Vegetation Transition Model


Pinyon-Juniper-Oak-Serviceberry Woodland



      Description.---Pinyon-juniper-oak-serviceberry woodland is dominated by pinyon pine (Pinus edulis) and Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) trees, with a sparse to dense shrub understory of Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii), serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia), and sometimes also snowberry (Symphoricarpos rotundifolius) or bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata). Pinyon pine and Utah juniper trees, combined, make up the largest component within a stand (comprise a plurality in association with other species). They both are present in most stands, the former usually more abundant on cooler, moister sites, the latter more abundant on warmer, drier sites. Consequently, juniper tends to be more abundant at the lower elevations, pinyon tends to be more abundant at the higher elevations (Woodin and Lindsey 1954, Heil et al. 1993). At the highest elevations, Utah juniper may be replaced by Rocky mountain juniper (Juniperus scopulorum). Tree density is highly variable among sites, ranging from dense, closed-canopy stands to sparse, open-canopy stands with widely scattered trees, although tree cover tends to increase with elevation due to greater precipitation and reduced evapotranspiration at the higher elevations (Spencer and Romme 1996). Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), or Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees may be present in some stands, but usually as minor components (< 10% canopy cover).


      The understory is variable in composition, but is distinguished from other pinyon-juniper woodland types by the presence of tall, sprouting shrubs such as Gambel oak and serviceberry. These shrub species sprout vigorously following disturbance and grow tall (2-3 m), providing ladder fuels that facilitate crown fire spread. Herb composition is highly variable, depending on the shrub and tree cover, and may include cool-season grasses, notably muttongrass (Poa fendleriana), and a wide variety of forbs such as Wyethia amplexicaulis, lupine (Lupinus argenteus), Lathyrus pauciflorus, peavine (Lathyrus leucanthus), Penstemon linarioides, and Delphinium nelsoni.


      Terrestrial cryptogams composed of cyanobacteria, algae, lichen, moss, fungi, or liverwort are often significant components in pinyon-juniper woodlands forming crusts on the ground surface that contribute to soil stability, nutrient supply (organic matter and nitrogen), and biodiversity.


      Distribution.--Pinyon-juniper-sagebrush woodland is found at middle to high elevations (Figure-distribution map; Figure-elevation chart; Table-areal coverage). It is usually found on sandstone substrates in the semi-arid climate zone, and is usually intermixed with other pinyon-juniper woodlands, ponderosa pine forests, warm-dry mixed conifer forests, mountain shrublands, and xeric sagebrush shrublands. Similar communities are found in many parts of western Colorado (Floyd et al. 2000, Spencer et al. 1996).


      Stand conditions.–We recognized four separate stand conditions:

 

      1.   Herb dominated (HD) – This is the initial short-lived successional stage following a severe disturbance. Stands are dominated by a mixture of short-lived native herbaceous species, including Chenopodium fremontii and the fire-dependent Nicotiana attenuata, as well as re-sprouting native grasses and forbs including Poa fendleriana and Wyethia amplexicaulis. Non-native annuals and biennials such as Bromus tectorum, Lactuca serriola, and Alyssum minor may dominate in highly disturbed sites.

 

      2.   Herbs - Shrubs (HS) – Within approximately a decade after a severe disturbance, the dominant shrubs re-sprout and form a dense cover of low shrubs. The early successional herbs are also present and have high cover.

 

      3.   Shrubs - Trees (ST) – The shrubs dominate the stand, often with 50% or more total cover. Herb cover is greatly diminished, though the grasses and perennial forbs of earlier successional stages are still present and young Pinus edulis and/or Juniperus osteosperma are poking through the shrub canopy. Note, this condition also includes stands in the aftermath of a pinyon decline outbreak in which percent tree cover and the proportion that are pinyon pine are reduced substantially, or eliminated altogether, although the junipers persist. Stands in this stage that transitioned from the tree-dominated stage following a pinyon decline disturbance may include a low percent tree cover of old junipers.

 

      4.   Tree Dominated (TD) – The stand is dominated by a mature and often dense canopy of Pinus edulis and/or Juniperus osteosperma. The shurbs and perennial herbs are still present, but have low total cover.


      Succession Transitions.–Succession transitions occur as follows (Figure-model):

 

      1.   HD - persists from stand age 0 until age 10, after which all stands transition to the HS condition.

 

      2.   HS - persists until age 50, after which stands begin transitioning to the ST condition. Stands may persist in the HS condition until age 70, after which all stands will have transitioned to ST contingent upon having been in the HS condition for at least 30 years.

 

      3.   ST - persists until age 150, after which stands begin transitioning to the TD condition. Stands may persist in the ST condition until age 200, after which all stands will have transitioned to TD contingent upon having been in the ST condition for at least 80 years.

 

      4.   TD - persists until the next stand-replacing disturbance.

 

*Note, see Succession Rules for the formal implementation of these rules in RMLANDS.


      Wildfire Disturbance Transitions.--Fire kills the trees and shrubs, most of which must re-establish from seed. Herbaceous plants lose above-ground biomass to fire, but most promptly re-sprout from surviving below-ground organs. Wildfires invoke the following potential transitions (Figure-model):

 

      1.   HD – high mortality wildfire recycles the stand through the HD condition while a low mortality wildfire maintains this condition.

 

      2.   HS – high mortality wildfire returns the stand to the HD condition while a low mortality wildfire maintains the stand in this condition.

 

      3.   ST – high mortality wildfire returns the stand back to the HD condition while a low mortality wildfire maintains the stand in this condition.

 

      4.   TD – high mortality wildfire returns the stand to the HD condition while a low mortality wildfire maintains the stand in this condition.

 

*Note, see Disturbance Rules for the formal implementation of these rules in RMLANDS.


      Insect/Pathogen Disturbance Transitions.–Pinyon decline kills pinyon trees of all sizes, but does not directly affect junipers, shrubs, or herbs, and invokes the following potential transitions (Figure-model):

 

      1.   HD – not susceptible to pinyon decline.

 

      2.   HS – high or low mortality pinyon decline maintains the stand in this condition because the juniper component survives the outbreak, after which the stand resumes its usual successional trajectory.

 

      3.   ST – high mortality pinyon decline returns the stand to the HS condition while a low mortality pinyon decline recycles the stand through this condition. Note, high mortality pinyon decline returns the stand to the HS condition only when the tree component is relatively pure pinyon pine; otherwise, the juniper trees would survive and maintain the stand in the ST condition. Thus, for purposes of RMLANDS modeling, since we did not attempt to map the distribution of pure pinyon pine-oak-serviceberry, we estimated the proportion of this cover type that was pure pinyon (and therefore subject to a high mortality outbreak) and used this to estimate the high versus low mortality response following an epidemic.

 

      4.   TD – high mortality pinyon decline returns the stand to the HS condition while low mortality pinyon decline returns the stand to the ST condition. Similar to the ST condition, the high mortality response was based on an estimate of the proportion of this cover type that was pure pinyon.

 

*Note, see Disturbance Rules for the formal implementation of these rules in RMLANDS.