|
Writing Center needs funding,
says senate
by Sarah
R. Buchholz, Chronicle staff
he
importance of writing instruction on campus was underscored Oct.
19 as the Faculty Senate adopted a motion that includes a call for
additional funding for the Writing Center with the goal of broadening
its scope "to include additional tutors and faculty support
for writing in courses across the University."
The motion was part of the Annual
Report of the University Writing Committee, which is charged with
recommending policies concerning the operation and administration
of the Writing Center, among other things.
"No, I don't think we're doing
an adequate job now," Marcia Curtis, acting director of the
Writing Program, told the senate. "I think we're doing the
best we can on $10,000 and a quarter of a salary." Curtis said
the center provides 36 contact hours per week of tutoring to serve
the writing needs of the campus's more than 18,000 undergraduates.
Neighboring UConn's Writing Center offers
160 contact hours per week in the fall and spring semesters plus
some summer hours for its fewer than 12,000 undergraduates, according
to its director Karen Cajka. Her center's tutoring budget usually
amounts to 23,000 by the end of the year, she said. The center also
funds four part-time receptionists (an equivalent of 1.5 FTE) and
two half-time directors. The UConn center generally serves freshman
English classes but has recently begun expanding its mission to
provide tutors grounded in a variety of disciplines to better serve
student writers in fields outside of English, Cajka said.
The Writing Lab at the University
of Missouri-Columbia, which enrolls about the same number of undergraduates
as this campus, provides 200 hours per week of in-person tutoring
and 35 hours of online tutoring for freshman English and all other
courses not designated "writing intensive." The lab's
budget is $38,000 plus salaries for two professional staff members
and additional funding from the campus's English department, residence
life, and other sources, according to Elaine Hocks, the lab's director.
Missouri separately funds tutoring
and extensive faculty support for its more than 110 writing-intensive
courses each semester through its Campus Writing Program. This program
provides an additional 90 to 100 contact hours of tutoring per week
for students in these courses. The program's tutoring budget is
about $43,000, according to Jo Ann Vogt, coordinator of student
services and faculty consultant for education and social sciences/humanities
and arts.
The tutoring service receives a little
more than one FTE staff member to support it. The remainder of the
program's five full-time staffers' hours are devoted to faculty
support and administration of the writing-intensive courses.
The senate's Writing Committee report
said that "despite an already bare-bones budget, the Writing
Program was able to make" a required 2 percent budget cut by
raising enrollment ceilings in honor sections of the freshman writing
class, English 112, from 20 to 24 and training undergraduates to
act as peer tutors to fill in for reductions in graduate student
staff.
"[For] several
years ... we have said in our annual reports that we perceived a
crying need for expansion of this critical size of the Writing Center
in order to deal with problems that we see," said Libraries
Humanities bibliographer Jim Kelly, a member of the committee. "More
people need to be served. There needs to be a sufficiently larger
space and larger staff."
"We offer tutoring to the undergraduates
who find us," Curtis said, "but because of our limited
funds, we cannot really advertise that the tutoring center is open.
My understanding is that there are many, many junior-year [writing
seminar] teachers and students, as well as other students who are
not in junior-year [writing] classes but who are taking writing
currently in the curriculum, who are not getting the tutoring they
need, have nowhere to go for it. There is also insufficient money
within our Writing Center to go out in among the teachers in the
junior year and to help them with support, workshops, and simply
to make other information available, so I think that's [what] the
committee is ... asking to remedy in this request."
Lisa Saunders of Economics said that
she has seen "a devastating effect on the morale, not on the
students themselves, but on the faculty who teach the [junior-year
writing] courses" in Social and Behavioral Sciences, as a result
of large class sizes and limited support. Some faculty are refusing
to teach junior writing classes, she said.
Curtis said former Writing Center
director Peter Elbow had estimated that $100,000 would "establish
a really working writing center with a director of the center and
sufficient tutoring money with tutors to support it." She said
$100,000 would allow the director and a staff to provide support
to faculty teaching writing courses, as well as supply sufficient
tutors for existing courses. Curtis said part of Elbow's impetus
to draft that budget had been the possibility that the General Education
Task Force would recommend adding two writing-intensive courses
to the graduation requirements for a bachelor's degree.
The committee's report indicated that
Writing Committee members who attended the March 24 General Education
Task Force explained how writing-intensive courses should work and
argued against adding further writing requirements until a "fully
funded Writing Center able to provide support for both faculty and
students of existing and proposed writing classes" is in place.
"The Writing Program has got
a problem," said senate secretary Ernie May. "I ... support
the motion that this is not an allocation of a certain amount of
money... but that the administration look at what we need to do
to provide adequate funding for the Writing Program."
|