Cohen, A. L., Starns, J. J., Rotello, C. M., & Cataldo, A. M. (in press). Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.
Starns, J. J., Cataldo, A. M., & Rotello, C. M. (2019). Blinded inference: An opportunity for mathematical modelers to lead the way in research reform. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2, 223–228. doi: 10.1007/s42113-019-00040-3
Starns, J. J., Cataldo, A. M., Rotello, C. M., et al. (2019). Assessing theoretical conclusions with blinded inference to investigate a potential inference crisis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2, 335-349. doi: 10.1177/2515245919869583
Dillon, B., Andrews, C., Rotello, C. M., & Wagers, M. (2019). A new argument for co-active parses during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 45, 1271-1286. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000649
Rotello, C. M., Heit, E., & Kelly, L. J. (2019). Do modals identify better models? A comparison of signal detection and probabilistic models of inductive reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 112, 1-24. Doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.03.004
Rotello, C. M., Kelly, L. J., & Heit, E. (2018). The shape of ROC curves in shooter tasks: Implications for best practices in analysis. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1): 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.171
Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2018). Putting replication in its place. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000687
Rotello, C. M. (2017). Signal detection theories of recognition memory. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition (Vol. 4: Cognitive Psychology of Memory). Elsevier.
Rotello, C. M., & Chen, T. (2016). ROC curve analyses of eyewitness identification decisions: An analysis of the recent debate. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1:10. DOI 10.1186/s41235-016-0006-7
Chen, T., Rotello, C. M., & Verhaeghen, P. (2016). A state-trace meta-analysis of the age-related associative memory deficit. In D. Bruno (Ed.), The Preservation of Memory (pp. 56-77). Routledge: New York.
Rotello, C. M., Heit, E., & Dubé, C. (2015). When more data steer us wrong: Replications with the wrong dependent measure perpetuate erroneous conclusions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 944-954. DOI 10.3758/s13423-014-0759-2
Chen, T., Starns, J. J., & Rotello, C. M. (2015). A violation of the conditional independence assumption of discrete state models of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 41, 1215-1222. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000077
Rana, S., Mout, R., Le, N. D. B., Saha, K., Tonga, G. Y, Bain, R. E. S., Miranda, O. R., Rotello, C. M., & Rotello, V. M. (2015). Rapid cell-based drug profiling using a multichannel nanoparticle-fluorescent protein sensor. Nature Nanotechnology, 10, 25-69. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.285 [My contribution was statistical.]
Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2014). The neural correlates of belief bias: activation in inferior frontal cortex reflects response rate differences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00862.
Cohen, A. L., Rotello, C. M., & Fiorenzo, L. M. (2014). Memory for license plates. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 347-360.
Pazzaglia, A. M., Staub, A., & Rotello, C. M. (2014). Encoding time and the mirror effect in recognition memory: Evidence from eyetracking. Journal of Memory & Language, 75, 77-92.
Starns, J. J., Rotello, C. M., & Hautus, M. J. (2014). Recognition memory zROC slopes for items with correct versus incorrect source decisions discriminate the dual process and unequal variance signal detection models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 40, 1205-1225.
Hayes, B. K., Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2014). Memory, reasoning and categorization: Parallels and common mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology. 5:529. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00529
White, C. N., Kapucu, A., Bruno, D., Rotello, C. M., & Ratcliff, R. (2014). Response bias for emotional words in immediate recognition memory is due to relatedness rather than emotional valence. Cognition & Emotion, 28, 867-880. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.858028
Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2014). Traditional difference-score analyses of reasoning are flawed. Cognition, 131, 75-91.
Dube, C., Rotello, C. M., & Pazzaglia, A. M. (2013). The statistical accuracy and theoretical status of discrete-state MPT models: Reply to Batchelder and Alexander (2013). Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1213-1220.
Dube, C., Payne, L., Sekuler, R., & Rotello, C. M. (2013). Paying attention to attention in recognition memory: Insights from models and electrophysiology. Psychological Science, 24, 2398-2408.
Pazzaglia, A. M., Dube, C., & Rotello, C. M. (2013). A critical comparison of discrete-state and continuous models of recognition memory: Implications for recognition and beyond. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1173-1203.
Starns, J. J., Pazzaglia, A. M., Rotello, C. M., Hautus, M. J., & Macmillan, N. A. (2013). Unequal-strength source zROC slopes reflect criteria placement and not (necessarily) memory processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1377-1392
Dube, C., Starns, J. J., Rotello, C. M., & Ratcliff, R. (2012). Beyond ROC curvature: Strength effects and response time data support continuous-evidence models of recognition memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 67, 389-406.
Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2012). The pervasive effects of argument length on inductive reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning (Special issue on Reasoning and Argumentation), 18, 244-277.
Heit, E., Rotello, C. M., & Hayes, B. K. (2012). Relations between memory and reasoning. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 52 (pp. 57-101). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Starns, J. J., Rotello, C. M., Ratcliff, R. (2012). Mixing strong and weak targets provides no evidence against the unequal-variance explanation of zROC slopes: A comment on Koen & Yonelinas (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 793-801.
Dube, C., & Rotello, C. M. (2012). Binary ROCs in perception and recognition memory are curved. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 130-151.
Dube, C., Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2011). The belief bias effect is aptly named: A reply to Klauer and Kellen (2011). Psychological Review, 118, 155-163.
Dube, C., Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2010). Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: It’s a response bias effect. Psychological Review, 117, 831-863.
Kapucu, A., Macmillan, N. A., & Rotello, C. M. (2010). Positive and negative remember judgments and ROCs in the plurals paradigm: Evidence for alternative decision strategies. Memory & Cognition, 38, 541-554. PMCID2887610
Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2010). Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 805-812.
Wong, M., & Rotello, C. M. (2010). Conjunction errors and semantic transparency. Memory & Cognition, 38, 47-56. PMC2905215
Rotello, C.M., & Heit, E. (2009). Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1317-1330.
Masson, M. E. J., & Rotello, C. M. (2009). Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: Implications for studies of metacognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 509-527.
Evans, K., Rotello, C. M., Li, X., & Rayner, K. (2009). Scene perception and memory revealed by eye movements and ROC analyses: Does a cultural difference truly exist? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 276-285. [PMCID: PMC2668147]
Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2008). Modeling two kinds of reasoning. Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 1831-1836. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Hautus, M., Macmillan, N. A., & Rotello, C. M. (2008). Toward a complete decision model of item and source recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 889-905.
Cohen, A. L., Rotello, C. M., & Macmillan, N. A. (2008). Evaluating models of remember-know judgments: Complexity, mimicry, and discriminability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 906-926.
Kapucu, A., Rotello, C. M., Ready, R. E., & Seidl, K. N. (2008). Response bias in ‘remembering’ emotional stimuli: A new perspective on age differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 703-711.
Rotello, C. M., & Zeng, M. (2008). Analysis of RT distributions in the remember-know paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 825-832.
Rotello, C. M., Masson, M. E. J., & Verde, M. F. (2008). Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 389-401.
Rayner, K., Miller, B., & Rotello, C. M. (2008). Eye movements when looking at print advertisements: The goal of the viewer matters. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 697-707.
Cave, K. R., Cohen, A. L., Rotello, C. M., McCaffrey, A, Ross, M. G., Zeng, M., Zivot, M., Li, X., & Chang, K. (2008). Using eye movements to understand complex visual comparisons. In K. Rayner, D. Shen, X. Bai, & G. Yan (Eds.), Cognitive and Cultural Influences on Eye Movements (pp. 141-156), Tianjin People's Press/Psychology Press.
Rotello, C. M., & Macmillan, N. A. (2008). Response bias in recognition memory. In A. S. Benjamin & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Skill and Strategy in Memory Use, Vol. 48 (pp. 61-94). London: Academic Press.
Dougal, S., & Rotello, C. M. (2007). “Remembering” emotional words is based on response bias, not recollection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 423-429.
Verde, M. F., & Rotello, C. M. (2007). Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 254-262.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., Hicks, J. L., & Hautus, M. (2006). Interpreting the effects of response bias on remember-know judgments using signal-detection and threshold models. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1598-1614.
Rotello, C. M., & Macmillan, N. A. (2006). Remember-know models as decision strategies in two experimental paradigms. Journal of Memory & Language,55, 479-494.
Verde, M. F., Macmillan, N. A., & Rotello, C. M. (2006). Measures of sensitivity based on a single hit rate and false-alarm rate: The accuracy, precision, and robustness of d', Az, and A'. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 643-654.
Macmillan, N. A., & Rotello, C. M. (2006). Deciding about decision models of remember and know judgments: A reply to Murdock. Psychological Review,113, 657-665.
Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2005). Are there two kinds of reasoning? Proceedings of the Twenty-five Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 923-928. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., Reeder, J. A., & Wong, M. (2005). The remember response: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 865-873.
Macmillan, N. A., Rotello, C. M., & Verde, M. F. (2005). On the importance of models in interpreting remember-know experiments: Comments on Gardiner et al.’s (2002) meta-analysis. Memory, 13, 607-621.
Verde, M. F., & Rotello, C. M. (2004). Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1062-1066.
Macmillan, N. A., Rotello, C. M., Miller, J. O. (2004). The sampling distributions of Gaussian ROC statistics. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 406–421.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Reeder, J. A. (2004). Sum-Difference Theory of Remembering and Knowing: A Two-Dimensional Signal Detection Model. Psychological Review, 111, 588–616.
Verde, M. F., & Rotello, C. M. (2004). ROC curves show that the revelation effect is not a single phenomenon. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 560-566.
Verde, M. F., & Rotello, C. M. (2003). Does familiarity change in the revelation effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 739-746.
Pollatsek, A., & Rotello, C. M. (2002). Attention, perception, and memory. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Oxford, U.K. [http://www.eolss.net]
Rayner, K., Rotello, C. M., Stewart, A. J., Keir, J., & Duffy, S. A. (2001). Integrating text and pictorial information: Eye movements when looking at print advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 219-226.
Rotello, C. M. (2000). Recall processes in recognition memory. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 40 (pp. 183-221). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2000). Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing. Memory and Cognition, 28, 907-922.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 67-88.
Stern, E. R., & Rotello, C. M. (2000). Memory characteristics of recently imagined events and real events experienced previously. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 569-590.
Dougal, S., & Rotello, C. M. (1999). Context effects in recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 112, 277-295.
Rotello, C. M. (1999). Metacognition and memory for nonoccurrence. Memory, 7, 43-63.
Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (1999). Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for Recall-to-reject? Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 432-453.
Catrambone, R., Jones, C. M., Jonides, J., & Seifert, C. (1995). Reasoning about curvilinear motion: Using principles or analogy. Memory & Cognition, 23, 368-373.
Jones, C. M. (1994). Construction of a mental model. In R. F. Lorch, Jr., & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of Coherence in Reading, (pp. 335-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jones, C. M., & Heit, E. (1993). An evaluation of the total similarity principle: Effects of similarity on frequency judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 799-812.
Jonides, J., & Jones, C. M. (1992). Direct coding for frequency of occurrence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 368-378.