SEIGMA Project Manager Amanda Houpt recently wrote a blog post describing the forum on health impacts of the casino in Springfield sponsored by Partners for a Healthier Community. "We were thrilled to connect with the Western Massachusetts community at this event," she writes. Read more here.
SEIGMA Blog: Assessing Health Impacts of the Springfield Casino
SEIGMA releases Economic Profiles of Host Communities
The SEIGMA team recently completed a series of Economic Profiles of Host Communities, which describe economic conditions before the introduction of casinos in the currently slated Massachusetts casino locations of Everett, Plainville, and Springfield. Created by the Economic and Public Policy research group at the UMass Donahue Institute, these profiles illustrate recent trends and conditions within the host communities’ industrial structure, business community, labor force and residential population. UMass Donahue will update the profiles after casinos are introduced, tracking economic changes in these communities over time. Read them here.
SEIGMA team will present findings at community forum in Springfield
Representatives from the SEIGMA team are participating in a October 21 community forum in Springfield organized by nonprofit group Partners for A Healthier Community (PHC). SEIGMA Co-PI Rachel Volberg, along with SEIGMA Project Manager Amanda Houpt and Mark Melnik of the UMass Donahue Institute, will present findings from the SEIGMA baseline survey and from the economic impact component of the study at the forum. The event is open to the public, and will provide useful information to a wide range of representatives from social services, public health, mental health, economic development, community based organizations, health care workers and community residents. The forum will take place at the PHC offices in the Community Music School, 127 State Street in Springfield, from 10 am to noon. Read more here.
Valley Advocate interviews Volberg in Springfield casino article
The Valley Advocate recently published an article examining changes proposed for the MGM casino in Springfield. SEIGMA Co-PI Rachel Volberg was among those interviewed in the article, talking about how unpredictable the casino's impact will be in the city. “We have a clean snapshot of the state before any casino activity started, and we’ll just have to see how it rolls out over time,” she said. Read more here.
Baseline Survey results generate press coverage across state
The release of baseline survey results by researchers on the Social and Economic Impacts of Gambling in Massachusetts (SEIGMA) study generated significant press coverage across the state.
Peruse the coverage in the links below:
SEIGMA Team Releases Results of Baseline Survey about Gambling Attitudes, Participation, and Problems in Massachusetts
On Thursday, June 11th, the Social and Economic Impacts of Gambling in Massachusetts (SEIGMA) research team from the School of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst released a comprehensive report of findings from a large baseline population survey that assessed Massachusetts residents’ attitudes about gambling, gambling participation, and gambling-related problems. Nearly 10,000 Massachusetts residents completed the survey, making it the largest and most representative gambling survey ever conducted in the United States.
The survey is just one piece of the broader SEIGMA Study that is unique in obtaining information about gambling involvement and problem gambling prevalence prior to the introduction of casino gambling. The project is part of a legislatively mandated research agenda, which is funded and overseen by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC). Findings from this survey—completed well before any casino or slot machine gambling was available in Massachusetts—will be essential in developing strategies to minimize gambling-related harm.
“The most important point is that we are establishing baseline conditions for every socio and economic variable that might be affected by the introduction of casinos,” said MGC Chairman Steve Crosby. “Our researchers will then track changes in those variables over the entire life of the casinos in order to know to a certainty the consequences and to inform data-driven mitigation strategies for any potential negative consequences.”
SEIGMA Principal Investigator Rachel Volberg stated, “Not many people realize how unusual it is for a problem gambling survey to be completed before some new type of gambling becomes available. The Commonwealth is fortunate that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the MGC so clearly and forcefully supported such an effort and I am excited to share our findings before any casinos begin operations in our state.”
Data were collected from September 2013 to May 2014. Respondents were randomly selected to participate in the survey and could complete it online, on paper, or by phone. Respondents were asked about their participation in the following gambling activities: lottery games, raffles, sports betting, bingo, casino gambling, betting on horse racing, wagering against others, and online gambling. The survey also asked about respondents’ attitudes toward gambling, gambling-related problems, prevention awareness, and use of available problem gambling services.
Highlights from the survey include:
- Over half of Massachusetts adults (59%) perceive the impact of gambling expansion on the state to be neutral, beneficial, or very beneficial while 41% perceive the impact to be somewhat or very harmful
- In contrast to this, about half of respondents (46%) perceive the impact of gambling expansion on their own communities to be harmful while a little over a quarter (28%) perceive the impact to be beneficial
- Overall, nearly three quarters of Massachusetts residents (72%) report participating in at least one gambling activity in the past year
- Nearly 6 in 10 people report playing the lottery
- Just under a quarter (22%) of Massachusetts adults report visiting casinos to gamble
- Over half of people who do so (65%) visit casinos in Connecticut
- While a quarter of the population does not gamble, close to 40% gamble yearly, 20% gamble monthly, and 15% gamble weekly
There are significant differences in overall gambling participation associated with gender, age, and race/ethnicity:
- Men are more likely to gamble than women
- Middle-aged adults are more likely to gamble than younger adults
- Whites are more likely to gamble than Hispanics, Blacks or Asians
- The current prevalence of problem gambling in Massachusetts is 1.7% of the adult population
- An additional 7.5% of the population are at-risk gamblers
- Based on the percentages above, it is estimated that between 67,500 and 109,100 adult residents are problem gamblers and between 353,400 and 426,200 adult residents are at-risk gamblers
There were significant differences in problem gambling associated with gender, race/ethnicity, and education:
- Men are 3 times more likely to have a gambling problem than women
- Blacks are 4 times more likely to have a gambling problem than Whites
- Individuals with only a high school diploma are 2 times more likely to have a gambling problem than individuals with a college degree
- About 4 in 10 Massachusetts residents are aware of media campaigns to prevent problem gambling
- However, just over 1 in 10 of adults is aware of non-media prevention programs in schools and communities around the state
- The number of respondents who report desiring or seeking is too small to report, indicating a potentially underserved population that may be in need of treatment or other services
While these key findings offer a lot of information about gambling and gambling-related problems in Massachusetts, the SEIGMA Research Team is planning deeper analyses of the data in coming months. These analyses will examine factors that may contribute to or cause problem gambling, relationships between gambling attitudes and gambling participation, and factors associated with particular types of gambling. In addition to this survey, the SEIGMA Research Team has collected a substantial amount of secondary social and health data. In partnership with the UMass Donahue Institute, the team is also conducting a comprehensive analysis of the economic and fiscal impacts of expanded gambling. All of the data collected by the SEIGMA team will be made public over time, to enable other researchers and stakeholders to interact with the data and conduct their own analyses, adding to the body of knowledge about gambling in Massachusetts.
The SEIGMA team will repeat the survey one year after all of the new gaming facilities have become operational in Massachusetts to measure the impacts of gambling expansion in Massachusetts. Measuring the same behaviors and using the same methods at subsequent points in time will be useful in monitoring changes in attitudes, gambling participation, and problem gambling prevalence in Massachusetts. Results of this and subsequent surveys will be useful in developing data-driven strategies to promote responsible gambling, raise awareness about problem gambling, and design general and targeted prevention and treatment programs for problem gamblers and their families.
View a PDF of the Executive Summary here.
View a PDF of the Full Report here.
SEIGMA Blog: Research Assistants make up vital part of data analysis
SEIGMA Web Manager Matthew Medeiros recently wrote a blog post highlighting the dozen UMass research assistants that joined the project this academic year. The RAs have been hard at work analyzing data for the upcoming release of SEIGMA’s baseline survey results. Read more here.
SEIGMA Blog: Measuring the Economic Effects of Casinos on Local Areas
SEIGMA Expert Advisor Mark Nichols, Ph.D., recently wrote a blog post highlighting a white paper he co-wrote with the UMass Donahue Institute Economic and Public Policy Research Group. The blog examines community matching, one of the methods the SEIGMA team will use to analyze the economic impacts of gaming venues in Massachusetts. Read more here.
SEIGMA Co-PI Volberg wins grant from Massachusetts Gaming Commission for new gambling study
The Massachusetts Gaming Commission recently announced that it will partner with a team led by SEIGMA Co-Principal Investigator Rachel Volberg to conduct a first-of-its-kind, multi-year cohort study to examine how gambling problems develop over time and thus illuminate the causes of problem gambling. This ground-breaking research project, known as the Massachusetts Gambling Impact Cohort (MAGIC) study, will have significant value as it will highlight factors critical to developing strategic and data-driven problem gambling prevention, treatment and recovery support services in Massachusetts. Read the full announcement here.
Check the press coverage of MAGIC and SEIGMA in the links below:
SEIGMA Blog: A Key Resource for Understanding Gambling Impacts
SEIGMA Expert Advisor Laurie Salame recently wrote a blog highlighting “The Social and Economic Impacts of Gambling" report. Published by the Canadian Consortium for Gambling Research, it contains an extensive review of existing literature on the social and economic impacts of gambling. The report also proposes a theoretical framework for future socioeconomic impact studies, which the SEIGMA study uses. Read more here.