30% = 0.30).

  • Total Project Costs/(1.XX) = Maximum Direct Costs
  • Direct Costs x F&A rate = Indirect Costs
  • Maximum Direct Costs + Indirect Costs = Total Project Costs
Example 1: Total costs limited to a specific amount

Applicants may request up to $100,000, and the F and A rate is limited to 30% of total direct costs.

  • $100,000 (TPC) / 1.30 (1.F&A rate) = $76,923.08 (maximum total direct costs)
  • $76,923.08 (TDC) x 0.30 (F&A rate) = $23,076.92 (IDC)
  • $76,923.08 + $23,076.92 (IDC) = $100,000 (TPC)

How to enter F&A rate into Kuali: Since this is a percentage of TDC, just select the F&A rate of 30% TDC in budget settings.

Modified Total Direct Cost basis (MTDC) 

Indirect costs are NOT assessed on the following costs: 

  • Equipment (with a unit cost of $5,000) 
  • Tuition 
  • Subaward costs in excess of $25,000 (indirects only assessed on the first $25,000 of each subaward) 
  • Patient care costs 
  • Rental costs of off-site facilities (not owned by UMass) 
  • Fellowships and scholarships 
  • Capital expenditures (construction costs) 
  • Participant support costs

Indirect Costs as a Percent of Total Project Costs

Some sponsors will calculate indirect costs as a percentage of total projects costs (including both direct and indirect costs) or in other words, using the total sponsor request, as the base. 

Kuali does not have functionality to use a rate on Total Project Costs (aka TFFA, Total Award, etc.). When the F&A limit is a percentage of the total costs, then we need to convert the rate into a TDC rate, using this formula:

  • Total Costs multiplied by percentage rate = X where X is Total Indirect Costs
  • Total Costs minus X = Y where Y is Total Direct Costs
  • X divided by Y = percentage of Total Direct Costs

Another way to calculate this is to take the rate stated and divide it by 1 minus the rate.

  • X = The Sponsor Limited F&A of TPC
  • Y = The Rate to Enter into ERA
  • Y= X/(1-X)
Example 2a. Total costs limited to a specific amount

Applicants may request up to $100,000 total project costs, and the indirect costs may not exceed 30% of costs:

  • $100,000 (TPC) x (1.0 – 0.30) = $70,000 (TDC)
  • $100,000 (TPC) x 0.30 = $30,000 (IDC)
  • To determine the TDC percentage rate: Y = 0.30/(1-0.30) = 0.4286 = 42.86% TDC
Example 2b: No maximum total costs indicated

The F&A rate is limited to 8% of total award, and the PI only needs $60,000 for direct costs:

  • $60,000 (TDC) / (1.0 – 0.08) = $65,217 (TPC)
  • $65,217 x 0.08 = $5,217 (IDC)
  • $60,000 + $5,217 = $65,217 (TPC)
  • To determine the TDC percentage rate: Y= 0.08/(1-0.08) = 0.08695 = 8.695% TDC

On-Off Campus Indirect Cost Determination

There are two scenarios that drive when the off-campus indirect cost rate can be used. 

Scenario #1 applies when all project activities are performed in facilities that are: 

  • Not owned by UMass Amherst and; 
  • Rent is directly allocated/budgeted to the project(s) 

Scenario #2 where project activities are performed in facilities provided at no cost by another organization for longer than one semester or three summer months.  

  • Qualifying project personnel must be budgeted for that period of time (1 semester or three summer months) 
  • Qualifying project personnel must be at the off-campus location continuously without interruption – there cannot be regular or intermittent travel back to UMass during that period. 
  • Home offices do not qualify as “off-campus 
  • the off-campus facility must be used in place of UMass Amherst facilities 
  • The direct costs must be apportioned between on-campus and off-campus components. Each portion will bear the appropriate rate see the Fact Sheet for current rates. 

For all other conditions which do not meet the requirements of the two scenarios listed above, the on-campus indirect cost rate shall be applied to the modified total direct costs of the project. 

Processing Procedures 

An explanation of the indirect cost rate(s) applied in the project budget should be included in the budget explanation to the sponsor. This should be done by providing a table or tables that provides a distinction between on and off-campus costs. 

Unrestricted Grant

Unrestricted grants carry a reduced indirect cost rate but are also very strictly defined – the award and the project are, simply put, unrestricted. See detailed description below: 

Unrestricted grants carry an indirect cost rate of 10% TDC for any award $1000 or more. The F&A is assessed in all cases. In order to be classified as an unrestricted grant, the faculty members must be free to use the funds in any way that benefits the university by supporting their general research interests. They differ from regular grants and contracts in that there can be no formal requirements by the sponsor for financial or technical reports and the sponsor has no claim whatsoever to any intellectual property rights that may result from projects supported by unrestricted grants. Because of the unrestricted nature of the project, it is anticipated that there is no attributed level of effort on behalf of the PI. If the PI feels that a level of effort is required, the PI must report that level of effort to OPAS and the award letter must provide the sponsors acknowledgment and approval that the PI use this money for appropriate salary per university guidelines. 

For current rates, see the Fact Sheet. 

Indirect Cost Waivers 

If a reduced indirect cost rate or total waiver of indirect costs is deemed desirable by the PI, a request can be submitted for consideration by the Vice Chancellor for Research and Engagement all applicants

  • The VCRE may reduce indirect cost rates with substantial justification. 
  • Reductions are an exception rather than the rule. 
  • For the process to seek such a reduction, see the Indirect Cost Waiver/Reduction Form.
  • Read the instructions carefully. 
  • Indirect cost waiver requests must be submitted to the VCRE via the dean with chair input no later than 12 days before the sponsor deadline. 

Budget Justification

Budget Justification Allison Koss

Overview

A well-developed budget is accompanied by a budget explanation or narrative, also known as a budget justification. A complete and realistic budget justification demonstrates that your project is well conceived. It also tends to minimize the chances that sponsors will arbitrarily reduce or eliminate budget categories. Sponsors have a good idea of what a project should cost, and generally know when you are over or under budgeting. See some examples/templates below.

The budget is reviewed by OPAS and the sponsor to verify that costs are reasonable, allowable, allocable and necessary to carry out the proposed project, and if it conforms to the sponsor's instructions. During award negotiations a budget is sometimes subjected to further analysis by the sponsor's audit staff. Thus it is important to maintain all the documentation and justification you can assemble for each cost element and category, in case the sponsor questions items and estimates.

For newcomers to the process, consult with experienced faculty or staff within your department for advice, or contact the OPAS pre-award administrator assigned by sponsor to discuss potential costing.

The budget justification is a categorical description of the proposed costs. Generally, it explains staffing and supply/service consumption patterns, the methods used to estimate/calculate (including escalation or inflation factors) and other details such as lists of items that make up the total costs for a category. The budget justification should address each of major cost categories (salaries, fringe benefits, equipment, travel, supplies, other direct costs and indirect costs), as well as any additional categories required by the sponsor.

A thoroughly written justification that explains both the necessity and the basis for the proposed costs must accompany the budget. The justification section is critical as it enables the principal investigator to emphasize the importance of essential project costs. A budget that is adequately and appropriately justified is the best way to assure a positive cost analysis by the sponsor.

Below are some helpful tips:

  • Organize the budget justification listing items in the same order and format as the sponsor’s budget categories.
  • Only include budgeted items. Some sponsors like NSF will disqualify a proposal if contributed items are listed. Do not list cost-shared items unless cost-sharing is mandated by the sponsor.
  • Budget narrative must match the budget in terms of dollar amounts and language — double check everything.
  • Explain why items are essential in relation to the aims and methodology of the project as well as meeting the goals of the project.
  • Explain the line items. Do not merely restate the proposed expenditure.
  • Provide detail sufficient to justify the rationale for acquiring the item under the proposed project.

Budget Justification Examples and Templates

Salaries and Wages

Also see Personnel Costs.

  • List all personnel and positions to be paid with project funds and briefly describe their role in the project.
  • Only list paid personnel unless cost-sharing is mandated by the sponsor.
  • In addition to how the sponsor requires effort to be shown, also always list effort in person months for faculty and staff. For Graduate Research Assistants, list number of months and hours per week.
  • When listing effort, do not use approximations. Show effort out to two decimal points (e.g. 1.52 months) as applicable.
  • Include a COLA of 3% to 5%. Verify any sponsor-driven limitations on COLAs. Currently for example, UMass budgets only 2% with the NIH.

Consultants

Also see Consultants and Subrecipients.

  • List consultant name and describe in detail the services to be performed.
  • Include number of days, rate of compensation, and total amount per year. This must be corroborated in a letter provided by the consultant.

Materials and Supplies

Also see Materials and Supplies.

  • Only request supplies directly relevant (allocable) to the research plan.
  • Explain in detail why specific supplies are needed.
  • Do not request general office supplies if federal (allowability).
  • Budgeting should be based on actual experience or quotes (reasonableness).
  • Use an inflation factor (COLA) for future years (verify any sponsor limits).
  • The breakdown should be more detailed when the total supplies cost is substantial. Where large amounts of supplies or expensive items are budgeted, specify items and justify their necessity.

Equipment & Travel

Also see Equipment & Travel.

  • Definition of Equipment: A unit cost of $5,000 or more and a useful life of at least one year.
  • Get accurate price quotes.
  • Explain why the equipment is needed in support of the project aims.
  • Confirm equipment is dedicated to the project. If equipment is shared with other projects, budget an amount that corresponds to expected project use and verify the rationale. Split funding of equipment should only generally occur with large equipment purchases.
  • Ask for reasonable amounts.
  • Indicate basis of cost (historical, quotes, etc.).
  • State exactly which relevant meeting/conference you plan to attend. If not known, provide examples.
  • Include breakdown of costs for airfare, meals, lodging, and ground transportation. Some sponsors like NSF will reject a proposal if insufficient details are provided.
  • Include number of people, number of days, purpose and location of travel.
  • Budgeting should be based on actual experience or quotes.
  • Use an inflation factor (COLA) for future years.
  • Avoid partial financing of travel requirements.

Other Direct Costs

Also see Other Direct Costs.

  • Fee-for-service: Justify use; show the university approved rate, or if an external vendor, their published rate.
  • Equipment maintenance and service contract (justify need) and verify that the covered equipment is dedicated to the project;  If proportional use on the covered equipment is anticipated, provide the proportional cost/use rationale;  Cost/usage should not generally fall below 50%; Note the basis of the cost (quotes, etc.).
  • Software should be identified by brand, type, and unit cost; verify in the justification that it is dedicated to the project; and provide a strong justification for why it is needed especially emphasizing what aspect of the project will benefit from its use; the software should not be general purpose software but rather specialized in a manner that supports the specific technical aims of the project; verify basis of cost (quotes, catalog prices, etc.)
  • Human Subject Payments (breakdown # of subjects and cost to each).
  • Provide details for publication costs.
  • Give detailed breakdown of each cost.
  • Tuition — provide details. See the Fact Sheet for current rates and provide them to the sponsor. Use the Kuali Salary Guide found here.

Subawards/Subrecipients

Also see Consultants and Subrecipients.

  • Clearly identify subrecipient organizations and their key personnel.
  • Briefly explain their scope of work.
  • Explain the need to subaward with a particular organization, expertise of subrecipient PI/key personnel, institutional facilities.
  • Keep in mind that subrecipients will provide their own detailed budgets and corresponding budget justifications. These should be separate and distinct from the UMass budget and budget justification and follow the UMass budget and budget justification.

Cost Restrictions on Federally-Supported Projects

Cost Restrictions on Federally-Supported Projects Allison Koss

Federally-supported projects are subject to several cost restrictions, which are outlined in the OMB Uniform Guidance. Because the university must treat like costs in a similar manner, these restrictions have been implemented in the Administrative Costing Requirements for Proposals and Awards policy. Cost categories that the university normally charges as indirect costs must meet specific requirements to be justified as direct costs.

These costs include: 

  • Administrative or clerical salaries
  • Office supplies
  • Postage
  • Telephone service

These costs are likely to be more highly scrutinized and must be well-justified. Be sure to review the resources below, and check in with your department or college business manager or grant administrator, OPAS Pre-award administrator, or the R&E Help Desk with questions.

 

Policies and Resources Affecting Administrative/Secretarial Compensation