Apple Scion/Rootstock Selection and Planning for MichiganR.L. Perry and J. Hull Dept. of Horticulture Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824J. M. Clements MSU Berrien County Extension Benton Harbor, MI 49122 (Jon Clements is now an extension tree-fruit specialist with UMass Extension's Fruit Team) |
The training system that a grower selects must be one which best maximizes all the resources in making the enterprise a profitable venture. There are many parts to the orchard system decision "puzzle" (Barritt, 1991) which must fit together in a complementary arrangement to make it work. The most immediate question that must be answered regarding the establishment of a new orchard is spacing. In 1989, we made an initial attempt at trying to simplify the decision making process by considering the most important variables and assigning them values (# codes in parentheses) in a formula. Our experience gained from working with the high density orchards and with new cultivars has encouraged us to revise the 1989 model. More revision in the future will be necessary as we learn more of the technical intricacies of new rootstocks, cultivars, marketing demands and management constraints.
The primary factors affecting spacing include; scion vigor, rootstock vigor, soil type, irrigation, management intensity and the interactions that take place between them. The spacing recommendation in this writing pertains to single row arrangement of trees. Use the on-line form below to calculate in-row tree spacing based on your input:
The formula: (assume North/South row direction)
In-row tree spacing =
Scion vigor + Rootstock vigor + Soil type + Irrigation + Management Intensity (*)
* For high density systems multiply In-row tree spacing by system factors
Vertical Axe and Hytec (0.7), Slender Spindle (0.6), V Trellis (0.4).
Row spacing width (minimum distance) = 1.3 x expected or projected tree height
(for East/West row direction = use 1.5)
Example 1: Idared / M.26, sandy (droughty) soil, drip irrigated, on stakes, expect 12
ft. high tree:
In-row tree spacing =(A.) 2 + (B.) 2.5 + (C.) 1 + (D.) 2 + (E.) 0 = 7.5 feet
Row spacing = 1.3 x 12 = 15.6 feet (7.5 x15.6 ft).
Ex. 2: McIntosh / MM.106, sandy soil, no irrigation, low intensity, expect 14 ft. high
tree:
In-row tree spacing = 4 + 7 + 0 + 0 + 3= 14 feet
Row spacing = 1.3 x 14 = 18.2 feet (14 x18.2 ft).
Ex. 3: Jonagold / M.9 EMLA, fair vigor soil, drip irrigated, V.Axe, expect 10 ft. high
tree:
In-row tree spacing = 3 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 0 = 8 x 0.7 = 5.6 feet
Row spacing = 1.3 x 10 = 13 feet (5.6 x13 ft).
Ex. 4: Empire / Mark, vigorous clay loam soil, drip irrig., slender spindle, expect 8
ft. high tree:
In-row tree spacing = 2 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 0 = 8 x 0.6 = 4.8 feet
Row spacing = 1.3 x 8 = 10.4 feet (4.8 x 10.4 ft).
References
Crassweller, R. M. and P.H. Heinemann and E.G. Rajotte. 1989. An expert system on a microcomputer for determining apple tree spacing. HortScience 24 (1): 148.
Barritt, B. 1991. The Hytec orchard system for apples. Compact Fruit Tree 24: 17-25.
Barritt, B. 1991. Choosing the components of an orchard system. Compact Fruit Tree 24: 26-30.
Oberhofer, H. 1987. Schnitt der schlanken spindel. Pub. Sudtiroler Ber. Obst und Wein Bau. p. 83.
Perry, R.L. 1989. Why tree stakes are becoming so popular. Compact Fruit Tree 22:33-34.
Lespinase, J.M. 1980. La conduite du pommier, l'axe vertical la renovation des vergers 2e partie. Cebtre Technique Interprofessional des Fruits et Legumes, Paris. 120 p.