|
|
| Context
|Positioning | Intertextuality
| Ideology | Social
Semiotics | Hybridity |
| Personhood | Textual Chaining |
| Discourse
and Discourse Analysis
|
Discourse
in CDA
Discourse has many interpretations.
- Discourse is diachronous; it changes over
time.
Discourses establish relations among people. It puts limits
on epistemic, subjective, and ethical bases within which
a range of possible statements is possible.
In this sense, it follows that Discourses are constructed.
They specify ways of interacting.
It is not true that nothing exists outside of discourse.
However, nothing meaningfulexists outside discourse.
Discourse is a term for a moment of the social
which has no existence except through its relation to other
terms. It then follows that discourse analysis is social analysis
with a focus on the moment of discourse.
Discourse is never solely linguistic.
From Critical Discourse Studies Vol
1, Number 1. April 2004.
Discourse Analysis
is being seen as a tool in the social sciences (Fairclough
2003; Titscher, Meyer, Wodak & Vetter, 2000; Woodak and
Meyer, 2001, 2003).
There are three main ways in which discourse is or can be
analyzed. Ideological Critique, rhetorical critique, and strategic
critique.
From Critical Discourse Studies Vol
1, Number 1. April 2004.
Articles
on different meanings of discourse These
articles albeit different point out to the common theme of
showing “Discourse as Social Action” (speech as
act).
Austin, J. L. How to do things with words. In Jaworski, and
Coupland. The Discourse Reader. 1999.
Hall, Stuart. Foucault: Power, Knowledge and Discourse.
In Wetherell, Taylor, and Yates 2001. p. 72-81.
Jawroski, A. and Coupland, N. Perspectives on Discourse
Analysis. Introduction: 1-44. Treat DA as exploring the interplay
between language and social processes.
MacLure, M (2003). Discourse in Educational and Social Research.
P. 20-21 and Appendix 1 Definitions of Discourse: A sketchy
overview. P. 174-191 (postructural meaning, linguistic DA
–including CDA, conversation analysis) Basically, it
shows differences between Anglo/American, and European discursive
traditions.
Potter, Jonathan (2001). Wittgenstein and Austin. Taken From:
Wetherell, M. Taylor, S. and Yates, S. (2001). Discourse Theory
and Practice: A Reader. London: Sage Publications. Pp. 39-46
Full text available for current students only here
Schiffrin. Approaches to Discourse. Ch. 2 20-42 and p. 1-3.
(UPDATE)
Titscher, Meyer, Wodak, and Vetter. Methods of Text and Discourse
Analysis
Chp. 2 What is a text? 20-30. Based on a taxonomy by Beaugrande
and Dressler (Cohesion, coherence, Intentionality, Acceptability,
Informativity, Situationality, Intertextuality). It also addresses
the meanings of discourse.
(Not owned by library. Personal copy)
Wetherell, Taylor, and Yates 2001. Themes in Discourse Research:
The case of Diana. In p. 14-28
Hall, Stuart. Foucault: Power, Knowledge and Discourse. In
Wetherell, Taylor, and Yates 2001. p. 72-81.
Back to top
|