Practices in formative assessment
The following practices guide instructor strategies (Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick, 2006; Yale, 2017).
Click each title to learn more about them.
Apply to your course: Resources & Tools
There are several strategies and techniques for conducting formative assessment in your course, ranging from perhaps more traditional and common to more creative and engaging. Read on to consider strategies that are appropriate for your course.
Methods | UMass-supported Tools |
---|---|
Surveys | Zoom polls, Iclicker, Google Form |
Brainstorming/Mind-mapping | Canvas Discussions, Zoom Whiteboard, Lucid Chart, Slides, Pages |
Group work/collaboration | Zoom break-out rooms, G-Suite (Docs, Slides, Sheets, Etc.), Canvas Collaborations, Canvas Pages |
Discussions (written/video/audio | Discussion boards (whole class or small group), VoiceThread , Zoom, Perusall |
Quizzes: multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, true/false, short answer | Canvas Quizzes |
Case Study | Google Docs , Group Blog area, Canvas Pages |
Open-ended questions | Canvas Assignments |
In addition to traditional, common assessment approaches, you may want to consider more creative ways of gathering information from students about their progress and development. CATs, or Classroom Assessment Techniques, designed by Angelo and Cross (1993), can help instructors reconsider their approaches to assessment and incorporate a variety of methods into their course—thus also complying with UDL principles. The chart below highlights some of the 50 tested assessment techniques that are useful in the online teaching format (see the University of California San Diego’s full description of 50 CATs here).
Another excellent resource for CATs is a series of videos and resources sortable by teaching environment, activity type, and teaching problem: see the K. Patricia Cross Techniques Video Library. Examples of CATs useful in online teaching.
CAT | Description | Tools |
---|---|---|
Techniques for Assessing Course-Related Knowledge & Skills | ||
Muddiest Point | Students respond to 1 question: What was the muddiest (most unclear/ confusing) point in ___? |
|
Word Journal | A two-part response. 1: the student summarizes a short text in a single word. 2: the student writes 1 paragraph explaining the word choice. |
|
Concept Maps | Students draw or diagram the mental connection they make between the major concept and the other concepts they learned. |
|
Audio/ Video-taped Protocols | Students work through a problem-solving process, and it is captured to allow instructors to assess metacognition (learner's awareness of and control of thinking). |
|
Directed Paraphrasing | Students paraphrase part of a lesson for a specific audience, demonstrating an ability to translate specialized information into language the clients or customers can understand. |
|
CAT | Description | Tools |
---|---|---|
Techniques for Assessing Learner Attitudes, values, and Self-Awareness | ||
Classroom Opinion Polls | Students indicate a degree of agreement or disagreement with a statement or prompt. |
|
Goal Ranking & Matching | Students list and prioritize 3 to 5 goals they have for their own learning in the course. |
|
Diagnostic Learning Logs | Students write to learn by identifying, diagnosing and prescribing solutions to their own learning problems. |
|
CAT | Description | Tools |
---|---|---|
Techniques for Assessing Learner Reactions to Instruction | ||
Electronic Survey Feedback | Students respond to a question or short series of questions about the effectiveness of the course at key points in the course. |
|
ERSQC2 (Recall, Summarize, Question, Connect & Comment) | Students write brief statements that recall, summarize, question, connect and comment on meaningful points from the previous class. |
|
Assignment/ Exam Assessments | Students respond to 2 or 3 open-ended questions about the value of an assignment/ exam to their learning. |
|
References
Formative Assessments in Online Courses © 2024 by University of Massachusetts Amherst is licensed under CC BY 4.0

“Creative Commons licenses give everyone from individual creators to large institutions a standardized way to grant the public permission to use their creative work under copyright law. From the reuser’s perspective, the presence of a Creative Commons license on a copyrighted work answers the question, What can I do with this work?”- Creative Commons