University of Massachusetts
SAREO
Student Assessment, Research, and Evaluation Office

   

SARIS REPORT NO. 301
THE ENTERING CLASS AT UMASS:
ACE/CIRP SURVEY, FALL 1995

by
Elizabeth Williams
Judy Connelly
April 1996

TABLE OF CONTENTS

List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ii

List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iii

Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1

Overview of Report Presentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2

Section 1. Freshmen Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
     Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
     Students . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5

Section 2. Academic Preparation and Expectations . . . . . . . . . . . 6
     High School Achievement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
     Self Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
     Academic Expectations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Section 3. Decision to Attend College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
     Reasons for Attending College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
     Reasons for Selecting the University of Massachusetts . . . . . . 9
     Number of Applications and Acceptances . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9

Section 4. Financing College Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10

Section 5. Probable Major and Intended Career . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
     Probable Major . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
     Career Preference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
     Degree Expectations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13

Section 6. Freshmen Lifestyle and Expectations . . . . . . . . . . . .15
     Activities and Interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
     Expected Satisfaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16

Section 7. Life Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
     Trends of Life Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18

Section 8. Social and Political Attitudes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
     Trends in Social and Political Attitudes . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26


LIST OF TABLES

Table 1:   Overview of ACE/CIRP Survey Questionnaire

Table 2:   Family Characteristics of 1995 Freshmen

Table 3:   Individual Characteristics of 1995 Freshmen

Table 4:   High School Grades of 1995 Freshmen

Table 5:   Self-Rating of 1995 Freshmen

Table 6:   Academic Expectations of 1995 Freshmen

Table 7:   Reasons for Attending College in 1995

Table 8:   The Decision to Attend a Particular College in 1995

Table 9:   Changes in Financial Resources

Table 10:  Probable Major of 1995 Freshmen

Table 11:  1995 Freshmen Activities

Table 12:  Non-Academic Expectations of 1995 Freshmen

Table 13:  Top Ten Life Objectives of 1995 Freshmen

Table 14:  Political Orientation of 1995 Freshmen

Table 15:  Stances on Social and Political Issues

Table 16:  Changes in Stances on Social and Political Issues




LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1:  Changes in Reasons for Attending College

Figure 2:  Changes in Academic Reputation as a Reason to Attend Umass

Figure 3:  Educational Resources

Figure 4:  Grants and Scholarships

Figure 5:  Loans 

Figure 6:  Probable Majors 

Figure 7:  Changes in Career Preferences 

Figure 8:  Students' Degree Expectations 

Figure 9:  Changes in Degree Expectations

Figure 10:  Changes in Smoking and Drinking Habits

Figure 11:  Expected Satisfaction with college 

Figure 12:  Academic Expectations of 1995 Freshmen 

Figure 13:  Being well off financially 

Figure 14:  Developing a philosophy of life

Figure 15:  Promoting racial understanding

Figure 16:  Keeping up to date with politics 

Figure 17:  Political Orientation 

Figure 18:  Changes in support for legalizing marijuana & abilishing
            death penalty 

Figure 19:  The death penalty should be abolished 

Figure 20:  It is important to have laws prohibiting homosexual
            relationships

Figure 21:  The activities of married women are best confined to the
            home and family


PREFACE

Normative data on the characteristics of freshmen entering American colleges and universities are useful for persons engaged in policy analysis, institutional planning and administration, educational research, guidance and counseling, as well as for the general community of students and parents. The annual survey of entering freshmen conducted by the UCLA's Higher Education Research Institute and partially sponsored by the American Council on Education (ACE) provides such information. This survey is part of the Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP), the nation's largest and longest national, longitudinal empirical study of the American higher education system. National results from this study are reported in The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 1995.

The CIRP survey provides information about incoming students' backgrounds, academic and career expectations, personal goals, and opinions on a wide range of political and social issues. The 1995 national study is based on responses from 240,082 freshmen entering 473 two-year and four-year institutions. The normative scores are stratified according to type of institution and admissions profile in order to facilitate comparison.

The University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass) has participated in the CIRP survey since its inception in 1966 (UMass did not participate in 1976 and 1978). Since 1975, the Student Affairs Research, Information and Systems Office (SARIS) has produced a report on the responses of UMass students and students in comparison schools. In 1995, 3,532 of the 3,843 entering UMass freshmen who participated in the New Students Program also participated in the CIRP survey by completing the 30 minute questionnaire during the summer. The high response rate (91.9%) ensures that the scores for the University accurately represent the entire entering freshman class.

The report summarizes the 1995 responses of entering UMass students and students in comparison schools. This year the comparison schools were medium-select public universities. Medium-select is defined as an institution having an average composite SAT score (V & Q) of between 1000 and 1100 for the entering class. Until 1995, UMass Amherst data were compared to high-select public universities, where the average SAT scores for entering students are over 1100.

OVERVIEW OF REPORT PRESENTATION

The 1995 CIRP survey contains items covering a broad range of subjects. This report organizes these items into eight sections: (1) freshmen profile, (2) academic preparation and expectations, (3) decision to attend college, (4) financing college education, (5) probable major and intended career, (6) lifestyle and expectations, (7) life objectives, and (8) social and political attitudes. Table 1 provides a detailed list of the items discussed in each section. A complete copy of the 1995 CIRP questionnaire is found in Appendix B.

The results for the 1995 University of Massachusetts entering class are included in every section. These results are compared with the 1995 normative scores of "medium-select" institutions, and comparisons are made between the responses of women and men where appropriate. Several analyses are provided highlighting differences between males and females. In several sections, the responses of the 1995 incoming freshmen are compared with the responses of UMass freshmen from previous years. These comparisons are made in cases where interesting or informative trends are evident.

The Appendices at the end of this report consist of the following: a list of the comparison schools (Appendix A), the 1995 CIRP questionnaire (Appendix B), comparative data tables of results from 1986 to 1995 for UMass and the comparison schools on selected items (Appendix C) and an Item-by-Item summary of the 1995 CIRP results for UMass and the comparison group of "medium-select" institutions (Appendix D).

TABLE 1. OVERVIEW OF ACE/CIRP SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

                                                             Item Number
Freshman Profile:
     age . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
     racial background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
     religious preference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
     sex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
     U.S. citizen status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
     year graduated from high school . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     estimated parental income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26
     parents' education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
     parents' occupation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29
     parents' religion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
     parents' marital status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18

Academic Preparation:
     average grade in high school . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
     self evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24

Decision to Attend College:
     reasons for attending college . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
     reasons for attending this particular college . . . . . . . .34
     overall choice of this college . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
     number of college applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Financing College Education:
     expected sources of income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Probable Major and Intended Career:
     probable major . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
     degree expectations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
     career preference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29

Freshman Lifestyle and Expectations:
     interests and activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
     living arrangements while at school . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
     miles college is away from home . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
     expectations about college . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

Student Values and Attitudes:
     life objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36
     political view . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
     current issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
                                                                                                                            

Sex and Gender Issues:
     opinions about abortion laws, acceptance of casual sex,
              role of married women,and a man's right to sex . . .30
     likelihood of marriage while in college . . . . . . . . . . .37

SECTION 1. FRESHMEN PROFILE

Family

Table 2 presents the family characteristics of University of Massachusetts freshmen. Most parents live together, although the percentage of parents divorced or separated is slightly greater at the University of Massachusetts than at comparison schools. The vast majority (90.2%) of the freshmen estimate their combined family income to be greater than $19,999, with the median estimate between $50,000 and $59,999. Almost half of freshmen (49.5%) come from families with incomes of $60,000 or more. The father typically is employed as a businessman, engineer or skilled worker, while the top three positions for the mother are educaton, businesswoman, and nurse. Most parents have at least some college education, with fathers being much more likely to have received a graduate degree as mothers (24.8% and 16.5% respectively).

Almost half (47.2%) of the freshmen list their fathers' religion as Roman Catholic, and almost half (48.4%) say their mothers adhere to this religion. University of Massachusetts freshmen differ from the comparison group on religious background, with only about one-third (32.7% and 34.1% for fathers and mothers, respectively) of the comparison group freshmen from Roman Catholic families.

TABLE 2. FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS OF 1995 FRESHMEN

                                        UMass %     Comparison Group % 
Parents' Marital Status:
     Living with each other                69.9             75.6
     Divorced or separated                 25.4             21.2
     One or both deceased                   4.7              3.2

Parents' Occupation (top three)
Father:
     Businessman                           31.9             30.2
     Engineer                               8.8              8.8
     Skilled Worker                         8.2              7.3
Mother: 
     Education (elementary & secondary)    15.8             16.7
     Businesswoman                         14.0             13.7
     Nurse                                 10.3              9.4

Parental Income:
     Less than $6,000                       2.1              1.5
     $6,000 to $9,999                       1.9              1.3
     $10,000 to $14,999                     2.7              2.3
     $15,000 to $19,999                     3.1              3.0
     $20,000 to $24,999                     4.0              4.3
     $25,000 to $29,999                     4.5              5.4
     $30,000 to $39,999                     9.6             10.4
     $40,000 to $49,999                    10.6             12.0
     $50,000 to $59,999                    11.9             13.2
     $60,000 to $74,999                    15.0             15.5
     $75,000 to $99,999                    15.1             13.2
     $100,000 to $149,999                  12.1             10.4
     $150,999 to $199,999                   4.2              3.6
     $200,000 or more                       3.1              3.9

                                    UMass %          Comparison Group % 
                                Father     Mother     Father     Mother 
Parents' Education:
     Grammar school or less       3.5       3.0           1.9     1.6
     Some high school             3.8       3.0           2.8     2.1
     High school graduate        16.9      21.7          19.4    24.0
     Post-secondary other
       than college               4.4       6.7           5.5     7.4
     Some college                12.4      14.7          15.3    17.8
     College degree              31.1      30.6          31.0    30.4
     Some graduate school         3.1       3.7           3.0     3.3
     Graduate degree             24.8      16.5          21.1    13.4

Parents' Religion
     Protestant                  21.9      24.5          51.7    54.0
     Roman Catholic              47.2      48.4          32.7    34.1
     Jewish                      11.5      11.4           2.8     2.6
     Other                        3.1       3.2           2.0     2.2
     None                        12.6       9.1           8.9     5.4

Students

Students at The University of Massachusetts in 1995 are similar in background to students in the comparison group in most respects (Table 3). Entering students typically are 18 years of age and are predominantly white. Compared to other public "medium-select" schools, there is a larger percentage of White/Caucasians and a smaller percentage of Asian-Americans at the University of Massachusetts. Almost all freshmen at the University and at the comparison schools are United States citizens. A noticeable difference between the two groups of freshmen is that the University has proportionately more Jews and Catholics and fewer Protestants than the comparison group.

TABLE 3. INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF 1995 FRESHMEN

                            UMass            Comparison
                              %                Group %
Sex:          
     Male                    49.2               48.1
     Female                  50.8               51.9

Age:
     16 or younger            0.0                0.0
     17                       2.4                1.8
     18                      79.1               70.2
     19                      16.1               26.4
     20                       1.6                0.9
     21 or older              0.7                0.6

Year Graduated High School:
     1995                    97.7               98.0
     1994                     1.7                1.2
     1993                     0.3                0.3
     1992 or earlier          0.3                0.5
     High School Equivalent   0.1                0.1


U.S. Citizen: (yes)          94.4               97.8

Racial Background:
     White/Caucasian         84.6               88.5
     African-American/Black   4.0                5.4
     Native American          1.3                1.5
     Asian-American/Asian     6.8                4.2
     Mexican-American/Chicano 0.4                0.9
     Puerto Rican             2.3                0.5
     Other Latino             2.4                1.1
     Other                    3.3                1.2

Religious Preference:
     Protestant              18.0               48.0
     Catholic                41.6               30.6
     Jewish                   9.9                2.2
     Other                    4.2                2.7
     None                    23.8               15.0

SECTION 2. ACADEMIC PREPARATION AND EXPECTATIONS

High School Achievement

Academic characteristics of entering freshmen are summarized in Table 4. Freshmen at the University of Massachusetts report lower average high school grades than freshmen at comparison schools. Differences exist between men and women, with women reporting higher grades in high school than men.

TABLE 4. HIGH SCHOOL GRADES OF 1995 FRESHMEN

Average Grade in High School
                                   UMass % and (Comparison Group %)
                              Men             Women            Total
A- or better              11.0  (34.8)     18.6  (43.7)     14.9  (39.5)
B- to B+                  74.5  (58.6)     75.1  (53.6)     74.9  (56.0)
C or C+                   14.4  ( 6.5)      6.3  ( 2.8)     10.2  ( 4.6)
D                          0.1  ( 0.1)      0.0  ( 0.0)      0.0  ( 0.1)
                                                                                                                       

Self-Evaluation

Table 5 provides results on how freshmen rate themselves as compared to the average person their age. The results indicate the percentage of students who rate themselves "above average."

TABLE 5. SELF-RATING OF 1995 FRESHMEN

Rating Themselves Above Average Compared to Peers:
                                      UMass % and (Comparison Group %)
                                  Men          Women          Total
Understanding of others       66.9  (64.0)   79.2  (77.0)   73.2  (70.8)
Cooperativeness               69.1  (70.0)   74.3  (76.7)   71.7  (73.5)
Drive to achieve              57.7  (70.3)   62.6  (73.4)   60.2  (71.9)
Academic ability              67.1  (78.3)   60.3  (72.4)   63.7  (75.2)
Creativity                    60.8  (59.8)   51.2  (49.8)   55.9  (54.6)
Physical health               62.7  (67.1)   46.7  (50.2)   54.5  (58.3)
Emotional health              56.7  (65.2)   47.0  (55.5)   51.8  (60.2)
Leadership ability            58.4  (62.5)   51.5  (59.5)   54.9  (61.0)
Competitiveness               63.0  (72.0)   39.1  (50.8)   50.9  (61.0)
Intellectual self-confidence  58.5  (68.9)   41.6  (55.9)   49.9  (62.2)
Social self-confidence        48.5  (52.6)   41.8  (49.3)   45.1  (50.9)
Writing ability               39.1  (43.3)   41.6  (49.2)   40.4  (46.4)
Popularity                    46.4  (46.6)   32.6  (38.0)   39.4  (42.2)
Physical appearance           46.6  (48.0)   35.0  (38.5)   40.7  (43.1)
Stubborness                   38.2  (40.6)   44.0  (47.7)   41.1  (44.3)
Mathematical ability          51.6  (61.6)   34.1  (41.9)   42.7  (51.4)
Public speaking abiltiy       29.6  (35.2)   29.0  (35.8)   29.3  (35.5)
Artistic ability              28.5  (29.5)   28.6  (27.2)   28.6  (28.3)
Cynicism                      24.8  (27.4)   17.7  (16.6)   21.3  (21.8)

Academic Expectations

The CIRP survey asked entering freshmen about their academic expectations. Table 6 summarizes their responses. Most freshmen at the University of Massachusetts are confident that they will get a Bachelor's degree, but a much smaller proportion expects to earn at least a "B" average. Almost half of the women (45.9%) and 39.3 percent of the men predict that they will be satisfied with college. Only 13.6 percent of the freshmen say the chances are very good that they will graduate with honors, while 7.1 percent think they have a very good chance of being elected to an honor society. Almost one-fifth estimate the chances are very good that they will change their major field or career choice. Very few students expect to fail one or more courses or to drop out of college. Only 4.7 percent say there is a very good chance that they will need extra time to get a degree.

TABLE 6. ACADEMIC EXPECTATIONS OF 1995 FRESHMEN

Chances are Very Good that they will: 
                                     UMass % and (Comparison Group %)
                                   Men           Women        Total
Get a Bachelor's Degree         74.1 (74.6)   78.9 (78.1)   76.6 (76.4)
Be satisfied with college       39.3 (44.1)   45.9 (52.0)   42.7 (48.2)
Make at least a B average       46.8 (51.3)   49.0 (52.6)   47.9 (51.9)
Change major field              16.7 (13.8)   18.0 (17.1)   17.4 (15.5)
Change career choice            15.3 (12.9)   18.6 (16.8)   17.0 (14.9)
Graduate with honors            13.6 (17.3)   13.5 (17.9)   13.6 (17.6)
Be elected to an honor society   6.4  (8.4)    7.7 (10.4)    7.1  (9.4)
Need extra time to get degree    5.1  (8.4)    4.3  (9.2)    4.7  (8.8)
Transfer to another college      5.5  (4.6)    5.6  (5.7)    5.5  (5.2)
Fail one or more courses         1.4  (1.0)    0.6  (0.6)    1.0  (0.8)
Drop out temporarily             0.6  (0.6)    0.8  (0.6)    0.7  (0.6)
Drop out permanently             0.5  (0.4)    0.5  (0.3)    0.5  (0.4)

SECTION 3. DECISION TO ATTEND COLLEGE

Reasons for Attending College

Students entering the University of Massachusetts cite a variety of reasons for attending college (Table 7). The majority say they decided to go to college to "learn more about things," "get a better job," "make more money," and "gain a general education." While men are more likely than women to agree that attending college is important to "make more money," women are more likely to agree that "learning more about things," "gaining a general education," "improving reading and study skills," and "becoming a more cultured person," are very important reasons in their decision to attend college.

TABLE 7. REASONS FOR ATTENDING COLLEGE IN 1995

Reasons Cited as Very Important in Deciding to Go to College: 
                                       UMass % and (Comparison Group %)
                                      Men             Women            Total 
Learn more about things           73.7  (72.6)     82.9  (81.0)     78.4  (77.0)
Get a better job                  71.6  (76.6)     70.8  (77.6)     71.2  (77.1)
Make more money                   69.8  (75.5)     61.5  (70.2)     65.6  (72.8)
Gain a general education          59.3  (55.7)     71.1  (69.8)     65.3  (63.0)
Become a more cultured person     37.9  (32.9)     52.0  (49.5)     45.1  (41.5)
Improve reading/study skills      35.6  (33.0)     42.8  (43.5)     39.3  (38.5)
Parents wanted me to go           27.2  (27.5)     26.0  (31.4)     26.6  (29.5)
Get away from home                23.8  (21.3)     29.4  (25.4)     26.6  (23.5)
Role model/mentor encouraged me    8.1  (11.1)      8.4  (12.2)      8.2  (11.7)
Could not find a job               3.3   (4.4)      5.0   (5.6)      4.2   (5.0)
Nothing better to do               3.5   (3.8)      2.4   (2.2)      2.9   (3.0)

Trends over the past decade reveal an increase in the proportion of students citing "parents wanted me to go" and "to get away from home" as reasons for attending college (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1. CHANGES IN REASONS FOR ATTENDING COLLEGE

Reasons for Selecting the University of Massachusetts

Entering freshmen are most likely to cite "has a good academic reputation" as a very important reason for selecting the University of Massachusetts (Table 8). Compared to the medium-select universitites, academic reputation is a less significant factor influencing students' decision to attend the University (Figure 2). Other factors including low tuition and social reputation are mentioned frequently by University of Massachusetts' students as very important reasons for selecting this institution. Several differences between men and women are noted in Table 8.

TABLE 8. THE DECISION TO ATTEND THIS PARTICULAR COLLEGE IN 1995

Reasons Cited as Very Important In Selecting Umass:
                                        UMass % and (Comparison Group %)
                                       Men           Women          Total
Has a good academic reputation     39.7  (52.9)   51.0  (62.4)   45.5  (57.8)
Has low tuition                    38.0  (22.8)   45.7  (27.9)   41.9  (25.5)
Graduates get good jobs            34.8  (43.9)   45.5  (49.8)   40.3  (46.9)
Has a good social reputation       38.1  (28.7)   41.5  (32.0)   39.8  (30.4)
Offered financial assistance       22.1  (19.5)   32.2  (26.1)   27.3  (22.9)
Size of college                    20.3  (19.2)   28.9  (27.6)   24.7  (23.5)
Graduates go to top grad schools   17.6  (19.6)   29.5  (29.9)   23.7  (24.9)
Offers special programs            16.5  (14.6)   24.8  (23.6)   20.7  (19.3)
Wanted to live near home            8.0   (9.3)   11.4  (14.0)    9.7  (11.7)
Friend suggested attending          6.4   (8.1)    6.5   (8.1)    6.4   (8.1)
Rankings in national magazines      5.6   (8.8)    6.7   (9.7)    6.1   (9.2)
Advice of guidance counselor        5.5   (4.4)    5.3   (4.8)    5.4   (4.6)
Relatives wanted me to come         4.2   (4.7)    4.8   (6.1)    4.5   (5.4)
Recruited by athletic department    5.3   (3.6)    2.3   (2.5)    3.8   (3.0)
Not accepted anywhere else          3.3   (1.9)    2.5   (1.2)    2.9   (1.5)
Advice of teacher                   2.7   (2.3)    1.9   (2.6)    2.3   (2.5)
Recruited by college rep            1.7   (2.1)    1.3   (1.8)    1.5   (2.0)
Pvt. college counselor advised me   1.2   (0.9)    1.3   (0.9)    1.3   (0.9)
Religious affil/orientation         0.8   (0.8)    1.1   (1.1)    1.0   (0.9)

FIGURE 2. CHANGES IN ACADEMIC REPUTATION AS A REASON TO ATTEND UMASS

Number of Applications and Acceptances

Almost 91 percent of the freshmen applied to at least one other college. Almost one-third (32.2%) of the incoming freshmen applied to five or more colleges. Sixty percent of the entering freshmen say that the University of Massachusetts was their first choice and 27.2 percent listed it as their second choice.

SECTION 4. FINANCING COLLEGE EDUCATION

Student financial resources include family contributions, grants, scholarships, and educational loans. The percentage of students receiving aid from each of these sources is shown in Figures 3 through 5.

FIGURE 3. EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES

Most students receive at least some financial support from their parents, and 69.3 percent use income from summer work to supplement other resources (Figure 3). Nearly two-fifths of the freshmen intend to work part-time on-campus to help pay for college expenses. Students at the University of Massachusetts are more likely to plan to work while in college and to rely upon their savings from summer work than students at comparison schools.

FIGURE 4. GRANTS AND SCHOLARSHIPS

Fifteen percent of University of Massachusetts freshmen rely on state scholarships or grants for financial assistance (Figure 4). Students at the University of Massachusetts are more likely to receive assistance from work-study than students at comparison schools.

FIGURE 5. LOANS

Twenty-six percent of the entering freshmen at the University of Massachusetts received a Federal Guaranteed Student Loan (FGSL), which is down ten percent from last year.

Changes in financial resources of students since 1986 shows increasing use of all grants and scholarships except State grants, private grants, and FGSL loans (Table 9).

TABLE 9. CHANGES IN FINANCIAL RESOURCES

                              % Receiving Some Aid
                         UMass % and (Comparison Group %)

                                                        % Change
                          1986              1995        for UMass
Family Resources:

     Parental Aid    86.3   (86.1)     87.1   (83.5)     + 0.8

Grants and Scholarships:

     PELL             9.1   (11.6)     14.1   (15.8)     + 5.0
     SEOG             4.6    (4.1)      6.7    (4.8)     + 2.1
     State grant     18.8   (18.2)     15.1   (17.6)     - 3.7
     Private grant   11.9   (10.4)     11.4   (10.1)     - 0.5

Loans:

     FGSL            26.2   (19.8)     25.8   (25.5)     - 0.4
     Other 
      college loans   6.2    (4.1)     16.0   (12.2)     + 9.8
     Other loans      4.8    (3.6)      8.6    (7.9)     + 3.8

SECTION 5. PROBABLE MAJOR AND INTENDED CAREER

Probable Major

Table 10 lists the proportions of entering freshmen intending to major in various fields. Students from both the University of Massachusetts and comparison schools indicate strongest interest in business, arts and humanities, social science, professional, biological science, and engineering majors. However, compared to other public medium-select schools, a larger proportion of students at the University of Massachusetts intend to major in business, social science and arts & humanities. As Figure 6 shows, the most significant gender differences among UMass freshmen are that 12.5 percent of the men compared to 2.5 percent of the women indicate engineering as their probable major, and 16.8 percent of the women compared to 7.5 percent of the men intend to major in the social sciences.

TABLE 10. PROBABLE MAJOR OF 1995 FRESHMEN

                             UMass % and (Comparison Group %)
                        Men            Women           Total
Business            19.8  (14.5)    12.1  (12.2)    15.7  (13.3)
Social Science       7.5   (4.5)    16.8  (10.6)    12.3   (7.7)
Arts & Humanities   12.2   (8.4)    14.5  (11.8)    13.2  (10.2)
Professional         7.5  (12.8)    15.8  (24.5)    11.7  (19.0)
Biological Science  10.4   (7.2)    11.3   (9.2)    10.8   (8.2)
Engineering         12.5  (25.9)     2.5   (5.6)     7.3  (15.3)
Education            2.5   (2.5)     7.2   (7.9)     4.8   (5.3)
Communications       4.2   (0.9)     3.5   (1.6)     3.8   (1.3)
Physical Science     3.5   (3.3)     2.2   (2.2)     2.8   (2.7)
Computer Science     4.6   (3.8)     0.6   (0.7)     2.5   (2.2)
Data Processing      1.1   (1.5)     0.1   (0.2)     0.6   (0.8)
Other Technical      0.5   (0.4)     0.0   (0.3)     0.2   (0.3)
Other fields         4.5   (6.9)     2.6   (3.9)     3.6   (5.5)
Undecided            9.4   (7.0)    11.0   (9.2)    10.2   (8.2)

FIGURE 6: PROBABLE MAJORS OF MALES AND FEMALES

Career Preference

Freshmen at the University of Massachusetts are diverse in their career interests, but cite occupations in business (either buyer, salesman, owner, accountant or business executive) and engineering more often than other careers. Other occupations frequently mentioned include lawyer or judge (4.4%), physician (5.6%), educator (6.4%), journalist (3.6%), and scientific researcher (2.7%). About 19 percent said "undecided."

The most significant changes in career preferences over time have been in business, engineering, education and computer science occupations (Figure 7). Interest in business careers has been declining since 1986 until this year when it rose over three percentage points to 15.7% approximately the same position as in 1990. The percentage of students interested in careers in engineering declined from 1984 to 1989 and has since remained almost unchanged until last year when it declined to 7.2 percent, this year it is 7.3 percent. Interest in computer science and education has remained fairly steady in recent years.

FIGURE 7. CHANGES IN CAREER PREFERENCES

Degree Expectations

Figure 8 compares the percentages of UMass freshmen planning postgraduate education to the comparison group. Three-quarters of the students at the University of Massachusetts say they plan to obtain a graduate degree. Students planning graduate work are more likely to say they will pursue a Master's or Doctoral degree and less likely to say they anticipate obtaining a medical, law or other degree. Freshmen in the comparison schools are slightly more likely than University of Massachusetts freshmen to say they will pursue medical or Doctorate degrees.

FIGURE 8. STUDENTS' DEGREE EXPECTATIONS

Figure 9 shows that the percentage of students planning post graduate education has remained relatively stable over the past decade.

FIGURE 9. CHANGES IN DEGREE EXPECTATIONS

SECTION 6. FRESHMEN LIFESTYLE AND EXPECTATIONS

Activities and Interests

The CIRP survey asks entering freshmen to estimate the number of hours per week they participated in a variety of social and academic activities during the previous year. Activities in which students frequently participated are listed in Table 11. The vast majority said they spent at least six hours per week socializing.

TABLE 11. 1995 FRESHMEN ACTIVITIES

Activities Students Participated in at Least Six Hours Per Week: 
                                          UMass % and (Comparison Group %)
                                 Men             Women            Total 
Socializing with friends     86.3  (81.7)     83.5  (81.4)     84.9  (81.6)
Working (for pay)            67.1  (64.8)     74.3  (67.6)     70.8  (66.3)
Exercising or sports         60.5  (62.0)     46.5  (47.9)     53.3  (54.6)
Partying                     43.0  (34.7)     37.2  (32.0)     40.1  (33.5)
Studying or doing homework   31.7  (31.3)     43.6  (45.3)     37.8  (38.6)
Watching TV                  32.5  (33.2)     21.8  (21.4)     27.1  (27.1)
Student clubs or groups       9.4  (10.3)     13.9  (18.5)     11.7  (14.6)
Reading for pleasure          8.8  ( 9.7)     11.5  (11.2)     10.2  (10.5)
Household/child care duties   4.5  ( 4.8)     10.4  (10.3)      7.5  ( 7.7)
Volunteer work                5.0  ( 5.1)      8.6  ( 7.9)      6.9  ( 6.6)
Talking with teachers         3.7  ( 3.0)      3.3  ( 4.5)      3.5  ( 3.8)
   outside of class
Playing video games           5.4  ( 6.6)      0.5  ( 0.5)      2.0  ( 3.3)
   

As noted in Table 11, a larger proportion of women than men at the University of Massachusetts spent time studying, participating in clubs or groups, and working for pay. A greater proportion of men than women indicate spending time exercising and watching television.

Over the past ten years the percentage of students saying they drank beer has decreased substantially while the proportion of students who smoke cigarettes has remained close to 10 percent (Figure 10). In 1986, 79 percent said they drank beer and 10.9 percent said they smoked cigarettes. In 1995, just 66.5 percent said they drank beer and 15.2 percent said they smoked during the previous year.

FIGURE 10. CHANGES IN SMOKING AND DRINKING HABITS

Students have varying expectations about their college life, as indicated in Table 12. Almost one-half of freshmen at the University of Massachusetts think their chances are very good that they will get a job to pay for college expenses. A significantly greater proportion of women than men anticipate working to pay for college and participating in volunteer work or community service. Freshmen also express some interest in competitive sports, with about ten percent estimating the chances as very good that they will play varsity athletics. A smaller proportion of University of Massachusetts freshmen intend to join a fraternity or sorority than at comparison schools. ( Only about 5 percent of the student body, actually become members of Greek organizations.) Only a tiny proportion of students expect to marry while in college.

TABLE 12. NON-ACADEMIC EXPECTATIONS OF 1995 FRESHMEN

Chances are Very Good that they will: 
                                            UMass % and (Comparison Group %)
                                        Men              Women            Total
Get job to pay college expenses     38.3  (37.3)      49.6  (46.0)     44.1  (41.8)
Volunteer work, community service    9.6  (9.6)       24.8  (23.4)     17.4  (16.7)
Join fraternity or sorority         10.4  (15.4)      14.5  (22.7)     12.5  (19.2)
Play varsity athletics              13.8  (12.3)       9.8  ( 8.4)     11.7  (10.3)
Participate in student protests      6.6  ( 3.8)      10.1  ( 6.1)      8.4  ( 5.0)
Marry while in college               1.9  ( 3.5)       2.1  ( 6.0)      2.0  ( 4.8)
Be elected to student office         1.2  ( 2.6)       2.5  ( 2.9)      1.8  ( 2.7)
Work full time while in college      1.3  ( 2.2)       2.6  ( 3.1)      2.0  ( 2.7)

Expected Satisfaction

Figure 11 shows that 42.7 percent of the entering freshmen at the University of Massachusetts say their chances are very good that they will be satisfied with college, compared to 48.2 percent of the freshmen at comparison schools. Women in both groups tend to be more optimistic about their college experience than men. Forty-six percent of the women at the University of Massachusetts say their chances of being satisfied are very good compared to 39 percent of the men. Few students say they probably will transfer to another college (5.5%). As shown in Figure 12, students' expectations of transferring and of being satisfied with college have changed little over the past decade.

FIGURE 11. EXPECTED SATISFACTION WITH COLLEGE (% saying their chances are very good)

FIGURE 12. ACADEMIC EXPECTATIONS (% saying chances are very good they will ...)

SECTION 7. LIFE OBJECTIVES

Table 13 lists life objectives considered important to University of Massachusetts freshmen. Majorities of entering freshmen say "being very well off financially," " raising a family," and "becoming an authority in my field" are important life objectives for them. Significantly greater proportions of women than men place importance in "value" objectives such as "helping others in difficulty," "promoting racial understanding," and "influencing social values."

TABLE 13. TOP TEN LIFE OBJECTIVES OF 1995 FRESHMEN

Top Ten Objectives Considered to be Essential or Very Important:
                                              UMass % and (Comparison Group %)
                                            Men            Women          Total 
Being very well off financially         74.9  (76.7)    72.4  (71.1)    73.6  (73.8)
Raising a family                        71.1  (69.4)    68.3  (70.7)    69.7  (70.1)
Becoming an authority in my field       67.2  (66.5)    64.2  (67.1)    65.7  (66.8)
Help others in difficulty               49.5  (44.6)    68.9  (66.1)    59.4  (55.7)
Obtaining recognition from colleagues   54.7  (56.3)    57.6  (59.3)    56.2  (57.8)
Developing a philosophy of life         48.9  (40.0)    50.9  (42.8)    49.9  (41.4)
Helping promote racial understanding    33.9  (24.5)    43.2  (33.9)    38.6  (29.4)
Influencing social values               32.8  (28.9)    43.6  (41.4)    38.3  (35.4)
Keeping up to date with politics        33.8  (32.8)    31.9  (29.2)    32.8  (30.9)
Being successful in own business        43.8  (42.6)    32.6  (32.5)    38.1  (37.4)

Trends of Life Objectives

Important changes in UMass students' life objectives over the past decade are as follows: the proportion of students citing "be successful in my own business" as a very important life objective declined from 47.6% in 1986 to 38.1% in 1995; the proportion of students citing "helping to promote racial understanding" as a very important objective increased from 32.5% in 1986 to 47.9% in 1992 and decreased to 38.6% in 1995; and the proportion of students citing "influence social values" as a very important objective increased from 30.8% in 1986 to 44.4% in 1994 and decreased to 38.3% in 1995.

As illustrated in Figure 13, the proportion of students' rating "being very well off financially" as very important has fluctuated dramatically over the past twenty-five years, both at UMass and at comparison schools . From 1962 to 1972, the proportion of UMass students rating this as a very important life objective dropped, hitting an all-time low of 30.3%. In 1973, this proportion increased sharply to 47.5%, decreased slightly the following year, and remained on an upward trend until 1984, reaching an all-time high of 74.7%. Over the past decade, the proportion of freshmen rating "being very well off financially" as very important has remained realtively stable.

Figure 13: Being very well off financially (% saying this objective is essential or very important)

As illustrated in Figure 14, the proportion of students rating "developing a meaningful philosophy of life" as a very important life objective has dropped considerably over the past twenty-five years, both at UMass and at comparison schools. Between 1968 and 1987, there was a nearly continuous downward trend at UMass, from a high-point of 87.3% to a low-point of 41.4%. In 1988, the proportion increased sharply, only to decrease the following year. The proportion of UMass students rating "developing a meaningful philosophy of life" as a very important life objective has increased only slightly over the past five yars. The trend over time at UMass essentially mirrors that at the comparison schools.

Figure 14: Developing a meaningful philosophy of life (% saying objective is essential or very important)

As illustrated in Figure 15, the proportion of students rating "promoting racial understanding" as an essential or very important life objective has fluctuated since 1977, but has remained on an upward trajectory overall until this year when it declined six percentage points to 39 percent. At UMass, this proportion reached an all-time high in of 47.9% in 1992. Once again, the trend over time at UMass essentially mirrors that of the comparison group.

Figure 15: Promoting racial understanding (% saying objective is essential or very important)

The proportion of students rating "keeping up with politics" as an essential or very important life objective has fluctuated substantially since 1966, but has diminished overall, both at UMass and at comparison schools. At UMass, the proportion reached an all-time high of 62.8% in 1970 and this year it has reached an all time low of 33%.

Figure 16: Keeping up to date with politics (% saying objective is essential or very important)

SECTION 8: SOCIAL AND POLITICAL ATTITUDES

Table 14 shows political orientations of freshmen at the University of Massachusetts and at comparison schools. Over half of the students describe their political orientation as "middle-of-the-road," while more than three times as many students consider themselves "liberal or far left" than "conservative or far right." The comparison group represents a more equal distribution of students between the conservative and liberal orientations. The disparity in the proportions of liberals and conservatives is greater among women than among men; 39.5 percent of women freshmen consider themselves liberal or far left while only 8.1 percent say their political orientation is "conservative or far right" (see Figure 17).

TABLE 14. POLITICAL ORIENTATION OF 1995 FRESHMEN

                                   UMass % and (Comparison Group %)
                                Men            Women           Total
Liberal or far left         29.7  (21.7)    39.5  (29.4)    34.7  (25.6)
Middle of the Road          52.5  (48.0)    52.4  (53.6)    52.4  (50.9)
Conservative or far right   17.8  (30.2)     8.1  (17.1)    12.9  (23.5)

FIGURE 17: POLITICAL ORIENTATION OF MALES AND FEMALES

Students' agreement with a variety of statements pertaining to social and political issues is listed in Table 15. As indicated, the responses of women and men differ significantly on all but five items. Generally, larger proportions of women than men have "liberal" views on social issues. Some of the largest disparities in opinion between women and men occur on sex-related issues. Less than one-half of women, but nearly three-quarters of men agree that sex is O.K. if people like each other. Also, while nearly one-quarter of men agree homosexual relations should be prohibited, 7.2 percent of women take this stance.

TABLE 15. STANCES ON SOCIAL AND POLITICAL ISSUES

Agrees Strongly or Somewhat:
                                              UMass % and (Comparison Group %)
                                           Men           Women            Total
Woman "leading him on" does not 
     entitle man to sex                89.8  (87.4)    96.5  (96.2)     93.2  (92.0)
Government should control handguns     84.5  (69.5)    94.9  (90.6)     89.8  (80.4)
Better education & more job oppor.
     would substantially reduce crime  88.9  (87.2)    89.6   (88.9)    89.3  (88.1)
Government not controlling pollution   85.1   (78.9)   89.7   (88.0)    87.4  (83.7)
National health care plan needed       78.7  (61.4)    85.3   (72.5)    82.0  (67.2)
Abortion should be legal               75.5  (61.5)    81.4   (65.3)    78.5  (63.5)
Wealthy should pay more taxes          70.3  (66.2)    70.8   (69.7)    70.6  (68.0)
Too much concern for rights of 
     criminals                         72.7  (77.2)    71.0   (74.8)    71.8  (76.0)
Employers can require drug tests       60.1  (75.1)    64.5   (78.9)    62.3  (77.0)
Prohibit racist/sexist speech          58.9  (53.7)    68.3   (62.2)    63.7  (58.1)
Sex is okay if people like each other  71.7  (57.5)    45.5   (34.6)    58.4  (45.7)
Marijuana should be legalized          55.4  (36.5)    49.4   (34.1)    52.3  (35.2)
Affirm. action in college admissions 
     should be abolished               56.5  (61.7)    46.3   (46.7)    51.3  (54.0)
People should not obey laws which 
     violate their personal values     45.8  (39.0)    38.4   (30.9)    42.0  (34.8)
Children of undocumented 
     immigrants should be 
     denied access to pub edu          41.3  (47.1)    26.1   (30.1)    33.6  (38.3)
Individual can do little to 
     change society                    36.6  (34.9)    26.2   (26.3)    31.3  (30.4)
Raise taxes to reduce deficit          29.9  (33.6)    25.1   (29.3)    27.5  (31.4)
Abolish death penalty                  21.6  (15.4)    29.2   (20.9)    25.5  (18.3)
Married women best at home             23.0  (25.7)    14.1   (14.5)    18.5  (19.9)
Prohibit homosexual relations          23.4  (37.6)     7.2   (15.3)    15.1  (26.1)
Racial discrimination no longer
     problem                           16.5  (22.9)    11.2   (13.5)    13.8  (18.1)


Note:  The phrases above are abbreviations of the actual survey items.  See Appendix B.

Table 16 illustrates that larger porportions of the 1995 freshmen class take a"liberal" stance on particular social issues than the 1986 freshmen class. One exception to this generalization is that a smaller proportion of 1995 freshmen than 1986 freshmen support abolishing the death penalty.

TABLE 16. CHANGES IN STANCES ON SOCIAL AND POLITICAL ISSUES

(% agreeing strongly or somewhat)
                                         1986                  1995                   % Change
                                  Men   Women  Total    Men   Women  Total     Men     Women     Total
Prohibit homosexual relations    47.9   23.5   35.2    23.4    7.2   15.1     -24.5    -16.3     -20.1
Abolish death penalty            25.8   38.7   32.5    21.6   29.2   25.5      -4.2     -9.5      -7.0
Legalize abortion                72.1   78.0   75.2    75.5   81.4   78.5      +3.4     +3.4      +3.3
National health plan needed      62.4   69.5   66.1    78.7   85.3   82.0     +16.3    +15.8     +15.9
Wealthy should pay more taxes    73.2   71.2   72.2    70.3   70.8   70.6      -2.9     -0.4      -1.6
Marijuana should be legalized    37.7   27.2   32.3    55.4   49.4   52.3     +17.7     +22.2    +20.0

FIGURE 18: CHANGES IN SUPPORT FOR LEGALIZING MARIJUANA AND ABOLISHING DEATH PENALTY

Figure 18 shows that student support for legalizing marijuana declined from 1986 to 1989, but has since increased substantially. Although support for abolishing the death penalty has fluctuated somewhat in the past decade, the overall trend has been downward. Thus, in 1995, a greater proportion of freshmen appear to be supportive of the death penalty than at any time in the past decade.

Trends in Social and Political Attitude

As Figure 19 illustrates, the proportion of students expressing support for abolishing the dealth penalty has diminshed since 1970, both at UMass and the comparison schools. Throughout most of the past twenty-five years, the porportion of UMass students expressing support for abolishing the dealth penalty has been greater than that at the comparison schools.

Figure 19: THE DEATH PENALTY SHOULD BE ABOLISHED
(% agreeing strongly or somewhat)

As illustrated in Figure 20, the proportion of freshmen who agree that homosexual realtions should be prohibited by law remained relatively stable from 1977 to 1987, but diminished considerably from 1988 onward. Support for prohibitive laws has reached an all-time low of 15% at UMass in 1995.

Figure 20: IT IS IMPORTANT TO HAVE LAWS PROHIBITING HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS
(% agreeing strongly or somewhat)

The proportion of UMass freshmen agreeing that "the activities of married women are best confined to the home and family" dropped from 46.2% in 1967 to a near-low of 16.8% in 1975. Since 1975, the proportion has risen slightly to hover around twenty-percent, aside from dropping to 16.5% and 15.9% in 1985 and 1986, respectively. UMass freshmen were consistently more liberal on this issue than freshmen at comparison schools until 1979.

Figure 21: THE ACTIVITIES OF MARRIED WOMEN ARE BEST CONFINED TO THE HOME AND FAMILY
(% agreeing strongly or somewhat)

APPENDICES

Appendix A: List of Comparison Schools

Appendix B: 1995 ACE/CIRP Instrument

Appendix C: Selected Comparative Data Tables, 1986 - 1995

Appendix D: Item-by-Item Summary of the 1995 ACE/CIRP Data


APPENDIX A

The following schools represent public universities in the "medium select" group (average SAT score of between 1000 and 1100). These schools make up the "comparison group" in which UMass has chosen to be represented. In the Item-by-Item Summary in Appendix D, the normative data collected for these schools appear under the heading "Pub Univ-Med select."

Comparison schools used in the calculation of the 1995 normative or comparison data discussed throughout the report. These are the schools which were judged to have representative samples.

               Florida State University
               Iowa State University
               Northern Illinois University
               South Dakota State University
               University of Minnesota
               University of Missouri
               University of North Dakota
               University of Pittsburgh
               University of Vermont
               Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

APPENDIX B:
THE 1995 ACE/CIRP SURVEY INSTRUMENT

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

APPENDIX C:
COMPARATIVE DATA TABLES (1986 - 1995)

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

APPENDIX D:
ITEM-BY-ITEM SUMMARY OF THE 1995 ACE/CIRP DATA

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

Page 9

Page 10

Page 11

Page 12

Page 13

Page 14

Page 15

Page 16

Page 17