|
||||
|
|
The biggest challenge facing UMass Extension is no longer the specter of failure hanging over the states farmers, according to Jay Healy, Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture. The big challenge, he says particularly for Extensions Agroecology Program is the changing face of agricultural success. Healy is in a unique position to comment on Massachusetts farming, and on the Agroecology Programs role in providing support to the states growers: he is a farmer from the town of Charlemont; he is a former state legislator serving the rural towns of western Franklin County; and he is a member of Extensions Board of Public Overseers. Perhaps most significantly, however, he is outspoken in his belief that Extension still has critical ground to cover in its attempt to meet the rapidly changing needs of what has become one of the strongest sectors of the states economy. Pointing to U.S. Census of Agriculture data recently analyzed by the Universitys Donahue Institute, Healy says more Massachusetts farms are more profitable than ever before. The old myths about the ‘old farm going under dont have anything to do with the reality of the year 2000, he says. We have some real entrepreneurs out there doing very, very well, thank you. That census shows that:
Farmers have learned that they need to deal with the consumer directly, and theyve learned how to earn the consumer dollar, rather than 20 cents on the dollar, said Healy. Thats the good news. The challenge for Extension is that agricultural success has created a whole new set of needs, says Healy. Top-notch research is more important to agriculture than ever before, and timely information can be critical in a rapidly changing global economy. Extension is faced with new demands for service and for direct contact, but struggles to do so without the many county Extension agents who served the states farms a decade ago. Healy points to several of Agroecologys teams including Integrated Pest Management, Tree Fruit, Vegetables/Small Fruit, Turf, and Nursery and Landscape as being particularly successful in getting badly needed information to growers. But Extension has to figure out new ways of getting that good solid information out to our farmers without the help of a lot of those people who have historically done that transfer, and new ways of getting information to flow from some of your research and faculty people to the people who use it. Part of the answer, says Healy, lies in rebuilding the Extension staff by as much as 15 percent, a move that he believes the legislature would support. Part of the answer may also lie with making outreach work as rewarding as teaching for faculty members. And part of the answer may lie in specializing boosting the most successful Agroecology programs at the expense of the least successful. But the most important strategy, says Healy, lies in forming new partnerships, even if that means going outside the traditional Extension role in a land grant university. We have to be become increasingly sophisticated in accessing resources at the University that might or might not be under Extension. We need to figure out how to re-establish those ties and get services that might be provided by the University as a whole, but might not be defined any longer within the Extension mission. Massachusetts farmers need and deserve the kind of support and recognition from the University that other sectors of the advanced state economy receive, insists Healy. He notes that many farmers are Stockbridge School of Agriculture graduates, and remain fiercely loyal to the land-grant university. And unlike leaders of other successful businesses in the state, they arent about to bolt: They arent going to move to Dallas, says Healy Theyre tied to 600,000 acres of land.
|
|||
|
||||