New York City Panel on Climate Change 2015 Report, Chapter 1: Climate Observations and Projections

TitleNew York City Panel on Climate Change 2015 Report, Chapter 1: Climate Observations and Projections
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsHorton, Radley M., Bader Daniel A., Kushnir Yochanan, Little Christopher, Blake Reginald, and Rosenzweig Cynthia
JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Pagination18 - 35
Date Published01/2015
Keywordsclimate projections, impacts of global change, observed climate

Because of incomplete knowledge about exactly how much climate change will occur, choosing among policies for reducing future damages requires prudent risk management (Yohe and Leichenko, 2010; Kunreuther et al., 2013). Given differing risk tolerances among stakeholders, a risk management approach allows for a range of possible climate change outcomes to be examined with associated uncertainties surrounding their likelihoods. The New York City Panel on Climate Change 2 (NPCC2) projections can be used to inform planning across multiple governmental scales (e.g., city, county, state) in the New York metropolitan region. Such coordinated efforts can serve as test cases for successful local, state, and federal coordination for integrated climate adaptation initiatives. This chapter describes the global climate system, and presents observed temperature and precipitation trends and projections for the region. Chapter 2 (NPCC, 2015) focuses on sea level rise and possible changes in coastal storms. Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 (NPCC, 2015) describe efforts to better understand the region’s vulnerability to coastal flooding during coastal storms. The treatment of likelihood related to the NPCC projections is similar to that developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth and Fifth Assessment Reports (IPCC, 2007; 2013), with six likelihood categories (Box 1.1 and Fig. 1.1). The assignment of climate hazards to these categories is based on observed data, global climate model simulations, published literature, and expert judgment.