|
Student Affairs appointment spurs questions
about process
by Sarah
R. Buchholz, Chronicle staff
hough the appointment of Javier Cevallos as the
new vice chancellor for Student Affairs and Campus Life was generally
applauded at the Oct. 19 Faculty Senate meeting, some senators raised
questions about the hiring process.
"Without any doubt
about [Cevallos'] qualifications for the office, I was wondering
about the procedure," said Rules Committee chair Roland Chilton
during the question period, "and I may just have fallen behind
in keeping track of the procedures for appointing major administrative
officers, and it certainly makes sense that you would...appoint
a major administrative officer as an acting position without a search,
but is it now the case that we make appointments to those positions
without a search at all?"
"No," Chancellor
David Scott replied. "That's not the normal procedure.
"Occasionally,
and certainly it's something I use very, very rarely, there is a
special opportunity that comes before you that is an extraordinary
opportunity that you can take advantage of in a narrow window of
time, so I did not do a search.
"The times where
I have used appointments without searches for such high-level positions
have always been where I believe I also advance the diversity of
the administration... Javier Cevallos is in fact the only member
of my administration who is an Hispanic American.
"I believe that
it is important symbolically to have Hispanic Americans and diversity
in my administration, so he is symbolically important. He is structurally
important for what he has done already, and he is substantively
important because of the ideas he has demonstrated in the past in
this job and in other jobs. So for all of these reasons, I waived
the procedures. I've only done that on one other occasion during
my eight-year tenure as the chancellor."
Scott also said that
had Cevallos gone to another institution, another year would have
passed before a permanent vice chancellor could be searched for
and put in place. That period under a different interim, plus the
adjustment period for the new permanent hire would have "put
us on hold...for a while" in Student Affairs.
"The chancellor
has made the statement many times, and I agree with it, that reasonable
people can respectfully disagree," said History professor Jack
Tager, who chairs the Program and Budget Council. "I disagree.
"Two points,
and they...come under what I consider to be lack of collegiality.
While Javier, I think, is superb (I think he's great), I think you
did the wrong thing by not following procedure."
Tager also said he
was distressed by a Daily Hampshire Gazette story in which
the chancellor was reported to have said that people on campus wanted
the reallocation pool monies taken from Academic Affairs put into
Research.
"I don't know
who these people are that you refer to in this newspaper. I respectfully
disagree. You made a decision which you believe in and you have
the right to make this decision, but I think you should have spoken
to other people in a collegial manner about how this should be done.
"I don't think
that we had other people involved. My committee, the Program and
Budget Council, was not involved in this decision. As far as I know,
the senate was not involved in this decision.
"I'm not suggesting
that you don't have the right to do this or that it's even a bad
decision because maybe it's the right decision. It's the process
that I take issue with. I think that collegiality means that we
need to communicate and consult, and here are two instances in which
I don't think you've done that."
"One should not
ride roughshod over process," Scott said. In the case of appointing
Cevallos, Scott said he only had a few days to consult and that
he did consult "with a number of groups." He also said
that his decisions about budgetary issues are "the result of
a very long, complicated process about ideas and priorities that
are fed up the line from the vice chancellors. ... In the Provost's
case, they are working with all of the deans, the chairpersons,
and the heads, and the other vice chancellors and deputy chancellors
are working with others.
"There is a process
in the senate for consultation on budget and priorities. I can't
tell you what kind of consultations went on there, but we do have
liaisons to that process. I sift through all of that and try and
cull the right set of decisions to advance the entire institution."
|