| |
Reading under the lines

| ETS RUNWAY: UMass researchers believe this
geoglyph, built almost 2,000 years ago in the Nasca River region of
Peru, indicates the location of a fault and underground aquifer that
provided water for the regions early inhabitants. |
I was there on a photo
assignment in 1995 when I stumbled into all this, says DAVID JOHNSON,
an adjunct professor of anthropology at UMass. All this is
a new way of explaining the Nasca Lines of coastal Peru
ancient geoglyphs in the form of animal figures and geometric shapes stretching
for miles across one of the worlds driest deserts, a place that
typically gets less than an inch of rain a year.
The lines have evoked explanations
ranging from ritual pathways to a giant astronomical calendar, from roads
to landing pads for extraterrestrial visitors. The explanation Johnson
came up with, after several years of exploration, was that at least some
of the lines charted the location of important underground sources of
water.
Now retired from high school
teaching in Poughkeepsie, New York, Johnson had been volunteering for
international service organizations for 25 years when, in the course of
helping local Peruvians find a new well, he began to devise the theory
that the famous Nasca lines trapezoids, swirls and other shapes
created nearly 2,000 years ago were clues to places where water
was coming through underground seeps and faults. After all, what could
have been more important to people dependent on irrigation for their survival?
Anthropologist DONALD PROULX
and hydrogeologist STEPHEN MABEE 92G, both UMass faculty, joined
Johnson and began a study of their own to see if there was any scientific
basis in his theories. In a paper presented in Poland, last summer, the
three articulated their findings. Indeed, they said, they found convincing
evidence that many of the geometric Nasca Lines (geoglyphs) mark
the sources and flow of subterranean aquifers which carry water diagonally
across the tributaries of the Rio Grande drainage on the south coast of
Peru.
These are not simple or uncontroversial
findings. Other scientists have promoted a competing theory: that the
lines mark the places where surface water enters the river valleys.
But disagreements among scientists are not merely abstract intellectual
matters. Gaining funding to do more research depends upon persuading foundations
and government agencies that your work is sound.
We want to locate all
the ancient sites, to correlate them with the water sources, says
Proulx. Describing this as a two-year, $100,000 project, the researchers
are now applying for funds to the hydrological science division of the
National Science Foundation. We need to get back, says Proulx.
|
 |