| New office helping researchers meet
federal rules by Daniel
J. Fitzgibbons, Chronicle staff
| |
| Hilary Woodcock (Stan Sherer photo) |
ver the past 75 years, the pantheon of life's
certainties has grown from just death and taxes to death, taxes
and federal regulations.
And as most people
on campus know, the long arm of the government bureaucracy insinuates
itself into nearly every aspect of university life. From privacy
of student records to the use of animals in research to financial
aid and foreign students, there are corresponding federal rules
and reporting mandates.
One of the areas
most keenly affected by federal regulation is research. Principal
investigators often find themselves ensnared in a complex web of
regulations governing how research is conducted, how money is spent
and accounted for, and how the results are shared.
Concerned by the
rising demands of federal regulatory agencies on campus researchers,
interim Vice Chancellor for Research Fred Byron last summer created
a new office to help faculty understand and negotiate governmental
rules. Hilary Woodcock, who previously served as program administrator
in Molecular and Cellular Biology, was appointed the campus's first
research compliance coordinator.
The need for the
new post "reflects the endless proliferation of federal regulations,"
said Byron. "We need to be more systematic about dealing with
these matters. The time has come to be more professional by creating
an office that is dedicated to helping researchers and students."
Citing Woodcock's
familiarity with the science community, Byron said she will be an
important resource to faculty and others involved in research activities.
"We need
people to give the proper training to students, postdocs and faculty,"
he said, "and to explain the regulations clearly."
"At the end
of the day, there are certain serious requirements that have to
be met," he added.
To that end, Woodcock
has been working with campus committees and offices concerned with
a range of issues regulated by federal agencies, such as radioisotopes,
animal care, recombinant DNA research, and the use of syringes and
controlled substances.
Since coming on
board last August, Woodcock has focused a lot of attention on the
pending implementation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act (HIPAA) of 1996, whose regulations become effective April 14.
"It's a very
benign sounding act," said Woodcock, "intended to protect
health record privacy."
However, as the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services crafted regulations
to implement the legislation, it became apparent that HIPAA's reach
goes far beyond safeguarding records used by health care providers.
The act also applies to all health information created or received
by public health authorities, employers, schools and universities.
Woodcock said
HIPAA has implications for campus researchers who use human subjects
in their studies. For the approximately 12 departments and programs
that employ human subjects, the legislation means extra work to
ensure that informed consent is obtained from study participants
and that additional safeguards are in place to protect the privacy
of the volunteers.
Since many of
the HIPAA regulations still have not been published, Woodcock has
also been busy monitoring the latest information coming out of HHS.
Last week, she attended a HIPAA workshop in Washington, D.C.
As the effective
date for HIPAA draws closer, Woodcock said researchers who may be
overwhelmed by the new requirements should remember that help is
available.
"My role
is to deal with the wording on informed consent," she said.
"I'm also the go-to person for information."
"This is
a service to faculty and students," said Byron. "We need
to be ahead of the curve and be aware of what's ahead and unfortunately,
it's all going in one direction. ... We want to comply in as undemanding
a fashion as we possibly can and give training in a concise way
so our researchers can focus on their work." |