The Community, Diversity, and Social Justice initiative is predicated on the assumption that meaningful
change is characterized by a cyclical change process that includes assessment, broad dissemination of
results, development of change strategies, action, and reassessment.
This assessment report includes a substantial amount of data for the next step: engaging those in
Academic Affairs in interpreting the assessment data and developing change strategies. We do not pretend
that this assessment is comprehensive, in itself. It complements data from other sources (e.g., the
annual Affirmative Action Plan from the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity, the Diverse Democracy
Study), and various Schools and Colleges may decide to follow it up with additional assessment. Still,
it provides something that the University, to the best of our knowledge, has never had: a comprehensive
survey of the perceptions of workers, across all job classifications, of the state of their everyday work
environment and their understandings of University goals and values. Further, it provides a
representative sampling of student perceptions of the learning environment and learning outcomes.
The next step is for the members (or representative members) of Academic Affairs to review this
assessment report and, from these data:
While this process is easy to describe, it is obviously not so easy to enact, as is true with most
planning of any consequence that involves a complex organization. Still, addressing the issues raised in
this report is not an add-on to other activities since the issues posed in this report are integrally
related to many issues that Academic Affairs is already facing:
Such questions clearly involve weighing priorities and values and open discussion in a range of forums.
For example, some findings may point to action across Academic Affairs, some to action within Schools and
Colleges, some to actions across the University, and some to action in consort with relevant Faculty
Senate Committees.
We call upon the senior academic leadership to lead this planning effort. With the press of many other
demands, it would be all too easy for this report to be filed for later action. It is in the
University's best interests not to let that happen. In this time of change, if we, in Academic Affairs
and the University at large, attend to these data and other relevant data regarding diversity, social
justice, and community, then we have the opportunity of creating a more inclusive, equitable learning and
working environment for everyone at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. This is a goal that workers
in Academic Affairs at UMass, across all job classifications, have strongly endorsed. We should
celebrate this affirmation and act upon it.