|
Presentation titles are linked to read-only PDF files of the PowerPoint presentations given at the conference
| Wednesday,
June 11 |
Session 1:
Communication/Systematic Planning |
Stakeholder Participation and the Conceptual Site Model
Richard Hammond, USEPA, Atlanta, GA
Building a Consensus Vision using Conceptual Site Models
Logan Hackett, TetraTech EMI, Boulder, CO
Managing Social Risk and Building Social Capital as a Foundation for Innovation in Hazardous Waste Site Management - The Region III/IV DoD/State/EPA
Installation Restoration Partnering Initiative
Joe Foran, Management Edge, Inc., Cumberland, ME |
Session 2:
Triad During RD/RA |
Collaborative Data Sets Increase Success in Remedy Implementation
Chris Hood, CH2M HILL, Navarre, FL
The Use of Future First Planning, Triad, and
Performance-Based Contracting to Accelerate Site Closure at Seymour Johnson AFB
Martin Wangensteen, Bay West, Inc., St. Paul, MN
Programmatic Methods for Addressing Contaminated
Volume Uncertainties
Robert Johnson, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL |
Session 3:
Measurement Techniques |
In Situ Detection and Analysis of Soil Gas Samples
through Ion Mobility Spectroscopy
Ray Carter, Boise State University, Boise, ID
Using Innovative Real-Time Field Analysis to
Characterize a 1,4-Dioxane Plume in Wetlands Using the Triad Approach
Jackson Kiker, ECC, Marlborough, MA
Vertical Profiling Using the Color-Tec® Method to
Identify Source Releases and Delineate CVOC Soil and Groundwater Plumes at the Former Naval
Construction Battalion Center Davisville in North Kingstown, Rhode Island
Scott Anderson, Tetra Tech NUS, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA |
Session 4:
Communication/Systematic Planning |
Distance Collaboration Tools
Jean Balent, USEPA, Washington DC
Demystifying the DMA (Demonstration of Method Applicability)
Stephen Dyment, USEPA, Washington DC
Some Thoughts on Conceptual Site Models
Bradley Call, USACE, Sacramento, CA |
Session 5:
Triad During RD/RA |
Integration of Flux-Based Methods and Triad Principles
for DNAPL Site Management, Part I: Remediation Design and Assessment (tentative)
Suresh Rao, Purdue University
Use of SADA to Expedite a Collaborative Soil Removal Action
Jim Wulff, Tetra Tech EM Inc., Boulder, CO
Real-time Remediation Performance Optimization
William Girolamo, Environmental Data Solutions Group, LLC, Foothill Ranch, CA |
Session 6:
Measurement Techniques |
High Resolution Groundwater Characterization Methods and the Triad Approach
Seth Pitkin, Stone Environmental, Inc., Montpelier, VT
Evaluation of the Waterloo Profiler as a Dynamic Site
Investigation Tool
Maelle Duquoc, Environmental Resources Management, Boston, MA
Implementing the Triad Approach Utilizing Membrane Interface Probe to Streamline Characterization
Maria Watt, Camp, Dresser & McKee, Edison, NJ |
Session 7:
Communication/Systematic Planning |
Reasons for Using Sound Science and QA/QC Processes
and Procedures
James Mc Ateer, QA/QC Solutions, LLC, Salem, OR
Enhancing Communication Amongst All Team Members To
Benefit Systematic Project Planning
Raymond Franson, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Lee's Summit, MO
Integration of Triad into Site Management Planning
Thomas Palaia, CH2M Hill, Kittredge, CO |
Session 8:
Triad During RD/RA |
Combining In Situ Remedial Technologies with a Dynamic
Work Strategy at High Risk Sites for Beale AFB
Brad Shearer, CH2M HILL, Redding, CA
Implementing the Triad Approach to Enhance the Effectiveness of In-Situ Chemical Oxidation Applications
Camillo Coladonato, Environmental Resources Management, Boston, MA
Triad Isn’t Just for Characterization Anymore: a Case Study on the Use of Triad Elements during Remedy Implementation
Travis Shaw, USACE, Seattle, WA |
Session 9:
Measurement Techniques |
Using Mobile Measurement Computing and Communication
Devices for Conceptual Site Model Refinement
Louis Martino, Argonne National Laboratory, Washington, DC
Hydraulic Parameter and Mass Flux Distribution Using the High-Resolution Piezocone and GMS
Mark Kram,
Groundswell
Three-Dimensional Depiction of Coal Tar in Soils and Sediments within the Overburden Stratigraphic Framework Using TarGOST®
Scott Saroff, CH2M HILL, Manlius, NY |
| Advanced
Workshops |
- Advanced
Design Application and Data Analysis for Field-Portable
XRF
- Beyond Triad: Characterization and Long Term Management of GW Contaminant Plumes
|
| Thursday,
June 12 |
Session
10:
Triad Implementation |
Triad: Why Isn’t it Used More?
Stuart Nagourney, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ
Advancing Triad in New Jersey through Laboratory Certification
Stuart Nagourney, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ
Programmatic Implementation of the Triad Approach within a
State Reimbursement Program
Nicholas Nigro, Environmental Chemistry Consulting Services, Inc., Madison, WI |
| Session
11: Case Studies |
Triad Case Study: Innovative High Resolution ERI
Used in Real-time to Guide Soil Boring/Well Placement and Remediation; Elusive LNAPL
Sources Located Rapidly at Lower Cost
Stuart McDonald, Aestus, LLC, Loveland, CO
A Triad Case Study: Finding an Unexpected Trichloroethylene
Source Area
Shane DeGross, Sullivan International Group Inc., Orangevale, CA
|
Session
12:
Dynamic Work Strategies |
Real Time CSM Visualization and Feedback
John Sohl, Columbia Technologies, Baltimore, MD
Maximizing Use of Geological/Hydrogeological
Data in Conceptual Site Model Development
Jacqueline Burton, Sundance Environmental and Energy Specialists, Ltd, Santa Fe, NM
Direct Sensing Probes, Collaborative Data Sets
and Rapid CSM Advancement
James Mack, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ |
Session
13:
Triad Implementation |
Using Triad at Multiple Sites to Enhance Data Representativeness
Joe Fiacco, Environmental Resources Management, Boston, MA
Improving Transparency in the Environmental
Restoration Process
Bradley Call, USACE, Sacramento, CA
The Triad Decision Point – Efficiency,
Value and Budget Control
Arthur Bogen, Planner, Valley Council of Governments, Derby, CT |
| Session
14: Case Studies |
Using Triad Approach to Manage Uncertain Decisions
for a Chlorinated Ethene Contaminated Site in Taiwan
Wan-Chi Cho, Guan-Cheng Environ Tech. Protection Co., Ltd., Taiwan
Application of the Triad Approach to the Investigation of
a Remote Facility: Driftwood Bay Radio Relay Station, Unalaska Island, Alaska
Stephen Witzmann, Jacobs Engineering, Anchorage, AK
Use of a Collaborative Dataset to Enhance Data Representativeness
Louis Burkhardt, Raytheon Company, Billerica, MA |
Session
15:
Dynamic Work Strategies |
Case Study – Using Real-Time Field Measurements
and Data Visualization for Efficient Site Assessment and Remedy Selection
Stephen S. Boynton, Subsurface Environmental Solutions, LLC, Andover, MA
Tools and Approaches for Managing Multi-Site,
Multi-Year, Large-Volume Datasets in Order to Allow and Enhance Triad Implementation
Regina Butler, Portage Environmental, Cocoa Beach, FL |
Session
16:
Triad Implementation |
Creating a Decision Hierarchy and Heuristic Project
Designs
Robert Howe, Tetra Tech EM Inc., Boulder, CO
The Triad Approach in Europe – Progress
and Barriers
Tim Hart, Secretary of FASA, Cybersense Biosystems Limited, Abingdon, UK
Effective Funding Management Approaches for
Triad Investigations
Sharon Budney, CDM, Edison, NJ |
Session
17:
Case Studies |
Triad Case Study: Expedited VOC Source Area Investigation
at Naval Base San Diego
Karen Collins, Richard Brady & Associates, San Diego, CA
Characterizing a Complex TCE Groundwater Plume,
Eliminating Suspected Source Areas, and Reducing Investigation Costs for a RCRA RFI at Shaw
AFB, SC
Jonathan Shireman, Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., Knoxville, TN
Volatile Organic Compound Investigation in a Complex Glacial Flow System
Seth Kellogg, CDM, Edison, NJ |
Session
18:
Dynamic Work Strategies |
A Strategy for Using Direct Push Technologies and
a Geostatistical Adaptive Sampling Method for the Characterization of Former Manufactured Gas
Plant Sites
Bruce Kjartanson, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario
If you Think you Aren’t Compositing at
Your Site…………………THINK
AGAIN!
Stephen Dyment, USEPA, Washington DC
Minimizing Uncertainty in Triad Investigations
Using Heuristic Sequential Sampling
John Shafer, Sundance Environmental and Energy Specialists, Ltd., Santa Fe, NM |
|
|
