|
Undergraduate education efforts backed
by Sarah
R. Buchholz, Chronicle staff
he Faculty Senate endorsed the continuing efforts
of its Ad Hoc Committee on Undergraduate Education, including the
formation of a permanent council, following a presentation on May
9.
The committee
made four broad recommendations: to initiate changes in order to
foster a teaching culture; to investigate curricular and programmatic
resource issues; to address the immediate challenges to high quality
education for undergraduates; and to establish broad, collaborative
governance support structures. The recommendations are designed
to improve advocacy for a "high quality undergraduate education
appropriate to a major research university."
The committee
noted, "In such areas as first-year programs, learning communities,
honors programming, introductory and advanced writing-across-the-curriculum,
community-based coursework, learning resources, and diversity initiatives,
the University can take pride in practices and institutional structures
that result in quality undergraduate educational experiences."
"We have
done a remarkable job and made tremendous strides over the last
decade, given our limited resources," said Mary Deane Sorcinelli,
co-chair of the committee.
Such practices
and structures must be safeguarded against loss during the current
fiscal climate, Sorcinelli told the senate.
Enhancing public
support for undergraduate teaching efforts, enhancing advising and
teaching development, encouraging the pursuit of outside grant sources
to support new initiatives that enhance teaching, increasing attention
to evaluation and assessment, and addressing the deteriorating conditions
of the instructional environment were recommended as ways to foster
the teaching culture.
According to the
report, among the options to be considered in investigating resource
problems are a 4-4 curriculum, more evening classes to free up space,
Monday/Wednesday 75-minute courses, supporting departments that
have heavy service-course burdens, renegotiating expectations within
and between departments with regard to required courses, ways in
which technology can further enhance teacher-student contact, and
a top-level campuswide administrator for undergraduate affairs.
Sorcinelli and Jenny Spencer, the committee's other co-chair, stressed
that the committee was not necessarily recommending any of these
possibilities but recommended investigating them. In addressing
immediate challenges to quality undergraduate teaching, the committee
suggested four actions. The first is to articulate the need for
hiring more tenure-track faculty promptly.
The second is
to "recognize that decreasing the undergraduate population
will not solve the current resource problem and may negatively impact
long-term resources."
The third is to
ensure that program-evaluation standards reflect support of undergraduate
education, including recognition of graduate programs that train
future teachers.
The fourth is
to consider that innovative interdisciplinary teaching and research
require strong discipline-based departments in evaluating programs
and units.
The final recommendation
is to establish a permanent council to advocate for quality undergraduate
education.
By endorsing the
report, the senate signaled its wish that the committee press on
with its work over the summer. Establishment of a permanent council
requires a several-week process in the senate and therefore cannot
be addressed until the fall.
|