|
Williams tells faculty not to lose heart
by Sarah R.
Buchholz, Chronicle staff
sking the faculty to focus on its strengths
and not lose heart in the face of budgetary difficulties, interim
Chancellor Marcellette G. Williams addressed the Faculty Senate
Feb. 28.
Williams reported that
uncertainty is a current hallmark of the budget. The governor's
proposed budget for FY03 includes what could be a $1.7 million cut
to the campus budget, and the number of employees who ultimately
will opt for early retirement is unknown.
"The critical number
for us for next year will be whatever the 2003 budget actually is,"
she said. "That is the number within which we will need to
operate the campus.
"In difficult times,
we are confronted with a challenge: how shall we know ourselves?
Shall we know ourselves only in terms of our limitations? Or shall
we know ourselves in terms of our strengths?"
Williams listed a number
of recent accomplishments on campus: the Microsoft Center for Women
in Engineering and Science, numerous awards to and recognition of
faculty, a $460,000 Davis Educational Foundation grant, the success
of the COMEC Campaign, among others.
"Highlighting positive
achievement is not meant to deny the severity of the challenges
we face," she said. "But I do believe that a preoccupation
with negativity can quickly drain our collective energies. By continually
reminding ourselves about our challenges, we risk forgetting our
strengths.
"And what we can
least afford to do now is forget our strengths. What we can least
afford to do now is lose heart."
In addition to focusing
on the positive, Williams said, faculty can bolster the campus's
credibility with legislators and the media by considering answers
to questions she has heard about course offerings and faculty teaching
loads. Advocacy for the campus will be enhanced when the campus
demonstrates "a new commitment to accountability"..."
as a central dimension of the academic enterprise in ways that make
sense to our constituents."
"We hear rumors
that if the state's revenues keep on falling, we could even be at
as high as a 15-20 percent reduction if various other things don't
come true," said senate secretary Ernest May. "We know
there's always uncertainty, but my question is, are we going forward
on the basis of some kind of planning numbers, between those two
somewhere? Or how are people going forward in planning for next
year because you can't wait until July - or it might even be October
- to do things."
"That unknown is
the biggest source of frustration for me personally as chancellor,
and I know for all of us in the executive advisory group,"
Williams said. "One of the processes whereby we've engaged
the planning, as you know, is having as much data as we possibly
can to inform every decision that's made so that we never find ourselves
in the position, when some of the unknowns become more known, of
then having to pause to get data and get information and have discussions
and conversations.
"Come July 1, this
university is going to be faced with a budget number in which we'll
need to operate. And ... we will also have a curriculum to deliver
come fall semester."
Williams noted the irony
that students will be able to secure spots in fall courses through
a new registration system this year, thereby necessitating decisions
about which courses the campus will deliver before the budget is
known.
"One of the things
we know we may need to do is provide a transition period of a sort
we've never mounted before," she said. "The good news,
I think, is that we live in a valley that's rich in intellectual
capital of former retirees, not just those who may be taking advantage
of the current system, from this campus and from the campuses in
the consortium."
Williams cited the length
of time necessary for academic planning as a contributing factor
to the need for a transitional plan and mentioned Provost's Office
initiatives in the works.
"One of the things
that may happen is a longer transition period, and by that I mean
since we know that we have students in majors, we have programs
and departments, we have tenure, we have commitments around grants,
we know that nothing happens instantly in Academic Affairs with
regard to [planning]. We know it can't happen overnight," she
said.
|