The Campus Chronicle
Vol. XVII, Issue 24
for the Amherst campus of the University of Massachusetts
March 8, 2002

 Page One Grain & Chaff Obituaries Letters to the Chronicle Archives Feedback Weekly Bulletin

 Page One Grain & Chaff Obituaries Letters to the Chronicle Archives Feedback Weekly Bulletin

Search

LETTERS POLICY

SOUND OFF!
campus.chronicle@
urd.umass.edu

 

Letters to the Chronicle

Administration should spearhead advocacy

We now all know that the University's budget this year is disastrous and is predicted to be even worse next year.

Our state senator, Stan Rosenberg, and our state representatives, Ellen Story and Steve Kulik, have told us that only vigorous legislative lobbying can reverse the University's dismal budget situation. When Stan was asked why this was happening, he replied, "Nobody's screaming."

Yet we also know that departments have been reprimanded for telling their students about their budget problems. We've been told that student workers telephoning for the Annual Fund have been instructed not to mention our budget crisis when they ask alums to donate money. We've even heard it rumored that Gov. Jane Swift does not want to cut higher education, but no member of the University administration has contacted the Governor's Office to ask for more funding.

We ask every member of the University community to tell students, relatives, friends, and acquaintances about our funding problems and urge them to encourage their legislators to provide increased University support. We hope that all of you will participate in the many advocacy efforts planned by Save UMass and other campus groups.

We also call upon the President's Office and members of the campus administration to take the lead in advocating for our University or to explain to us why they are unwilling to do so.

SARA LENNOX
professor,
Germanic Languages and Literatures
for the Save UMass Steering Committee


Interim Chancellor Marcellette Williams replies:

Advocacy on behalf of the University has always been critical to the progress of the institution and is now perhaps more critical than ever in its history.

I believe that it is the alumni, students, parents, and employers of the Commonwealth to whom we must turn for advocacy on our behalf. The Legislature and the Governor are responsible to the voters and the voters direct the Legislators and the Governor. The alumni, students, parents, and employers of the Commonwealth are voters, voters for whom the University is and has been an important and, for the vast majority we hope, a very positive influence on their lives. The faculty and staff of this University are a few thousand voters, and most of these are concentrated in a relatively few legislative districts. But the alumni, students, parents, and employers are hundreds of thousands in number and are distributed throughout the Commonwealth. We must turn to them to carry the message to their elected officials.

I also believe that the message of this advocacy must be that investment in the University is an investment in the future of the Commonwealth and in the people of the Commonwealth. The present circumstances of the alumni, students, parents, and employers is or has been defined in part by their experiences with the University; they must recognize what it means to them and, therefore, what it can mean to future generations in the Commonwealth. There is no doubt that the state's finances are in crisis and there can be no doubting that the University must expect to participate in difficult budgets. But the Legislature must be made to understand that abandoning investment in the University at this time will mean more than "mortgaging" the future, it will mean closing down the future for many of the present and future citizens of the Commonwealth.

It is essential, however, that any such advocacy be careful, focused, and based in fact if it is to be effective. Dissemination of incorrect information and rumor or use of hyperbole, no matter how well-intentioned, can quickly destroy credibility and severely counter advocacy efforts. Similarly, in-fighting between units of the campus only serves to draw energy and resources away from effective advocacy. A front page article in last week's Chronicle detailed efforts to coordinate advocacy; rather than repeat that information I would refer you to that article and the Web sites (www.umass.edu/ambassadors) and (www.umass.edu/actnow).

I welcome the advocacy of all members of the campus community who wish to do so, but I urge that this be done carefully and with a focus on the future. In so doing, the University can not only weather the immediate financial storm but also be positioned to move forward as the skies brighten.


Burn followed others in Five College post

I noted in your article about Barbara Burn [March 1] that you spoke of her former husband, North Burn, as the first Five College coordinator.

North was the first coordinator who had not been a faculty member of one of the institutions, the first hired from off campus and the first full-time coordinator. I worked with at least two earlier coordinators when I served as deputy from the University in the '60s.

BILL VENMAN
Amherst

 
    
  UMass Logo This Web site is an Official Publication of the University of Massachusetts Amherst. It is maintained by the Web Development Group of the Division of Communications & Marketing. © 2002