| |
Heads up, knuckle-draggers
a reply to the editors
of
Mens Health
Editors note: Part of the ongoing collaboration
between authors Sut Jhally and Jackson Katz is writing opinion pieces
for the popular media. Some recent examples have been Manhood on
the Mat in the Boston Globe and Put the Blame Where
It Belongs: On Men, in the Los Angeles Times. The previously
unpublished piece that follows was written in response to an offering
in Mens Health magazine.

Definitions that connect masculinity with machismo, hard
drinking, and risk-taking are bad for men, as revealed by levels of alcoholism,
drug addiction, and drunk driving that are much higher among men than
among women.
|
 |
| |
In a grotesque example of
Orwellian doublespeak, the September 2000 issue of Mens Health
featured an article that named UMass a campus where women had recently
been terrorized by what appeared to be a serial rapist as one of
the nations worst colleges for men!
While the article The
10 Best and Worst Colleges for Men was nothing more than
a collection of selective anecdotal musings, some people, especially in
the mainstream media, seem to have taken it seriously. This is unfortunate,
as the list and the rationale behind it reveal nothing about the state
of campus life for men, but much about the insecurities and anxieties
of its frightened authors. Unable to accept that the world has changed
in the last 30 years (for both women and men, and for the better) they
seem to be yearning for a romanticized and mythical past in which men
were men and women accepted their subordinate status.
The rationale of the Mens
Health polemic may be simply stated: Womens studies, feminism,
multiculturalism, enforcement of Title IX, strong sexual harassment policies
BAD. Football, fraternities, the classics, weak sexual
harassment policies GOOD.
Or to put it another way:
Strong women move aside, make way for the babes and bimbos who have remained
free from the evil influence of the feminists. (Watch out
when the appears before any group description the
blacks, the Jews, etc.; you know crude stereotyping is about
to occur. Mens Health does not disappoint.) Drawing from
the lies and myths of the conservative backlash, Mens Health
paints a picture of campus life that flattens the complex world of the
modern university into an insulting caricature.
As men who have spent a lot
of time on college campuses over the past generation, working with men
and women on issues of gender, health, and violence, we offer the following
10 reasons why the advice being doled out by the knuckle-draggers at Mens
Health is not only dangerous for women, but equally unhealthy for
men themselves.
- Feminism is not the enemy. Cultural changes catalyzed
by the modern multicultural womens movement have helped improve
the lives of a generation of men. Far from trapping men, feminism has
helped to free us from unhealthy, confining roles and has allowed us
to explore a wider range of experiences and emotions than were available
to our fathers and grandfathers.
- Womens studies is not the enemy. By turning a critical
eye on the gendered aspects of social, economic, and political life,
womens studies also brought the studies of various masculinities
into sharper focus and has given men greater and richer tools for understanding
our complex and diverse racial, ethnic, class, and sexual experiences.
College courses on mens issues (which the Mens
Health authors reference approvingly) are indebted intellectually,
institutionally, and spiritually to the womens studies movement.
- The mens health movement is a direct outgrowth
of the feminist-led womens health movement. The idea that gendered
aspects of mens lives contribute both to mens potential
health problems as well as to strategies for prevention and treatment
is a concept pioneered by the feminists whom the authors
deride as anti-male.
- Safer campuses are good for men, too. Men who love women
our mothers, sisters, wives, girlfriends, friends, and others
should by definition care about their safety, well-being and
opportunities in life, and welcome policies that are designed to give
them greater physical and emotional support and protection. Such men
should support initiatives on college campuses like womens
centers that promote gender equity, justice, and fairness.
- A lot of women arrive at college as sexual assault/abuse
survivors. In fact, a lot of men dont realize how many of our
female peers are survivors of violence, both within their families and
in dating relationships. A female-friendly college campus, with well-funded
womens resource centers and academically strong womens studies
departments, is often the first safe and welcoming place these women
have encountered. Anything that allows women to come to terms with their
experiences is good, both for them and for the men in their lives.
- Women who feel safe are a lot more fun to be around than
women who feel themselves under constant threat. While Mens
Health ridicules campus-based efforts to encourage better communication
among sexually intimate partners to insure both parties are fully
consenting we are very sure that such efforts have led to more
positive sexual encounters for both women and men.
- Gender relations are not a zero-sum game. The idea that
one sex can improve its quality of life only at the expense of the other
reflects a simplistic and out-dated, battle-between-the-sexes mentality
that ignores the interdependent reality of mens and womens
lives.
- Traditional definitions of masculinity that connect it
with machismo, hard drinking, and risk-taking behaviors are bad for
men, as revealed by levels of alcoholism, drug addiction and drunk driving
that are much higher among men than among women. The contradiction between
the Mens Health stereotype of maleness on the one hand,
and our real needs as interdependent, vulnerable human beings on the
other, feeds into the destructive patterns that overwhelm the lives
of tens of millions of American men.
- Homophobia is bad for all men. In the world as defined
by Mens Health magazine, males are not only hard-drinking,
hard-playing and hard-living. They are also exclusively heterosexual.
The authors offer not one word about gay men or bisexuals. This exclusion
is inherently unhealthy for all men who are not straight. It is also
bad for straight men, who are policed by homophobic attitudes into narrow,
restrictive and unhealthy definitions of masculinity.
- Mens Health lies about the level of
mens violence against women. One of the most consistent findings
of social scientists is that one in five college women has been the
victim of rape or attempted rape. The Mens Health authors
label this a feminist myth, preferring a Department of Education
study that confines itself to rapes reported to the authorities. (According
to the F.B.I., 80 to 90 per cent of sexual assaults are not officially
reported). If Mens Health mistrusts the scientific record
simply because it is conducted by women talk about identity politics
then we suggest its editors look at the findings of two ad men.
James Patterson and Peter Kim, in their 1994 book The Day America
Told the Truth, report that 20 percent of the women in their study
said they had been raped on a date. Duplicity by Mens Health
on this issue encourages men to live in denial about the extent of mens
violence. That is bad for everyone women and men.
Our advice to those men at
Mens Health who were responsible for this regrettable article:
Grow up, get a life and look around you at the incredibly strong and independent
women that the modern multicultural womens movement has made possible.
And, if you are too insecure to celebrate that, then get into therapy
quickly! You are a danger to women and an embarrassment to your
fellow men. (Note: shortly after the 10 Best and Worst Colleges
for Men article was published, the Mens Health editor
was fired).
Sut Jhally and Jackson Katz
[top of page]
|
 |