|
The Interdisciplinary Seminar on Conflict and Violence is designed to promote interdisciplinary exchanges among faculty and students interested in the topics of conflict, violence, and peace, from a wide range of departments across campus. Each meeting includes a 30-35 minute presentation followed by a half-hour discussion. |
________________________________________
Upcoming Event:
Alain Lempereur |
Empowering Local Leadership for Peace:
Evidence from Post-Conflict Interventions in Burundi and the DR Congo. *
* Sponsored by UMass Psychology of Peace and Violence Program and the Public Education for Peacebuilding Support Initiative of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP).
|
All stages in a post-conflict intervention allow a facilitation team to get the buy-in and direct involvement of local leaders. Evidence will be provided by the work of the Burundi Leadership Training Program and the Initiative for a Cohesive Leadership in the DR Congo, where local leaders were permanently mobilized to drive the process and determine the content from beginning to end: in conflict assessment, convening, orientation, planning and location of activities, as well as in delivery, readjustment of content, communicating of results, monitoring and follow-up.
Mr. Lempereur is The Alan B. Slifka Professor and Director, Graduate Programs in Coexistence and Conflict at the Heller School for Social Policy at Brandeis University and member of the Executive Committee, Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.
As a mediator in conflicts and negotiation expert, he advises international organizations, such as the European Commission and Parliament, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR), and World Health Organization (WHO). Through the Wilson International Center for Scholars, he facilitated reconciliation and leadership programs in Africa, notably, in Burundi (2003-2007) and in the D.R. Congo (2006-2009). He belongs to the UN mediators' network, and also moderated local and global meetings for the International Dialogue on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding (2009-2011) for the OECD. As a negotiation pioneer in Europe and Professor of Negotiation and Mediation at Essec in Paris and Singapore (1995-2011), he established, and developed, an academic institute called Irene – peace in Greek –, which he led as its first director (1995-2008).
Thursday, April 11th, 12:00 till 1:00 PM
Tobin Hall Room 423
Department of Psychology
Refreshments will be served
Open to Everyone
________________________________________
|
Eileen F. Babbitt |
THE PRACTICAL REALITIES OF PEACE WITH JUSTICE: The challenge of integrating conflict resolution and human rights * (April 4, 2013)
* Sponsored by UMass Psychology of Peace and Violence Program and the Public Education for Peacebuilding Support Initiative of the
United States Institute of Peace (USIP).
|
Speaking as both a scholar and a practitioner, Babbitt will discuss a core challenge that she has experienced when facilitating track 2 discussions in specific types of international conflict: how to catalyze a process that supports both peace and justice, in cases where there are large power asymmetries between disputing parties, and massive human rights violations are being or have been committed. Her experiences (in Israel-Palestine, Turkey-Armenia, and Rwanda among others) have led her to look more closely at what she perceives to be a tension between the goals of conflict resolution and those of human rights. In relation to conflict resolution, she will speak specifically about processes that seek to bring disputing parties together with the assistance of a third-party mediator. She will be using human rights as a proxy for justice-seeking, including accountability mechanisms for human rights abuses, war crimes, and genocide. She wants to frame a series of questions to consider and think about, relating to the appropriate or effective role for a third party in these challenging contexts.
Eileen F. Babbitt is Professor of International Conflict Management Practice and Director of the International Negotiation and Conflict Resolution Program at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. She is also a Faculty Associate of the Program on Negotiation at the Harvard Law School and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Her research interests include identity-based conflicts; coexistence and trust-building in the aftermath of civil war; and the interface between human rights concerns and peacebuilding. Her practice as a facilitator and trainer has included work in the Middle East, the Balkans, and with U.S. government agencies, regional intergovernmental organizations, and international and local NGOs. Before joining the Fletcher faculty, Professor Babbitt was Director of Education and Training at the United States Institute of Peace in Washington, D.C. and Deputy Director of the Program on International Conflict Analysis and Resolution at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University. Professor Babbitt’s latest publications include the forthcoming article, “The Evolution of Internaional Conflict Resolution: From Cold War to Peacebuilding.” Negotiation Journal, 25th Anniversary Issue, and Human Rights and Conflict Resolution in Context: Colombia, Sierra Leone, and Northen Ireland. Co-edited with Ellen Lutz and published by Syracuse University Press. Dr. Babbitt holds a Master’s Degree in Public Policy from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, and a Ph.D. from MIT.
________________________________________
|
Brian K. Barber |
CONSIDERING THE LONG-TERM IMPACT OF POLITICAL CONFLICT ON YOUTH: SIMPLE QUESTION, COMPLEX ANSWERS * (March 11, 2013)
* This event is co-sponsored by The Psychology of Peace and Violence Program and The Rudd Adoption Research Program.
|
One of the major limitations of the burgeoning research literature on the impact of political conflict on young people is the absence of long-term assessments. Since the vast majority of youth in conflict zones survive the conflict, the conventional focus of correlating violence exposure with psychological functioning (e.g., PTSD) is inadequately informative. What we don't know is if and how having spent adolescence immersed in political conflict impacts one's forward progress, particularly in terms of being prepared for the transitions to adulthood and citizenship. This presentation describes an on-going study of Palestinian adults who as youth were the heralded generation of stone throwers of the first intifada. Detailed in the presentation will be the challenges of designing such a study, including the basic, yet highly complex, tasks of measuring wellbeing in such a population and capturing conflict and other key life events across the pathway to adulthood. Preliminary findings will be presented.
Brian K. Barber is the founding director of the Center for the Study of Youth and Political Conflict (http://csypc.utk.edu), professor of child and family studies, and adjunct professor of psychology, all at the University of Tennessee. Dr. Barber has studied youth development in social context in Africa, Asia, the Balkans, Europe, the Middle East, and North and South America. He specializes in the study of youth in contexts of political conflict, particularly in the occupied Palestinian territories, Bosnia, and Egypt. His work has been supported by the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health, the Social Science Research Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Jerusalem Fund, and the United States Institute for Peace. Most recently, the Jacobs Foundation (Zurich, Switzerland) is funding two of the Center’s projects: a 4-year study of the life histories of current Palestinian adults who were youth during the first intifada, and a 2-year study of youth of the Egyptian revolution. Dr. Barber publishes his work regularly in leading social science journals. He is also the author/editor of Intrusive Parenting: How Psychological Control affects Children and Adolescents (2002, American Psychological Association Press) and Adolescents and War: How Youth Deal with Political Conflict (2009, Oxford University Press).
________________________________________
|
Graeme Simpson |
BEST PRACTICES IN INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND PEACEBUILDING* (February 28, 2013)
Easier Said Than Done: a practical reflection on peace, justice and reconciliation in the wake of violent conflict…and how we know if we are succeeding.
* Sponsored by The Public Education for Peacebuilding Support Initiative of the United States Instiute of Peace (USIP)
|
Graeme is the Director of Policy and Learning at Interpeace and he is also the Director of Interpeace USA. Interpeace is a global peace-building organization headquartered in Geneva and working in 18 conflict and immediate post-conflict zones around the world for the past decade and a half.
Graeme Simpson has a law degree (LLB) and a Masters degree in History from the University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. He was a co-founder (1989) and Executive Director of the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR), in Johannesburg, South Africa, until April 2005. In 2005, he was appointed as the Director of Country Programs at the International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), headquartered in New York City and in that capacity oversaw the organization’s work in more than twenty five countries around the globe. Thereafter, he was the Director of Thematic Programs at the ICTJ for two further years, and oversaw work on Prosecutions, Reparations, Truth-Seeking, Security System Reform, Memorials, Gender, and a program on Peace & Justice.
Simpson also co-founded and now serves on the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Transitional Justice (IJTJ) published by Oxford University Press. He is a member of the International Advisory Board of The International Conflict Research Institute (INCORE) in Northern Ireland. He is an Adjunct Professor and has taught a post-graduate seminar on Transitional Justice at Columbia Law School since 2006. Simpson has published widely in books and journals covering a wide range of issues.
________________________________________
|
David Mednicoff
|
Law and the Arab Uprisings of 2011: Theorizing legal issues and political change in non-Western contexts.
(December 6, 2012)
Prof. David Mednicoff directs the Master's in Public Policy and Middle Eastern Studies programs at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. His areas of expertise include Middle Eastern law and politics, international law, human rights, globalization studies and comparative public policy. He holds a J.D. and Ph.D. from Harvard University. He has written on Arab constitutional politics and Islam before and after the events of 2011, the legal regulation of migrant workers in the Arab Gulf, human rights in the Middle East and humanitarian intervention.
|
ABSTRACT: Law is frequently held out as useful in mitigating conflicts among individuals, and, in the global sphere, among countries. But how does it manage relations between individuals and the state? This question, which has been important to centuries of social theorists, is particularly relevant to the contemporary Arab world, where the recent wave of uprisings has included demands and reform efforts around better regime accountability to citizens. He will discuss several strands of his current research that consider links among law, religion and political accountability in five Arab states, with an emphasis on the interaction of Islamic and international legal ideas, and the roles that legal activists have played with respect to political change.
|
|
________________________________________
James Waller Ph.D.
Keene State College
|
Benefits and Challenges Associated With Conducting Research in Field Settings
(April 26, 2012)
Dr. James Waller is the Cohen Endowed Chair of Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Keene State College. His study of this phenomenon led him to write Becoming Evil: How Ordinary People Commit Genocide and Mass Killing, now in its second edition with Oxford University Press, in which he synthesizes a wide range of studies to create an impressive theory of how average citizens can come to participate in acts of unspeakable atrocity. Dr. Waller also continues his work at the Auschwitz Institute for Peace and Reconciliation, which brings government policy makers, military leaders, and NGO activists to Auschwitz in Poland so they can learn to recognize the signs of genocide and use their influence to stop it.
|
________________________________________
Cora Fernandez Anderson, Ph.D.
Political Science, University of Notre Dame |
The Other Struggle: Human Rights Movements and Demand for Truth and Justice in Argentina, Chile and Uruguay (Febraury 23, 2012)
Cora Fernandez Anderson (PhD Political Science, University of Notre Dame) is a Visiting Professor at the Gender and Politics Department at Mount Holyoke College. Her work focuses on women and human rights movements and their interaction with democratic governments in order to achieve their demands. In particular, Cora has researched human rights movements demanding judicial accountability for the abuses committed under the military dictatorships in the Southern Cone. Despite these countries sharing many cultural, social and economic characteristics, the way they have addressed human rights abuses since the time of their respective democratic transitions have varied widely. An examination of the human rights movements' strength and their alliances with political actors in each of these cases begins to cast light into these different outcomes.
|
________________________________________
Rita Guerra
Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Psychological Research and Social Intervention
Lisbon University Institute, Portugal
|
The Complexity of Little "we's":
What do they think about us and how do we feel about that? (December 1, 2011)
Dr. Rita Guerra is interested in intergroup relations among racial majority and minority youth and contact-based interventions to reduce prejudice in childhood. In her research, she studies how children's minority/majority status influences their emotional responses to intergroup contact. She will present findings from her study of White and Black Portuguese children showing how the salience of different group representations during contact (e.g., as "one group identity" or "dual identity") influences the appraisal systems children use to interpret intergroup encounters, which trigger positive and negative intergroup emotions, and in turn, positive and negative behaviors toward other groups.
|
|
________________________________________
Nina Siulc
Assistant Professor, Legal Studies Program,
Department of Political Science
University of Massachusetts Amherst
|
Deportation, Violence,
and "Securocratic Wars" in the Americas (November 10, 2011)
Dr. Nina Siulc, an anthropologist in the Legal Studies program, has conducted numerous research studies exploring the human impact of detention and deportation policies. She will discuss the violence surrounding new mass deportations of persons convicted of crimes in the United States and sent back to the Dominican Republic, where new penalized spaces and privatized governance projects have emerged in response to the fears engendered by purportedly dangerous deportees. The violence accompanying the formal and informal policing of and "retraining" practices directed at criminalized deportees--by both police officers and non-state actors--can be seen as part of a larger set of what Feldman dubs "securocratic wars" that have emerged in response to new perceived security threats across the Americas, threats that both result from and intersect with new instabilities wrought by nascent forms of democratic governance in post-dictatorial nations like the Dominican Republic.
|
|
________________________________________
Dr. Jill Irvine
Presidential Professor and Director of Women’s and Gender Studies
University of Oklahoma
|
From Civil Society to Civil Servants: Women, War, and Political Transformation in the Balkans (March 24, 2011)
Cynthia Enloe and others have argued that while war has a devastating impact on women it can also open up space for a reconfiguration of gender relations. But, under what conditions can a more egalitarian postwar order be achieved? This study of women’s organizing during war and post war reconstruction in Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo attempts to answer this question. To what extent, I ask, have women’s organizations achieved their goals of political transformation and gender equality? In what ways have they shaped the post war processes of refugee return, reconciliation and human security? In seeking to understand strategies and their impact, I focus on the interplay between structure and agency—examining the ways in which domestic and particularly international actors and forces shaped the strategic choices of women’s organizations and activists.
|
|
________________________________________
Title: Social Identity, Political Violence and Psychological Distress: Some lessons for peace and reconciliation from Northern Ireland (February 17, 2011)
The talk will review theory and research from Northern Ireland and other regions affected by conflict to consider the relationship between mental health and political violence. I will argue that the orientation of theory and research aimed at understanding the onset of psychopathology in response to political violence has been particularly informed by Western individualistic constructions of social phenomena. This approach calls for an extension of understanding of psychological distress and post-traumatic stress in response to political violence by considering how a group level analysis can inform incidence, diagnosis and expression of psychopathology. Drawing on a group level analysis, I use the integrated social identity model of stress, to consider some of the paradoxical consequences of identity processes for mental health and social attitudes in Northern Ireland.
|
Orla Muldoon, Department of Psychology, University of Limerick |
________________________________________
|
Dr. Bar-Tal |
Socio-Psychological Barriers to Conflict Resolution (November 4, 2010)
Daniel Bar-Tal is Branco Weiss Professor of Research in Child Development and Education at the School of Education and past director of the Walter Lebach Institute for Jewish-Arab Coexistence through Education, Tel Aviv University. His research interests lie in political and social psychology studying the foundations of intractable conflicts and peace-making.
|
He has authored over two hundred papers in social and political psychological journals and books. In 1991 and again in 2009, he received the SPSSI Otto Klineberg Intercultural and International Relations Prize and in 2000-2001 he was awarded the Golestan Fellowship at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Science. In 2006, he received the Alexander George Award from the International Society of Political Psychology for the best book in Political Psychology, as well as the Peace Scholar Award from the Peace and Justice Studies Association for distinguished scholarship in the study of conflict and peace-making.
|
________________________________________
|
"War in the Consciousness: The Making and Unmaking of a Marine" (October 7, 2010)
Tyler Boudreau is a 12-year veteran of the Marine Corps infantry and served in the Iraq War in 2004. He is author of the book Packing Inferno: The Unmaking of a Marine and his writing has appeared in many publications including the New York Times, Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune, and the Progressive. In 2008, Boudreau traveled to Jordan to investigate and raise awareness about the on-going Iraq refugee crisis. In 2009, he bicycled across the country to talk with communities about war and post-traumatic stress. He now lives in Northampton and is a graduate student in the Communication Department here at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
|
 |
________________________________________
Dr. Glendene Lemard, Research Assistant Professor, Health Policy & Management, the School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst; the Managing Director for the Greater Springfield- University of Massachusetts Amherst Partnership.
|
Source: umass.edu/sphhs/chs/hpm/faculty/lemard.html
|
Class, Culture and Violence in Jamaica: What We Don't Know Can Hurt Us. (December 3, 2009)
Jamaica is a small island developing state with one of the highest murder rates in the world. It is a democratic society with a stable system of government and many of the murders stem from interpersonal disputes such as acts of revenge, robberies and drug or gang-related activity. There is much discussion on the root causes of violence in the country but empirical analyses of the patterns in killing tend to reveal issues not readily seen or acknowledged by the society.
|
This presentation will examine the patterns of killings in Jamaica since independence in 1962 up to 2007 and will discuss the implications for health and development. The presentation will also examine the underlying factors that impact the growth in violence in the country which include the class structure, inequality and distinctions in access to opportunities. It will also examine social norms and mores that promote a culture of violence. Seemingly, "nonsensical killings" as in the case of some reprisals and many mob killings may in fact have patterns not readily apparent that suggest a rhyme and reason for such action. The information garnered can help to inform strategies to boost violence prevention efforts which will also be discussed.
|
________________________________________
|
Dr. Andrew Papachristos, Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts Amherst and Visiting Scholar, Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government.
|
The Corner and the Crew: The Role of Inter-Group Conflict and Geographic Turf on GangViolence. (October 22, 2009)
Dr. Andrew Papachristos’ research uses social network analysis to examine: the social structures and group processes at the heart of interpersonal violence and delinquency; issues of group dominance and reciprocity; and the use of violence and honor as measures of social control.
|
Source: .umass.edu/sociol/faculty_staff/
papachristos.html |
In this presentation he uses a social network approach to examine the influence of two dimensions of street gangs on violent behavior: inter-group conflict and the overlap of geographic turf. Inter-group conflict and gang turf are essential aspects of gang formation, group identity, and the collective processes at the foundation of many gang behaviors, including violence. Using incident level police records and detailed maps of turf boundaries, this paper recreates and analyzes gang violence by examining the social networks of action and reaction that create them. The findings suggest that individual violent interactions between gangs create an institutionalized network of group conflict, net of any gang’s size, racial composition, group specific effects, and turf overlap. Violence moves through these networks through an epidemic-like process of social contagion that is fueled by dominance considerations of gangs jockeying for social status.
|
_________________________________________
Dr. Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela, Professor of Psychology University of Cape Town, South Africa, and award winning author of the book, A Human Being Died That Night.
Image: huntalternatives.org |
Working through the Past: Some Thoughts on Forgiveness in Cultural Context.
(September 17, 2009)
In this presentation, Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela will explore forgiveness of perpetrators as a unique outcome of the truth commission method in the aftermath of mass violence and political conflict. She will briefly identify some developmental trends in the debates on forgiveness in the context of mass atrocity. |
Using a case example from the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, she will explore the development of empathy in an encounter between victims and a perpetrator in the context of the perpetrator’s remorseful apology on the one hand, and the victims’ forgiveness on the other. She will consider the subtleties of cultural language in the dialogical exchange between victims and perpetrators when both victims and perpetrators are black Africans, and argue that apology and forgiveness provide impetus for transformation. The apology and forgiveness response in politics should be viewed as an essential feature of human connectedness, and a moral imperative necessary to restore hope before the work of reconciliation can start.
|
_________________________________________
Dr. Jorge Manzi, Professor of Psychology and Director of the Center for Measurement in the School of Psychology at Pontificia Universidad Catolica in Santiago, Chile.
Political Reconciliation in Post-Pinochet Chile: Political and Psychosocial Processes.
(March 26, 2009)
Manzi's research in social psychology concentrates on political phenomena, including such diverse themes as the development of political ideas and affiliations among youth, collective memory for political events, and the role of emotions in processes of reconciliation. Currently, he is conducting a large-scale panel study to examine aspects of political culture among three generations of Chileans.
|
Image; puc.cl/ficha_profesor.php?idProfesor=23 |
_________________________________________
Dr. Elizabeth Levy Paluck, Assistant Professor of Psychology at Princeton University and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs; Academy Scholar at Harvard Academy for
International Affairs, Harvard University.
Image: dakartoportloko.com/Site/Expert Reviews.html |
Deference, Dissent, and Dispute Resolution: An Experimental Intervention using Mass Media to Change Norms and Behavior in Rwanda.
(March 5, 2009)
Deference and dissent strike a delicate balance in any polity. Insufficient deference to authority may incapacitate government; too much may allow leaders to orchestrate mass violence. Although cross-national and cross-temporal variation in deference to authority and willingness to express dissent has long been studied in the social sciences, rarely have scholars studied programs designed to change these aspects of political culture.
|
The present study, situated in post-genocide Rwanda, reports a qualitative and quantitative assessment of one such attempt, a radio program aimed at discouraging blind obedience and reliance on direction from authorities, and at promoting independent thought and local initiative in problem solving. This radio program or a control program dealing with HIV were randomly presented over the course of one year to pairs of communities, including communities of genocide survivors, Twa people, and imprisoned génocidaires. Changes in individual attitudes, community norms, and deliberative behaviors were assessed using closed-ended interviews, focus group discussions, role-play exercises, and unobtrusive measures of collective decision-making. Although the radio program had little effect on many kinds of beliefs and attitudes, it did have a substantial impact on listeners' willingness to express dissent and the way they resolved communal problems. Consistent with some arguments regarding the origins of political culture, these results suggest that certain aspects of political culture are changeable, at least in the short run.
|
_________________________________________
Dr. Joanne Corbin,
Associate Professor of Social Work, Smith College School of Social Work.
Returning to Normal in Northern Uganda: A Qualitative Study of Individuals' Experiences to Return Home After Armed Conflict.
(February 12, 2009)
The 20 year armed conflict in Northern Uganda involving the LRA diminished in intensity by 2006-2007. Residents of Internally Displaced Persons' (IDP) camps were being encouraged to return to their former home areas. This qualitative study examines the experiences of residents that were settled in one IDP camp. Some have return to resettlement villages or their former villages; others have decided to remain in the camp.
|
Image: .smith.edu/ssw/admin/faculty_corbin.php |
Responses from those interviewed help us to understand the decisions around remaining in the camp or returning home. Whether individuals decided to remain or return, all had to make choices about resuming livelihoods, re-establishing cultural practices and values, and recreating community. This study is an extension of Dr. Corbin's 2005 study on resettlement experiences of formerly abducted children in Northern Uganda.
|
_________________________________________
Dr. Wenona Rymond-Richmond,
Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Dehumanization and Racial Epithets in the Darfur Genocide.
(December 4, 2008)
Sociologists empirically and theoretically neglect genocide. Our critical collective framing perspective begins by focusing on state origins of race based ideology in the mobilization and dehumanization leading to genocide.
|
Image: umass.edu/sociol/faculty_staff/rymondrich.html |
We elaborate this transformative dynamic by identifying racially driven macro-micro-macro level processes which are theoretically underdeveloped and contested in many settings.
We investigate generic processes by exploiting an unprecedented survey of refugees from the ongoing genocide in Darfur. Our focus is on the Sudanese government’s crisis framing of a dehumanizing collective process. Sudanese forces joined with Janjaweed militia to attack black African settlements. They aggregated and concentrated racial epithets in a collective process of dehumanization and organized terror which amplified the severity of genocidal victimization, the lethal and lasting scar of the genocidal state. Our findings question primordial and counter-insurgency explanations, while supporting aspects of the instrumental, population-resource, constructionist and cognitive perspectives that form the foundation of our critical collective framing perspective.
|
_________________________________________
Dr. Nurit Shnabel, Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychology, Yale University, Department of Psychology; Department of Education and Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel. |
|
The Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation.
(November 13, 2008)
In recent years there has been a growing understanding that agreements that aim to end conflicts between adversaries should address emotional issues such as mutual respect, acceptance, compassion, and justice, and that failing to do so will leave these agreements particularly fragile. This understanding is reflected in the growing interest in the concept of reconciliation, the process of removing the emotional barriers that block the path to harmonious relations.
|
In particular, the Needs-Based Model suggests that following a victimization episode both victims and perpetrators experience a threat to differential dimensions of their identities, and that the reciprocal removal of these threats through symbolic gestures may promote reconciliation between former adversaries. The applicability of this model to various conflicts, such as the ones between Israelis and Arabs, Jews and Germans, or between majority and minority groups within the same society (e.g., Blacks and Whites in the USA) was examined. Policy implications drawn from the model was discussed.
|
_________________________________________
Dr. Ed Cairns, Professor of Psychology, University of Ulster, UK.
The Contact Hypothesis in Northern Ireland: Research, Policy, and Practice (April 1, 2008)
Dr. Ed Cairns teaches Psychology at the University of Ulster and has been a visiting scholar at the universities of Florida, Cape Town, and Melbourne. Most of his work has investigated the psychological aspects of political violence in relation to conflict in Northern Ireland. He is a Fellow of the British Psychological Society and a past President of the Division of Peace Psychology of the American Psychological Association.
|
Dr. Ed Cairns, Source: www2.ulster.ac.uk/staff/e.cairns.html |
__________________________________________
Dr. Jacqueline Urla,
Associate Professor of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Source: umass.edu/anthro/faculty/images/faces/Jackie.jpg
|
Basque Social
Movements on Trial (February 28, 2008).
Dr. Urla reflects on how research
on language and cultural activism has changed in light of new anti
terrorist strategies in the Basque Country of Spain.
|
In 1996, the
special anti-terrorist court of Spain, the Audiencia Nacional, began a
new strategy for eliminating nationalist political violence that
targeted what they call the social and economic “infrastructure” of
ETA. The activities she had been documenting as an
ethnographer -- language revitalization and civil disobedience -- once
considered quite distinct from political violence, came under
suspicion and their authors have been arrested and imprisoned. As
the line between legitimate forms of dissent and political violence were
blurred, she found herself confronted with new ethical
challenges. She used the case of the virtually unreported
trial of civic dissenters concluded in December 2007 as an
example of the new climate of fear and intimidation and the questions
it has posed for her as an anthropologist with long-term ties to
individuals who now find themselves in prison.
|
|
__________________________________________
Dr. Nida Bikmen, Assistant Professor of Psychology, Denison University. |
History, Memory
and Identity: Remembering the Homeland in Exile. (November 2, 2007).
Dr. Bikmen's research explored the effects of
collective memory on intergroup relations amoSng refugees from Bosnia
and Herzegovina.
|
Source: web.gc.cuny.edu/psychology/socpersonality/
images/alumni/nbikmen.jpg |
After receiving a master’s degree in psychology
from Bogazici University in her native Istanbul, Turkey, Dr. Bikmen
began her doctoral studies at the Graduate
Center of City University of New York. She received her degree in
social psychology in 2007 and is currently an Assistant Professor of
Psychology at Denison University in Ohio.
In her research, Dr.
Bikmen has examined various aspects of group identities and relations
using methodologies ranging from experimental manipulations to in-depth
interviews and focus groups. Much of her current work
investigates issues associated with immigration, ethnic and national
identification, perceived disadvantage, and attitudes toward collective
action.
|
In addition, Dr. Bikmen and Dr. Jacqueline Mosselson (Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts Amherst) co-facilitated an open discussion on conducting researh with immigrant and refugee populations.
|
Dr. Jacqueline Mosselson is an assistant professor at the Center for International Education (UMass Amherst). She earned her Doctor of Philosophy in comparative education and developmental psychopathology (2002) and a Master’s of International Affairs in economic and political development (1997) from Columbia University.
|
Source: umass.edu/cie/faculty_staff/index.htm |
Her doctoral dissertation, Roots and Routes: Re-imagining the Reactive Identities of Bosnian Adolescent Female Refugees, explored the ways adolescent refugees understand and self-identities in the context of flight and relocation and the impact of education on the refugee condition. Dr. Mosselson has worked as a consultant for the International Rescue Committee, examining health-related issues in the Republic of Georgia, psychosocial functioning among escapees from the Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda, and as part of an evaluation team examining Afghan refugee school programs in Pakistan. She has also worked as a consultant for Unicef in Mongolia.
|
|
__________________________________________
Dr. Ulrich
Wagner, Professor of Social Psychology and Director of the Center
for Conflict Studies, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany. |
Prejudice in
Germany (October 9, 2007)
Although Germany has
always been a country with immigrants, until recently, German politics
had officially considered the country as “non-immigrant.” This
paper described current relations between Germans and immigrants,
with a special focus on German majorities’ prejudice toward immigrant
minorities in their country.
|
Dr. Ulrich Wagner |
Data from large scale surveys demonstrate
how many processes and theories used to explain ethnic prejudice can be
applied to understanding Germans’ prejudice against immigrants.
In particular, data show that an increase in
the immigrant population at the district level (county) corresponds
with reduced prejudice, as predicted by intergroup contact theory.
|
__________________________________________
Dr.
M. Brinton Lykes, Professor and Associate Director, Center for Human Rights and International Justice, Boston College
Photo: Dr. M. Brinton Lykes bc.edu/schools/lsoe/facultystaff/faculty/lykes.html
|
Feminist-Infused
Participatory Action Research and Universal Human Rights: Challenges
from field work in rural Guatemala and urban USA
(March 26, 2007)
Dr. Brinton Lykes has collaborated with women and their families in community-based participatory action research exploring the interface of indigenous cultural beliefs and practices and those of Western psychology and in the development of programs that respond to the effects of violence in war and post-war contexts of transition and transformation.
|
|
She has worked for many years with mental health and human rights and women’s groups in Guatemala and, more recently, in South Africa and Northern Ireland. In each of these contexts she has also collaborated in the design and facilitation of training programs using participatory methodologies that draw heavily on the creative arts (drama, creative storytelling, art, etc.) and in direct service with women and child survivors of sexual and other forms of violence in war and in urban contexts in the USA.
|
__________________________________________
|
Dr. Demis Glasford, Assistant Professor of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
The Struggle Within:
Responding to Ingroup Violation of Personal Values (March 2, 2007)
Dr. Glasford's research draws on cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger, 1957) and social identity theory (Tajfel, 1978) to examine intragroup dissonance, a discrepancy between one's personal values and the behavior of one's ingroup that results in psychological discomfort.
|
Photo: Dr. Demis Glasford jjay.cuny.edu/psychology/facultyprofile/glasford.asp |
Across three experiments, Dr. Glasford manipulated whether participants' ingroup violated a personal value, measured participants' emotional responses and use of dissonance-reduction strategies. As expected, individuals experienced psychological discomfort (but not negative self-directed emotion), when an ingroup, but not an outgroup, violated a personal value. In all experiments, disidentification was used as a dissonance-reduction strategy, such that psychological discomfort mediated the tendency to disidentify when the ingroup violated the personal value. Results are discussed with respect to social identity, cognitive dissonance theory and intragroup dynamics.
|
__________________________________________
Dr. Emily Erikson, Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of Massachusetts Amherst. |
Source: umass.edu/sadri/people.html |
Central Authority and Order (November 17, 2006)
Strong central authorities are able to effectively manage costly defection, but are unable to adequately address lesser conflicts because of limits to their ability to monitor and enforce. We argue, counter-intuitively, that these limitations build cooperation and trust among subordinates: the limitations contribute to the production of order.
|
Through an examination of case studies, we isolate and describe the mechanisms by which central authority produces order as they operate in varied settings. We find that central authority may be effective, but the majority of this effectiveness derives from an indirect influence on dyadic relations rather than direct intervention. We briefly explore implications for the operation of law as well as the production of generalized trust.
|
Dr. Erikson's research interests include economic integration, the role of eastern markets in the development of capitalism, the relationship between organizational and network structure, and network dynamics. Her research incorporates multiple methods and uses a social mechanism-based explanatory approach to social processes. Recent research includes how organizations shape the expansion of foreign trade, the indirect effects of centralized authority on community-level relations, and the role of decentralized Asian markets in 17th-century market expansion. Her most recent publication, co-authored with Peter Bearman and published in AJS, traced the positive impact of employee malfeasance in the English East India Company on organizational growth and the construction of the first global trade network. This research was covered by UPI and Scientific American. In addition to her teaching and research activities, Professor Erikson serves as Associate Editor for Social Science History.
|
|
________________________________________ |
