Medical
School
Worcester
UMass Collaborative Research
Watch II Study
UMass
Amherst

Worc.: Prev.& behav. med. : Projects and studies Biostat & Epi : SPHHS : UMass
HOME

Contact Us
Resources


Overview
Methods
Study Design
Hypothesis
Study Population
Power & Size
Generalizability
Protocol
Intervention
Data Collection
Analysis
Time Line
Human Subjects
Operations
Data
Results

TOP

Study Population

Study Site - The University of Massachusetts Medical Center (UMMC)

The study is conducted on the pts of 29 primary care internists at 2 practice sites of the UMMC. At these 2 sites, these practitioners follow some 27,000 adult pts, with 300 new pts being added each month. Other UMMC primary care sites also are available, but the volume of pts at the 2 sites chosen makes it unnecessary to use other locations. Volume is expected to continue to increase by 10-15% per year over the next several years. The two locations comprise the Benedict Building, the primary outpatient facility at the main UMMC campus, with 24 internists, and the Shrewsbury site, a satellite facility approximately 2.5 miles away, with 5 internists. Within the Benedict Center the physicians are divided into 4 “pods” that function as independent units, so that the size of physician work groups is equivalent at both sites. Follow-up appointments are made at the end of each visit, using a linked computerized appointment system. Laboratory facilities are available at each location.

The study location differs from the original WATCH study which was located at the Fallon Clinic to UMMC. When WATCH began there was only a modest primary care presence at UMMC. Since then primary care at UMMC has grown remarkably, so that there are now 44 primary care internists in our network and adequate numbers of pts to carry out the proposed project successfully within our own institution. At the same time, growth at the Fallon Clinic has slowed with increased managed care competition. Recently the Fallon Clinic sold its hospital (St. Vincent’s) and an undisclosed share of the Clinic itself (it is a for-profit entity) to Orenda, a national for-profit managed care organization, and subsequent to this Orenda itself was purchased by Tenet, an even larger for-profit managed care organization. Given these factors, we elected to carry out the proposed project at UMMC.

Study physicians

There are no significant group differences between the physicians at the study sites. Of the 29 internists, 15 are male and 14 are female; 28 are board certified in internal medicine, one is board-eligible. The mean age of the internists is 39 years. Two are Asian minority. These physicians, although affiliated with an academic medical center, function little differently than the internists at the Fallon Clinic used in WATCH. Clinic time for a Fallon internist is 28 hours/week, for a UMass-Shrewsbury site internist 32 hours per week, and for internists at the UMass-Benedict Center 25 hours/week (allowing for 4 hours of teaching time and greater in-hospital responsibility). The UMass-Benedict MDs see approximately 60 patients/week; the corresponding figure for the Fallon internists in WATCH was 70/week. In fact, 65% of our pts are under managed care contracts, with some 20% of pts in capitated programs (half in a Fallon plan identical to that for the full-time Fallon physicians). Thus our physicians must meet the same time and efficiency demands as other primary care physicians, or we would not be competitive and experience the growth that is in fact occurring.

Patient Population

This randomized controlled trial includes 1200 primary care pts, evenly randomized into the 2 conditions and blocked by gender, physician, and three age intervals (20-34, 35-54, 55-75).

Rationale for Patient Population Chosen

The study population is a primary care population. WATCH was a primary care study, and the WATCH II study builds directly on its results. Our major interest is in altering risk by delivering nutrition change brought about by a combination of practitioner counseling, office support, well-designed group nutritional interventions, and effective systems-based efforts that are synergistic with each other, and are designed to be cost-effective. For pts who already have clinical CHD the lipid-lowering goals are such as to require pharmacologic therapy for the majority. (44) In a primary-care population the opposite is true - pharmacologic therapy is not cost-effective, while nutrition-based interventions can affect very large numbers of pts at very low cost, and thus have the potential to reduce the population disease burden. (67, 92, 93)

Patient Eligibility and Exclusion Criteria

A pt is eligible for this study if he/she meets the following criteria:

1) LDL-C in the highest 25th percentile

2)  is between twenty and seventy-five years of age.

A pt is excluded if he/she has any of the following characteristics: (Telephone Screen)

1. an inability or unwillingness to give informed consent;

2.      is presently or has within the prior two years been on specific pharmacologic therapy to lower lipid levels (e.g., resins, fibric acid derivatives, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, nicotinic acid);

3.      has known coronary heart disease

4.      has been referred to RDs within the prior two years for lipid-lowering intervention;

5.      has a secondary cause of hyperlipidemia (e.g., hypothyroidism, pregnancy);

6.      plans to move out of the area within the study period;

7.      has a psychiatric illness which limits ability to participate;

8.      has no telephone;

9. has melanoma or a cancer other than skin cancer that is not in remission for at least 2 years.

Pts with known CHD are excluded to maintain the primary care paradigm of the study. Pts on drugs that can affect lipid levels (e.g., thiazide diuretics, hormone replacement agents) will not be ex­cluded, provided that they have been on a stable dose of medication for at least 6 months. Such an exclusion would eliminate large numbers of older women from the study. Use of medications, however, will be tracked, and appropriately considered in the analysis phase.

Changes to original protocol

  • The upper age limit was increased from 70 to 75 years on 4/23/00.
  • The upper limits of >300mg/dl for cholesterol and >200 mg/dl for LDL-C were removed.
  • The upper limit of >400 mg/dl for triglyceride was removed with the availability of a direct LDL measurement.

    Additionally, bariatric surgery during the study period rendered a subject ineligible.

Prev.& behav. med. : Projects and studies Biostat & Epi : SPHHS : UMass

© 2003 University of Massachusetts Amherst. Site Policies.
This site is maintained by SPHHS/Data Unit.
Send comments or questions about this web site to dataunit@schoolph.umass.edu.
This page was last modified on January 28, 2004 .